Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesTransportation

Tesla to Add Radar in Hopes of Achieving Full Self Driving in Vehicles

Tesla radar technology is back in the news. Last year Elon Musk made it clear that Tesla was ditching its radar technology and that Full Self Driving (FSD) would be made safer by only using Vision, or camera-only, technology. However, Tesla’s Certification Engineer, Cindi Li, wrote to the FCC last week asking for a confidentiality…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Transportation teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Share

Get featured

Want MarketScale to feature Transportation?

Book a 15-minute demo and we'll map your Transportation expertise to the content buyers are searching for.

Book a demo

Tesla radar technology is back in the news. Last year Elon Musk made it clear that Tesla was ditching its radar technology and that Full Self Driving (FSD) would be made safer by only using Vision, or camera-only, technology. However, Tesla’s Certification Engineer, Cindi Li, wrote to the FCC last week asking for a confidentiality extension as they prepare to put radars back in their vehicles.

Li’s letter asks for things such as manuals and photos to not be published until a new date of February 7th, 2023 as to “avoid any unnecessary disclosure or competitive harm before our product launch”. This request was filed just one day before filings would have been made public and was granted by the FCC.

Chuck Gershman, CEO of Owl Autonomous Imaging, says that radar technology should theoretically be the correct move in pursuit of FSD but doesn’t believe it’ll be the last change by Tesla along this route.

Chuck’s Thoughts on Tesla Radar Technology

“It’s just been announced that the Tesla vision plan, which previously claimed that the best way to achieve self-driving was through visual, camera-only based systems as their primary sensor. They’ve now reversed course, and they’re relaunching radar to supplement their camera systems.

And the question is this an appropriate course of action? In our opinion, yes, absolutely. Radar systems are quite robust and they operate across all environmental conditions and they operate day or night. Camera systems, on the other hand, have worked quite well but have degradation issues associated with environment.

And they degrade precipitously between daytime operation and nighttime operation. So a supplemental system or a fusion of sensors is an appropriate way to make systems safer, especially for hands-free driving. Now, is this the appropriate or the final step? We believe not so much.

Again, as we said, radars are quite robust and are a good complement to the camera system. But the degradation associated with the camera system specifically during nighttime operation or foul weather operation will compromise the system and we believe that Tesla needs to address this problem”

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Transportation starts with a company putting its fleet managers, logistics engineers, and safety leads on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Fleet and logistics buyers compare quietly, and your operators become the evidence that settles it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Transportation Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Transportation: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Transportation buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Transportation expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your fleet managers, logistics engineers, and safety leads into the articles, video, and social content Transportation buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Transportation Insights

Global supply chains face a three-front stress test: Hormuz, European waterways, and a US robot import ban

Global supply chains face a three-front stress test: Hormuz, European waterways, and a US robot import ban

Global supply chains are under pressure from multiple fronts: tensions in Hormuz, low water levels in the Rhine, and a U.S. ban on imported robots. These factors amplify challenges for operators already grappling with disrupted logistics and increased costs. Mid-2026 sees critical decisions required to mitigate these converging disruptions.

  • 01Hormuz tensions, Rhine's low water levels, and a U.S. robot import ban collectively strain global supply chains.
  • 02Mid-2026 presents complex challenges for supply chain operators due to simultaneous geopolitical and environmental disruptions.
  • 03Effective mitigation strategies are needed as cost pressures and logistical uncertainties increase for supply chains.

Aug 14, 2026

CMA CGM's acquisition of FedEx Supply Chain signals a new era of vertically integrated global logistics

CMA CGM's acquisition of FedEx Supply Chain signals a new era of vertically integrated global logistics

CMA CGM has acquired FedEx Supply Chain, marking a significant move towards vertically integrated logistics. This acquisition is part of broader trends impacting global logistics, including geopolitical tensions like Iran's Hormuz toll threat and strategic reviews by companies such as Kuehne+Nagel. These developments are shaping the logistics landscape for enterprise operators.

  • 01CMA CGM has acquired FedEx Supply Chain in a move towards vertically integrated logistics.
  • 02Geopolitical issues, such as Iran's Hormuz toll threat, are influencing global logistics.
  • 03Kuehne+Nagel is conducting a strategic review of its Apex division.

Aug 14, 2026

56% of chief supply chain officers call AI integration a major hurdle, and Starbucks' scrapped tool shows why

56% of chief supply chain officers call AI integration a major hurdle, and Starbucks' scrapped tool shows why

Integrating AI into supply chain operations is a significant challenge for 56% of chief supply chain officers, highlighted by Starbucks' decision to abandon its own AI tool. Successful AI implementation in supply chains requires overcoming specific hurdles to ensure budget efficiency.

  • 0156% of chief supply chain officers find AI integration a significant challenge.
  • 02Starbucks scrapped an AI tool, illustrating difficulties in successful implementation.
  • 03Efficiency in budget utilization is key for successful AI projects in supply chains.

Aug 14, 2026

Explore More Transportation Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Transportation.

Browse Transportation Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Transportation and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512