Addressing the Lack of Diversity in STEM Careers

 

Minorities continue to face challenges in pursuing STEM careers due to a lack of access to resources and institutional biases. Early education programs often fail to expose them to technology career paths or inspire a love for technology. The lack of role models within their circles discourages them from pursuing STEM careers and has created a pressing need for addressing educational disparities in STEM for underserved youth.

Programs like Challenges and Opportunities for Minorities in STEM Jobs and All-In STEM, founded by Dr. Kenneth Gibbs Jr. and Dr. Ciara Sivels exist with the purpose of addressing educational disparities in STEM for Underserved Youth. The program offers hands-on experience and technical knowledge to students, as well as the opportunity to work in a STEM field of their interest. Olwyn DePutron, the Director of Step IT Up America at UST, another similar program, shares their opinion about providing a path for underrepresented minorities to enter and thrive in STEM careers, where a more diverse and inclusive future for the industry can be created.

Olwyn’s Thoughts:

“In today’s workplace, there’s still a limited number of minorities pursuing STEM careers. The reasons behind this falls into a few buckets. One reason is that in the early education age, there are not a lot of programs available within the schools minorities attend to expose them to the different technology career paths or even to help them to build a love for things technology-wise in addition to the early education.

The familiar circles or relationship circles that minorities grow up in and the individuals they encounter often have jobs outside of technology. There’s often not a role model who would encourage them to pursue STEM careers or to pursue them to build skill sets for STEM careers.

Lastly, the opportunities afforded to them are often done so without the education, without the mentorship, and without guidance. They would not be directed to STEM fields or STEM careers. The Step Up program gives them the education, it gives them the mentorship, and it also gives them an opportunity, an open door to start off that career in technology.

The program allows them to pursue a passion that they may have for technology and train them up in a skillset. From the beginning, all the way to giving them hands-on experience, technical knowledge, and an opportunity to work in a field or in a specific role where they can enhance and build upon the skillset that they learned in the classroom.

In addition, they’re mentored not only by a coach but also a mentor who is within the client organization. Lastly, the client in partnership with us affords them an opportunity to get a role within that organization and continue to build up on their skillset and continue to move forward in a technology field of their interest.”

Article by Galina Mikova.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Image

Latest

insurance denials
From Peer-to-Peers to Paper Wars: Inside the Daily Grind of Fighting Insurance Denials
December 3, 2025

Insurance denials have quietly become one of the most powerful forces shaping American healthcare, not through better outcomes but through a steady tightening of what insurers are willing to cover and when they’ll say so. The real scandal isn’t just that claims get rejected—it’s that the system rewards obstruction, pressuring hospitals to spend…

Read More
healthcare
Navigating the Power Differential: A Physician’s Perspective
December 2, 2025

Healthcare in the U.S. often feels less like a covenant and more like a negotiation conducted on a tilted table, where insurers hold the rulebook and patients hold the receipt for their pain. The “two-midnight rule” and similar fixes were meant to tame arbitrary denials, yet the system keeps sprouting fresh loopholes because…

Read More
care
Navigating the Denial Pipeline: How Medicare Advantage Plans Reshape Access to Care
December 2, 2025

Medicare Advantage was sold as a smarter, more efficient way to care for seniors, but too often the efficiency seems to land on the wrong side of the patient–provider relationship. When plans deny or delay needed services through opaque rules and weak oversight, beneficiaries feel it first—in missed therapies, postponed procedures, and a…

Read More
patient
Rebecca Interview: When Peer-to-Peer Reviews Stop Being About the Patient
December 2, 2025

Behind the sterile labels of “inpatient” versus “observation” care is a messy reality: clinicians and insurers often enter peer-to-peer reviews without a shared rulebook, turning what should be a clinical dialogue into a box-checking exercise. The speaker’s frustration points to a broader problem in U.S. healthcare utilization management—decisions about coverage can feel pre-decided,…

Read More