Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

How Can Critical Infrastructure Facilities Become Cyber-Resilient

Critical infrastructure facilities can become cyber-resilient by adopting a 'defense in depth' strategy that includes multiple layers of security. Experts Luke Fox and Dr. Robin Berthier discuss the increasing risks posed by modern connectivity, particularly in utility markets, and emphasize the importance of building systems with the expectation of cyber-attacks. Ensuring visibility and updating network components are key steps towards achieving cyber resiliency.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Luke Fox · · Cyber ResilienceCybersecurityLuke FoxLuke Fox Podcast
Share
How Can Critical Infrastructure Facilities Become Cyber-Resilient

Key takeaways

01

Critical infrastructure facilities should adopt multiple layers of security to become cyber-resilient.

02

Modern connectivity and IoT in utility markets increase the risk of cyber-attacks and require a new approach to cybersecurity.

03

Achieving cyber resiliency requires visibility, updating network components, and applying the principle of least privilege for applications.

Free workspace

Turn your Software & Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Bringing together leaders, lawmakers and lawbreakers. Host Luke Fox explores how innovations in business and technology are redefining our trust in security measures.

Trusting a technology network is fundamental for modern business, but what happens when trust is broken because of cyber-attacks? The Trust Revolution topics the shortcomings of cybersecurity and how to close the gap. Host Luke Fox welcomed Dr. Robin Berthier, a pioneer in the field and CEO of Network Perception, a provider of corporate compliance and cybersecurity monitoring solutions for utility companies.

Berthier explained the new challenges for the utility market. “Utilities have modernized and that connectivity, especially around equipment and IoT, increase the risk for disruption and attacks.”

Berthier and Fox discussed a recent compromise to a water treatment plant. A weak cybersecurity network allowed for penetration. The attackers changed the setting of chemicals. Fortunately, the facility prevented the chemicals from going into the water supply, which could have been poisonous.

How can utilities protect against this? Berthier recommends “defense in depth or multiple layers of security.” He also cautions that companies need to change the way they think about cybersecurity. They should focus on when not if an attack occurs.

“It’s impossible to keep everything outside of the perimeter, so design a system with this in mind. Software vulnerabilities are only growing. There were 6000 in 2016 and 18,000 in 2020.”

The position Berthier urges is cyber resiliency. To achieve this, he said, “Visibility is key. Know what you have in your network and keep it up to date. Also, follow the principle of least privilege for applications.”

Cybersecurity is also a concern for more than just IT. It requires a robust compliance program, redundancy to ensure business continuity, and diversity of tools. For this to work harmoniously, teams across many departments are imperative.

While cybersecurity is becoming more complex, Berthier pointed out that simplicity and usability still matter. Balancing them with visibility, resiliency, and compliance will be the future of a cybersecurity framework.

Catch Up On Previous Episodes of The Trust Revolution!

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Software & Technology starts with a company putting its solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Buyers ask AI engines who to consider, and published expert answers are what those engines cite.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

LF
Luke Fox
B2B Weekly

The week in Software & Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Software & Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers into the articles, video, and social content Software & Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Software & Technology Insights

HFS survey: only a third of AI-active enterprises hit their AI business case

HFS survey: only a third of AI-active enterprises hit their AI business case

Only 33% of 502 senior AI decision makers at AI-active enterprises said their biggest AI program met or beat its business case in an HFS Research–Rackspace survey. Success drops to 28% when AI spans several functions. HFS says the pattern points to a fixable gap: unclear ownership of live AI performance, cost and governance as one system.

  • 01Business-case success falls from 37% to 28% as AI moves from one function to several, and reaches 56% where AI is embedded in standard operations. The groups differ, so this is a pattern rather than proof.
  • 02Survey buyers signaled willingness to pay a premium for a single accountable operator—73% said they would pay for a contracting model tied to clear operational responsibilities and measurable outcomes. HFS says the appetite is strongest among companies that have already felt the ownership gap.
  • 03Before adding another function to a working AI program, settle who answers for its performance, cost and governance after go-live, and how each is measured.

Nov 15, 2026

IBM and Microsoft's Imagine Enterprise starts with more than 6,000 pre-built AI agents and assets

IBM and Microsoft's Imagine Enterprise starts with more than 6,000 pre-built AI agents and assets

Imagine Enterprise, the agent platform from IBM and Microsoft, pairs IBM Consulting's more than 6,000 AI agents and assets with Microsoft's AI, data, cloud and security foundation. Forward-deployed engineers from both companies support qualifying engagements. For regulated firms, a useful test could be how quickly one named process reaches production.

  • 01Imagine Enterprise combines more than 6,000 AI agents and assets, Microsoft's identity, security and AI governance tools, and forward-deployed engineers from both companies for qualifying engagements, which suggests buying it looks closer to a delivery engagement than a software download.
  • 02Microsoft products including Entra, Purview and Defender provide the identity, AI governance and security foundation, which could matter most for regulated firms already standardized on Microsoft.
  • 03The sharper pilot question is wall-clock completion time and success rate on one named process as more agents run at once, a yardstick Arm is pushing for agentic workloads.

Nov 15, 2026

Google’s TPU 8tx and 8i Max: bandwidth vs. confidential inference

Google’s TPU 8tx and 8i Max: bandwidth vs. confidential inference

Google Cloud has added two systems to its eighth-generation TPU lineup. Network World reports that TPU 8tx is Google Cloud’s first TPU with confidential computing, developed with AMD, and Zeniteq says it uses TPU 8t silicon for secured inference. Google says TPU 8i Max packages two TPU 8i chips together, doubling bandwidth and SRAM while increasing HBM capacity by about a third.

  • 01Neither system uses a new accelerator design: TPU 8tx pairs TPU 8t silicon with fifth-generation AMD EPYC hosts and Google's Boardfly network, while TPU 8i Max packages two existing TPU 8i chips together.
  • 02TPU 8i Max doubles memory bandwidth and on-chip SRAM but raises HBM capacity by 33%, and bandwidth and capacity answer different questions: how fast context data moves versus how much of it the system can hold.
  • 03The 2x latency claim for TPU 8tx is measured against TPU 8t, while the 8i Max gains are measured against TPU 8i. Neither figure says which system finishes a given job more cheaply.

Nov 14, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Experts

LF
Luke Fox

Luke Fox is the host of 'The Trust Revolution,' where he explores innovations in business and technology that redefine trust in security measures.

DR
Dr. Robin Berthier

CEO

Network Perception

Dr. Robin Berthier is a pioneer in corporate compliance and cybersecurity monitoring solutions for utility companies.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Software & Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512