Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

Cybersecurity Professionals Say They Lack Confidence in Stopping Breaches. Here’s What They Say is to Blame and How to Fix It.

A recent Exabeam survey of 500 IT professionals reveals that many cybersecurity specialists feel under-resourced, overworked, and inadequately trained to proactively prevent breaches. The findings highlight systemic gaps in staffing, tooling, and organizational support that undermine confidence across the profession. The article examines the root causes identified by respondents and proposes actionable remedies.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By carey.scott · Business OperationsCyber-attacksCybersecurity ProfessionalsData Breaches
Share

Key takeaways

01

Many cybersecurity professionals lack confidence in their ability to stop breaches due to insufficient resources and training.

02

Exabeam's survey of 500 IT professionals exposes widespread feelings of being understaffed and overwhelmed.

03

Addressing the gap requires improvements in workforce investment, tooling, and organizational prioritization of cybersecurity.

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Software & Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Software & Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

Cybersecurity professionals are voicing concerns over their ability to actually perform cybersecurity. Exabeam’s recent survey of 500 IT professionals sheds light on just how strained they perceive their workloads, resources, and training to be. According to the report, many cybersecurity specialists feel under-resourced and unable to adequately carry out their duties as proactive cybersafety strategists. This could result in additional data breaches, cyberattacks, and other security incidents that have the potential to significantly harm individuals and businesses.

It’s not crystal clear just who’s to blame here, but it’s obvious that IT professionals need a strategy change and a better approach to leveraging their existing tools or to getting equipped with new ones. The survey showed that cybersecurity professionals seem overly confident (some 97% of respondents) in their abilities to prevent attacks, perhaps reflecting their assessment of self-worth and gumption to get the job done. But when pressed further about realities on the ground, only 62% said they feel confident telling their managers that the network is experiencing zero breaches at any given time, and another 43% said they see themselves as “unable to prevent bad things from happening.”

So why is it that so many professionals continue to report a lack of confidence in their role’s success and a lack of holistic visibility over their networks? How can analyzing the strategic issues constraining cybersecurity professionals today help reveal the right solutions? To answer these questions and dig deeper into the survey, Tyler Farrar, Chief Information Security Officer at Exabeam, shares his thoughts on the report.

Tyler’s Thoughts

“97% of the 500 US Security professional respondents reported feeling confident that they are well-equipped with the tools and the processes they need to prevent and identify intrusions.

But when we analyzed these results further, we found some contradictions in these claims. Our research actually highlighted that the inability to prevent bad things from happening is the worst part of a security job. We had more than a third of our respondents unsure that they could even tell their boards that they had no adversaries inside their network.

Now, the threat landscape is constantly evolving and we’re constantly seeing new threats and attack techniques emerge. I know that attempting to keep up with these changes and stay ahead of attackers is challenging and very overwhelming. That’s even true for some of the most experienced cybersecurity professionals out there.

It is a game of cat and mouse and professionals feel like they’re always playing catch up. This creates a lack of confidence and their ability to protect their organization’s networks. So, here’s a few reasons. Cybersecurity professionals lack that confidence. The first one’s organizational, cybersecurity is not always a priority for some organizations, cybersecurity can become siloed within the organization.

There may be limited resources allocated to this space. There could be inadequate training and education. For example, there may be a limited cybersecurity budget for your tools and technologies. Maybe there’s not enough staff at your disposal to properly manage and monitor the organization’s networks. It creates an overwhelming feeling of frustration; it undermines confidence and the ability to protect the organization and to work effectively across the organization.

The second one’s technical. On the technical side, there is a major complexity to modern networks, systems and just the overall evolving threat landscape. Modern networks are extremely complex and they use multiple layers of technology.

So, managing these and securing these networks are very challenging. There’s also an explosive growth and volume of data. And so Legacy SIEM Solutions and other security tools that aren’t purpose built for security, uh, lead to security professionals having to keep up with all of this new growth and data volume. Trying to manage that and the latest attacks and techniques will create a lack of visibility.

It also will require a much higher level of technical expertise. Cybersecurity professionals who lack that knowledge will feel overwhelmed, and it’s going to require ongoing training and education. So, if you have people that are not equipped to understand these new and rigorous concepts, they might fall behind.

Now, the third one is the human factor, and it’s really around the fear of failure. Cybersecurity professionals are under an immense amount of pressure to prevent cyber-attacks and protect their organizations. that type of pressure is acute and it is particularly high in high-stakes environments. It’s critical to national security, the intense pressure and long hours associated with what’s going on across these varying evolving tactics and techniques of attackers can lead to employee burnout.

Furthermore, it can also lead to indecision when a true security incident occurs. Cybersecurity professionals feel like the consequences of failure are so great that it leads to a lack of confidence in their ability to meet high expectations. So, without having a strong and effective cybersecurity posture, these aspects can have a significant impact on business operations and network security.

It also makes organizations vulnerable to a range of threats, cyber-attacks, data breaches, and security incidents. An organization could or will experience downtime or disruption to their business operations, which is an extremely costly and damaging feat to encounter.

Once a successful breach occurs, it can result in the theft or loss of sensitive data, which leads to reputational damage and legal and financial liabilities. It’s the same thing with a malware infection or some other security incident that results in downtime for business operations. It can and will impact productivity and revenue.

In addition, a lack of resources and tools to monitor networks effectively can result in cybersecurity professionals being unable to identify and respond to threats in a very timely manner. This allows attackers to persist in an organization’s network. It increases the risk of a data breach or data loss and operational disruption.

And overall, both business operations and network security are very closely linked to the effectiveness of an organization’s security posture. Organizations have to address all factors that contribute to the lack of visibility and confidence in cybersecurity to ensure that these networks and the data are protected from this ever-evolving threat landscape.

It’s going to take a coordinated effort and this is between the private sector and various influential cybersecurity professionals, organizations and government agencies. And this can happen in a variety of ways. One of the big ones is the overall improvement of training and education. It is essential to provide all cybersecurity professionals regardless of experience with initial access to education and baseline and ongoing training, etc., to keep up with evolving threats and attack techniques.

And this is both for technical and non-technical training. Technical training focuses on a hands-on approach with different tools and technologies, while non-technical training focuses on educating professionals on how to communicate and collaborate effectively.

The second piece is it just increasing the overall collaboration. Cybersecurity professionals have to work more closely with other teams within their organizations. It’s the only way to really develop a holistic approach to cybersecurity while simultaneously ensuring the space is integrated into all organizational operations.

The third one is the further investment in new technology and tools that can help organizations effectively monitor threats across their organization and respond to security incidents. This can include advanced threat detection and response, as well as user behavior and device behavior analytics.

Next, create clear roles and responsibilities both within the organization and outside of it, using more of a macro lens. It’s important to ensure that roles and responsibilities are set across the organization for cybersecurity responsibilities and that each team has the resources and support needed to carry out these rules effectively.

This can include developing an incident response plan, having the authority and autonomy needed to make decisions during a security incident. And finally cultivate an organization-wide culture of cybersecurity that stresses cooperation, continual education, risk awareness, and continuous development. This will enable cybersecurity professionals to input and impart their expertise and experience to others, and it fosters cybersecurity awareness and best practices throughout the enterprise.”

Article written by Sonia Gossai.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Software & Technology starts with a company putting its solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Buyers ask AI engines who to consider, and published expert answers are what those engines cite.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

C
carey.scott

Follow Software & Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Software & Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers into the articles, video, and social content Software & Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Software & Technology Insights

Nvidia Says It Will Double Chip Sales Next Year. The Supply Chain Is Where That Gets Decided.

Nvidia Says It Will Double Chip Sales Next Year. The Supply Chain Is Where That Gets Decided.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang forecasted doubling chip sales next year, but the company's CFO frames this as the supply-unconstrained scenario, signaling that supply chain capacity, not demand, is the real constraint. Nvidia and Palantir launched a collaboration to apply AI to Nvidia's own supply chain operations to identify bottlenecks and allocate materials more effectively.

  • 01Nvidia's doubling forecast depends on supply chain throughput, not demand—the company itself is supply constrained according to CFO Colette Kress.
  • 02Nvidia and Palantir said their first sovereign AI deployment for Nvidia’s operations is designed to spot supply constraints earlier and improve how materials are allocated across production.
  • 03Enterprise buyers should plan for competitive allocation pressure, higher networking and infrastructure costs alongside GPU spending, and the emergence of on-premises architectures as first-class options.

Sep 20, 2026

Fifth Third, Priority and CSI deals put a premium on payments built into software

Fifth Third, Priority and CSI deals put a premium on payments built into software

Fifth Third led a strategic investment in Payload, Priority Commerce agreed to acquire IntelliPay, and CSI acquired Qolo in a series of summer transactions, PYMNTS reported. Together, the deals point to buyers valuing payments technology already integrated into the software customers use, not just standalone processing capacity. For operators, that means the entity holding payment data can change hands without the front-end software changing.

  • 01BCG puts software providers with integrated payments at 36% of small and midsize business acquiring revenue in 2024, heading to 45% by 2028, a benchmark for where merchant payment spend is shifting.
  • 02Finance and IT leaders at firms running property, practice management or utility billing software should check who actually owns the payment module in their contract, because that is the asset being bought.

Sep 19, 2026

System integrators decide whether factory tech pays off, Smart Industry argues

System integrators decide whether factory tech pays off, Smart Industry argues

Smart Industry’s Sept. 9, 2026 piece argues plant technology creates no business value until system integrators fit it into existing systems, operations and workflows. Related summer coverage highlights upskilling, institutional knowledge and technician demand alongside the same integration-and-deployment theme. The framing shifts attention from which platform to buy to who implements it and how the engagement is scoped.

  • 01Smart Industry's framing moves the buying question from which platform to license to who integrates it and how that engagement is scoped, which puts the system integrator line item at the center of the return rather than in implementation overhead.
  • 02Gartner figures cited by Quality Magazine show 24% of industrial enterprises using IoT have implemented digital twins and 42% plan to, suggesting most IoT-using plants still have digital twin integration work ahead.
  • 03The Deloitte and Manufacturing Institute report, as covered by Smart Industry, says AI can embed skills into workflows to address technician demand; the sharper question for a plant manager is whether that changes headcount or changes what each technician can cover.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

C
carey.scott

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Software & Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512