Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

The Economics of a Global Capability Center

As outsourcing costs rise, global capability centers may offer a solution for CIOs facing talent acquisition challenges. Leaders like Dr. Patricia Connolly of SMC Squared and Jan Ross, formerly of nThrive, emphasize the strategic benefits of these centers. Despite initial concerns, their experiences highlight both cost savings and talent investment benefits.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Software And Technology · Global Capability CentersIt SupportOrganizational InsightsTalent Acquisition
Share
The Economics of a Global Capability Center

Key takeaways

01

Global capability centers can mitigate rising outsourcing costs.

02

In-house global capability centers foster greater investment from employees in company success.

03

Transitioning to a GCC offers potential cost savings without sacrificing quality.

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Software & Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Software & Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

As outsourcing costs rise, while finding the right talent is akin to locating a needle in a haystack, CIOs search for solutions to these present-day challenges. Thankfully, global capability centers may offer an answer. Dr. Patricia Connolly, Founding Partner and CEO at SMC Squared, and Jan Ross, Former CIO at nThrive, sat down to discuss these issues and provide their thoughts on what makes global capability centers (GCCs) stand out in today’s talent marketplace.

A third-party talent outsourcer’s main job is to satisfy the parameters of the work contract. The contracted person may do all the job requirements but won’t necessarily have a stake in the company. But when bringing in individuals as members of a particular organization, they are more invested in being a part of the company’s success. “They’re not there just to check the box of a contract,” Ross said. “They’re not there to say we don’t do that, so if you want that done, it will cost you more.”

While Ross’s experiences with having a global capability center built at nThrive were positive and her preferred talent acquisition method, building GCCs in-house does take some work. “I recommend always bringing a partner in that’s been there, done that,” Ross said. “There’s a lot of legalities in it. It takes a lot of process and time to deliver to get your organization set up.”

Transitioning to a GCC can be an anxious process for a business unfamiliar with the advantages this model can provide. However, the cost savings alone offer an attractive incentive to move from a traditional outsourcing model to a global capability center. Still, the concern for many US companies is whether or not that economic savings will have a hidden cost in sacrificing quality, consistency, and reliability. Ross did not find this to be the case. “The numbers are accurate, and you can truly get the lower cost opportunities. The individuals are incredibly talented. It’s amazing the capabilities, the education, the drive, and the individuals we’ve brought in from a GCC perspective; they are thrilled to be part of that company.”

For more episodes, please visit the Squared Away Podcast series, and to learn more, visit SMC2’s website.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Software & Technology starts with a company putting its solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Buyers ask AI engines who to consider, and published expert answers are what those engines cite.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

SA
Software And Technology

Follow Software & Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Software & Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers into the articles, video, and social content Software & Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Software & Technology Insights

OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra pitch is to skip integrations and run the software UI itself

OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra pitch is to skip integrations and run the software UI itself

OpenAI shipped GPT-6 Astra on Sept. 3 with a "computer use" capability that lets the model operate existing software UIs directly instead of requiring custom API integrations. The staged rollout through Daybreak, ChatGPT tiers, and AWS shifts the automation bottleneck from building connectors to governing UI-driven sessions, with speed measured in minutes per task as the cost input.

  • 01Astra operates software via pixels, keyboard, and mouse interactions to bypass API integration work on the long tail of internal tools without clean API access
  • 02OpenAI reported Astra at 40 minutes per task (47% faster than GPT-5.6 Sol at 75 minutes), making task time the practical proxy for compute cost modeling and throughput evaluation
  • 03Enterprises must define governance before broad rollout: eligible workflows for UI automation, audit logging systems, identity and secrets handling, and fallback procedures when UIs change or sessions break

Sep 3, 2026

Cloud is set to take 26% of IT budgets, and hiring is shifting toward platforms

Cloud is set to take 26% of IT budgets, and hiring is shifting toward platforms

Foundry’s 2026 Cloud Computing Study, cited by CIO, reports IT leaders expect 26% of IT budgets to go to cloud computing in the next year and that 74% accelerated cloud migrations in the last 12 months. At the same time, CIO’s coverage of Robert Half Technology’s 2026 IT salary report shows AI/ML engineers at a $170,750 median salary and a striking capability gap, with only 7% of leaders saying they have the capabilities to complete prioritized projects and 65% expecting to upskill existing staff. Separate reporting from Nextgov on senior appointments in the Pentagon CIO office, and Government Technology’s account of Illinois’ multi-agency data-sharing MOU, indicate large organizations are staffing for organizational change, governance, and cross-domain data sharing, not just for lift-and-shift migrations. For enterprise operators, the signal is that cloud programs increasingly depend on internal platform engineering, adoption enablement, and finance-aligned governance, because those functions connect migration speed to day-two operations and business results.

  • 01A useful benchmark for 2026 planning: Foundry’s survey puts cloud at 26% of IT budget next year, so showback/FinOps and workload-level chargeback governance can’t stay a side project (per CIO citing Foundry).
  • 02Talent pricing has become an input to architecture decisions. A CIO, citing Robert Half, compared the median pay for AI/ML engineers ($170,750) with systems administrators ($98,000), arguing that platform standardization and self-service guardrails are as much about labor strategy as technology.
  • 03If 65% of leaders expect to upskill to close gaps, the differentiator becomes your internal adoption system, in-app guidance, runbooks, and training telemetry, not the third new tool in the stack (per CIO citing Robert Half; illustrated by Ferring’s Whatfix rollout reported by BankInfoSecurity).

Sep 2, 2026

AI agents are pushing access controls and testing into the data layer

AI agents are pushing access controls and testing into the data layer

Snowflake is warning that dashboard-era access controls do not hold up once AI agents can query and act across datasets, pushing governance closer to the data layer, according to TechTarget’s Computer Weekly. In parallel, TechTarget reported that enterprise AI-agent testing needs to expand beyond pre-deployment checks into continuous monitoring so agents don’t drift beyond prescribed instructions. InformationWeek’s reporting on CISOs at Intuit, Smartsheet and ETS adds the operational risk: unmanaged “AI orphans” and identity sprawl as agent count grows, which shifts near-term workload onto IAM, data governance and platform engineering teams building the guardrails.

  • 01If an AI agent can reach multiple tools, the real control plane becomes the data layer and identity, not the BI dashboard permissions model.
  • 02Agent rollouts that stop at pre-production testing are likely to miss the failure mode operators actually see, post-deploy tool changes that alter what the agent can do.
  • 03“AI orphans” is a practical inventory problem: if teams can’t enumerate agents, they can’t set ownership, secrets rotation, or access reviews on a schedule.

Sep 2, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Experts

SA
Software And Technology
DP
Dr. Patricia Connolly

Founding Partner and CEO

SMC Squared

Dr. Patricia Connolly is a Founding Partner and CEO at SMC Squared, bringing expertise in establishing global capability centers. She has been instrumental in providing strategic solutions for talent acquisition challenges in the tech industry.

JR
Jan Ross

Former CIO

nThrive

Jan Ross served as the Chief Information Officer at nThrive, leading initiatives in talent acquisition and organizational strategy. She advocates for global capability centers as a solution to rising outsourcing costs and talent acquisition issues.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Software & Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512