Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesRetail

Branded Access Offers Work Best When They’re Not Sacrificing Brand Loyalty Over a Short-Term Gain

Luxury brands that launch branded access or rental programs risk undermining the exclusivity that drives devotion among their most loyal customers. Short-term revenue gains from broader access models can erode the perceived scarcity and status signaling that premium consumers pay for. Brands must carefully weigh accessibility against the long-term equity damage caused by diluting their identity.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Retail teams put it to work with Sales Enablement.

By Mansur Khamitov, Ph.D. · · Branded Access OffersIndiana UniversityMansur KhamitovRetail Strategies
Share

Key takeaways

01

Branded access programs can conflict with the exclusivity that defines luxury brand loyalty.

02

Short-term revenue from rental or subscription models may come at the cost of long-term brand equity.

03

Loyal customers feel devalued when access to a brand they prize is extended too broadly or cheaply.

Free workspace

Turn your Retail expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

As iconic brands experiment with branded access offers—short-term product rentals—the latest research from the University of Illinois suggests a potential pitfall: these innovative strategies might erode a brand's perceived exclusivity. This revelation comes when companies grapple with balancing accessibility and maintaining the allure that defines luxury. The study warns that while these offers can attract a new consumer base, they may dilute the cachet among dedicated consumers, raising significant questions about the sustainability of such models in the luxury sector.

These innovative strategies might erode a brand's perceived exclusivity.

What are the long-term impacts of short-term rentals on brand prestige and loyalty? This core question hooks into the concerns of both consumers and marketers, especially as brands like Hermes and Bugatti weigh the benefits against potential risks to their storied reputations.

Dr. Mansur Khamitov, a leading expert in Marketing and Consumer Psychology and Assistant Professor of Marketing at Indiana University, analyzes whether the economics of capturing new consumers with these rental offers could justify the possible erosion of brand exclusivity.

Dr. Khamitov highlights several key insights from the study:

  • Brand Objectives Matter: Short-term rentals are likely detrimental for brands prioritizing exclusivity and prestige, short-term rentals are likely detrimental. Conversely, brands focusing on market expansion and awareness might find value in these strategies.
  • Brand Personality is Key: Sophisticated, high-end brands may suffer more from short-term rentals than brands perceived as sincere or competent, which might manage without alienating loyal customers.
  • Strategic Adjustments Can Mitigate Risks: Implementing longer rental periods could signal a greater commitment to consumers, potentially alleviating some risks associated with brand dilution.
  • Exclusive Rental Offers: Limiting rentals to existing or former customers might preserve a sense of exclusivity and reduce the impact on brand perception.
  • Tailored Strategies: Each brand must consider its unique characteristics and customer base when deciding whether to implement short-term rental offers.

Dr. Khamitov's analysis underscores a nuanced approach to branded access offers, urging brands to carefully evaluate their strategies in light of their specific brand ethos and consumer expectations. This expert analysis clarifies the stakes and guides brands in navigating the complex dynamics of innovation and tradition in the luxury market.

Brands must carefully evaluate their strategies in light of their specific brand ethos and consumer expectations.
— Dr. Mansur Khamitov, Assistant Professor of Marketing at Indiana University

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Retail starts with a company putting its merchandising leads, store operations teams, and category managers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Category buyers trust operators, so your merchandising leads shorten the distance between first search and first call.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

MK
Mansur Khamitov, Ph.D.
B2B Weekly

The week in Retail, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Retail: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Retail buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Retail expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your merchandising leads, store operations teams, and category managers into the articles, video, and social content Retail buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Retail Insights

How JD Sports got RFID stock counts into 414 stores in about three months

How JD Sports got RFID stock counts into 414 stores in about three months

JD Sports' mobile RFID inventory tracking reached 414 locations across the UK and Ireland in roughly three months, and the retailer reports 98% on-shelf availability and 20% faster replenishment at stores where the technology has been implemented. Associates clip an RFID sled onto the mobile computer they already use for daily tasks. Stores can run counts from twice a week or even daily, and reliably offering one-hour click-and-collect needs an accurate stock count.

  • 01The first store was live in 76 days, followed by an average pace of 26 stores a week, which could guide operators planning a handheld RFID rollout.
  • 02One-hour click-and-collect needs an accurate stock count. RFID counts can now run twice a week or daily, and teams can find loss without waiting for a 90- or 180-day audit.
  • 03Before borrowing a 98% on-shelf availability figure as a target, check whether it is measured by size, on the sales floor, and on the same stores before and after.

Nov 14, 2026

Sunoco to shift Go Rewards and Journie Rewards to VLG, starting in early 2027

Sunoco will move Go Rewards and Journie Rewards, the program it got with Parkland, onto Velocity Logic Group's loyalty platform, starting with a phased rollout in early 2027. VLG will run the apps, the account migration and partner redemption. Sunoco's new Credit One card pays an extra 3 cents a gallon only when linked to the app.

  • 01Sunoco is handing one vendor its loyalty apps, account migration, Pay with Points redemption and partner connections in two countries, with a phased rollout from early 2027 and automatic balance transfers while earning and redemption continue during the transition.
  • 02Three of the new Credit One card’s 12 cents a gallon require linking the card to the Sunoco app, and the article argues that makes the app—and the platform behind it—part of what determines what customers pay at the pump.
  • 03Sunoco counts about 400 stores of its own in the U.S. but roughly 5,700 Sunoco-branded U.S. locations, so a loyalty platform has to work well beyond the sites the company runs itself.

Nov 13, 2026

RFID projects risk failure when IT or store ops owns them alone

RFID projects risk failure when IT or store ops owns them alone

DataScan engineers Kelsey Grolig and Carlos Rego argue RFID success depends on a defined business problem, cross-functional ownership and a road map, and Rego says IT-only or operations-only projects carry a high probability of failure. NRF reports American Eagle moved from 95% to 99% inventory accuracy across 500-plus stores, while the RAIN Alliance says 2025 chip shipments fell to 42.7 billion.

  • 01Carlos Rego of DataScan says RFID projects owned only by IT or only by store operations carry a high probability of failure; Grolig stresses executive sponsorship and a cross-functional program leader to align teams and the road map.
  • 02American Eagle moved from 95% to 99% inventory accuracy across more than 500 stores over nearly two years, according to NRF, showing the final points of accuracy take sustained operational work rather than a hardware swap.
  • 03RAIN RFID chip shipments fell to 42.7 billion in 2025 from a 2024 record on tariffs and retail destocking, the RAIN Alliance said in April 2026, so market timing shapes rollout pace alongside organizational readiness.

Nov 13, 2026

Explore More Retail Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Retail.

Browse Retail Hub

About the Expert

MK
Mansur Khamitov, Ph.D.

Associate Partner, Customer & Growth at EY

Mansur Khamitov, Ph.D. is an associate partner at EY specializing in customer experience, brand strategy, and consumer behavior. He holds a doctorate and has published research on brand loyalty, interpersonal relationships with brands, and consumer psychology. His work bridges academic research and practical business strategy for global clients.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Retail and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512