Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

From Cybersec Guidelines to Guardrails: America Must Ditch the Standards Debate for Practical Cybersecurity Wins

Federal IT leaders are calling for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to strengthen cybersecurity standards. This focus aims to protect critical infrastructure sectors from rising cyber threats. The article discusses practical cybersecurity strategies that go beyond standard debates.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Software And Technology · · CisaCisa Covid Task ForceCyber AdvisoryCybersecurity Concerns
Share

Key takeaways

01

Federal IT leaders are pushing for stricter cybersecurity standards.

02

CISA is urged to enhance collaboration and implement more enforceable practices.

03

There is a need for actionable cybersecurity strategies to protect infrastructure.

Free workspace

Turn your Software & Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Recent calls from Federal IT leaders for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to implement stricter cybersecurity standards and enhance collaboration have given rise to a pressing question: How can sectors of critical infrastructure effectively shield themselves from the growing wave of cyber threats through actionable and enforceable cybersecurity practices?

Drawing on his experience as the former Chief Strategist for the CISA COVID Task Force (2020-2022), I Am The Cavalry Founder Josh Corman highlights the crucial need to move from voluntary frameworks to mandatory cybersecurity standards that clearly establish what constitutes negligence. Corman called for a more focused approach, emphasizing the importance of a vital transition towards practical and mandatory cybersecurity measures in order to strengthen the defenses of critical infrastructure against an ever-expanding landscape of cyber threats.

“There’s a lot of frameworks. Unfortunately, there’s very little progress… What we need is less frameworks and more progress against these minimum hygiene levels,” Corman said.

Article written by MarketScale.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Software & Technology starts with a company putting its solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Buyers ask AI engines who to consider, and published expert answers are what those engines cite.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

SA
Software And Technology
B2B Weekly

The week in Software & Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Software & Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers into the articles, video, and social content Software & Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Software & Technology Insights

HFS survey: only a third of AI-active enterprises hit their AI business case

HFS survey: only a third of AI-active enterprises hit their AI business case

Only 33% of 502 senior AI decision makers at AI-active enterprises said their biggest AI program met or beat its business case in an HFS Research–Rackspace survey. Success drops to 28% when AI spans several functions. HFS says the pattern points to a fixable gap: unclear ownership of live AI performance, cost and governance as one system.

  • 01Business-case success falls from 37% to 28% as AI moves from one function to several, and reaches 56% where AI is embedded in standard operations. The groups differ, so this is a pattern rather than proof.
  • 02Survey buyers signaled willingness to pay a premium for a single accountable operator—73% said they would pay for a contracting model tied to clear operational responsibilities and measurable outcomes. HFS says the appetite is strongest among companies that have already felt the ownership gap.
  • 03Before adding another function to a working AI program, settle who answers for its performance, cost and governance after go-live, and how each is measured.

Nov 15, 2026

IBM and Microsoft's Imagine Enterprise starts with more than 6,000 pre-built AI agents and assets

IBM and Microsoft's Imagine Enterprise starts with more than 6,000 pre-built AI agents and assets

Imagine Enterprise, the agent platform from IBM and Microsoft, pairs IBM Consulting's more than 6,000 AI agents and assets with Microsoft's AI, data, cloud and security foundation. Forward-deployed engineers from both companies support qualifying engagements. For regulated firms, a useful test could be how quickly one named process reaches production.

  • 01Imagine Enterprise combines more than 6,000 AI agents and assets, Microsoft's identity, security and AI governance tools, and forward-deployed engineers from both companies for qualifying engagements, which suggests buying it looks closer to a delivery engagement than a software download.
  • 02Microsoft products including Entra, Purview and Defender provide the identity, AI governance and security foundation, which could matter most for regulated firms already standardized on Microsoft.
  • 03The sharper pilot question is wall-clock completion time and success rate on one named process as more agents run at once, a yardstick Arm is pushing for agentic workloads.

Nov 15, 2026

Google’s TPU 8tx and 8i Max: bandwidth vs. confidential inference

Google’s TPU 8tx and 8i Max: bandwidth vs. confidential inference

Google Cloud has added two systems to its eighth-generation TPU lineup. Network World reports that TPU 8tx is Google Cloud’s first TPU with confidential computing, developed with AMD, and Zeniteq says it uses TPU 8t silicon for secured inference. Google says TPU 8i Max packages two TPU 8i chips together, doubling bandwidth and SRAM while increasing HBM capacity by about a third.

  • 01Neither system uses a new accelerator design: TPU 8tx pairs TPU 8t silicon with fifth-generation AMD EPYC hosts and Google's Boardfly network, while TPU 8i Max packages two existing TPU 8i chips together.
  • 02TPU 8i Max doubles memory bandwidth and on-chip SRAM but raises HBM capacity by 33%, and bandwidth and capacity answer different questions: how fast context data moves versus how much of it the system can hold.
  • 03The 2x latency claim for TPU 8tx is measured against TPU 8t, while the 8i Max gains are measured against TPU 8i. Neither figure says which system finishes a given job more cheaply.

Nov 14, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

SA
Software And Technology

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Software & Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512