Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesTransportation

Tesla Seeks FCC Secrecy Extension as Radar Returns

Tesla is preparing to put radar technology back in its vehicles to supplement camera-based Full Self Driving systems after previously committing to vision-only technology. An FCC filing by Tesla's Certification Engineer seeks confidentiality to keep radar details private until Feb. 7, 2023.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Transportation teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Promoted content from Tesla on MarketScale.

· Transportation Post
Share

Key takeaways

01

Tesla is preparing to bring radar back to work alongside cameras after touting vision-only FSD.

02

Chuck Gershman says radar is robust day or night and in varied conditions, while cameras can degrade in low light and foul weather.

03

Chuck Gershman says radar-camera sensor fusion is an appropriate way to make hands-free driving systems safer.

Free workspace

Turn your Transportation expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Tesla radar technology is back in the news. Last year Elon Musk made it clear that Tesla was ditching its radar technology and that Full Self Driving (FSD) would be made safer by only using Vision, or camera-only, technology. However, Tesla’s Certification Engineer, Cindi Li, wrote to the FCC last week asking for a confidentiality extension as they prepare to put radars back in their vehicles.

Li’s letter asks for things such as manuals and photos to not be published until a new date of February 7th, 2023 as to “avoid any unnecessary disclosure or competitive harm before our product launch”. This request was filed just one day before filings would have been made public and was granted by the FCC.

Chuck Gershman, CEO of Owl Autonomous Imaging, says that radar technology should theoretically be the correct move in pursuit of FSD but doesn’t believe it’ll be the last change by Tesla along this route.

Chuck’s Thoughts on Tesla Radar Technology

“It’s just been announced that the Tesla vision plan, which previously claimed that the best way to achieve self-driving was through visual, camera-only based systems as their primary sensor. They’ve now reversed course, and they’re relaunching radar to supplement their camera systems.

And the question is this an appropriate course of action? In our opinion, yes, absolutely. Radar systems are quite robust and they operate across all environmental conditions and they operate day or night. Camera systems, on the other hand, have worked quite well but have degradation issues associated with environment.

And they degrade precipitously between daytime operation and nighttime operation. So a supplemental system or a fusion of sensors is an appropriate way to make systems safer, especially for hands-free driving. Now, is this the appropriate or the final step? We believe not so much.

Again, as we said, radars are quite robust and are a good complement to the camera system. But the degradation associated with the camera system specifically during nighttime operation or foul weather operation will compromise the system and we believe that Tesla needs to address this problem”

Tesla

Part of this channel

Tesla

Electric Vehicles, Solar & Clean Energy

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Transportation starts with a company putting its fleet managers, logistics engineers, and safety leads on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Fleet and logistics buyers compare quietly, and your operators become the evidence that settles it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Transportation, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Transportation: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Transportation buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Transportation expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your fleet managers, logistics engineers, and safety leads into the articles, video, and social content Transportation buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Transportation Insights

Exotec survey finds 94% of warehouse robot buyers say switching costs too much

Exotec survey finds 94% of warehouse robot buyers say switching costs too much

Exotec's survey of 250 North American automation decision-makers found one in four regret their warehouse automation choice. With 94% calling a switch prohibitively expensive, the contract stage shapes the next 10 to 15 years. The report ties disappointment to lifetime-cost estimates, repair accountability and readiness.

  • 01With 94% of buyers calling a switch prohibitively expensive, a warehouse automation choice works like a 10-to-15-year commitment, so cost and accountability terms set before signature carry the most weight.
  • 02Buyers of low-cost systems were nearly five times as likely to say they picked the wrong vendor (24% vs. 5%), and far fewer rated root-cause identification as fast (52% vs. 74%).
  • 03Internal readiness tracks with outcomes: early adopters with dedicated automation teams and leadership oversight reported a 1% wrong-vendor rate, against 11% for fast followers.

Nov 4, 2026

Port of Corpus Christi weighs a DP World container terminal and 2,000-acre hub

Port of Corpus Christi weighs a DP World container terminal and 2,000-acre hub

The Port of Corpus Christi outlined a 2,000-acre Robstown logistics hub and a potential DP World container terminal. Leaders tied the $625 million ship channel expansion—11.9 miles widened and deepened—to evaluating container ships for the first time. No terminal deal is signed yet.

  • 01The Port of Corpus Christi’s $625 million ship channel project expanded 11.9 miles of channel, putting container ships on the table.
  • 02The signal to watch is a signed DP World agreement and visible work at the 2,000-acre Robstown site. Those steps could turn the pitch into an option for routing plans.

Nov 3, 2026

Rail Traffic Is Up and Railcar Orders Have Flipped: The Equipment Cycle Is Turning

Rail Traffic Is Up and Railcar Orders Have Flipped: The Equipment Cycle Is Turning

Rail traffic has increased 8.5% with railcar orders now exceeding deliveries for two consecutive quarters, suggesting the equipment cycle is shifting toward tighter market conditions in 2026.

  • 01Rail traffic is up 8.5%
  • 02Railcar orders have outpaced deliveries for two quarters
  • 032026 is projected as the equipment cycle's low point

Nov 2, 2026

Explore More Transportation Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Transportation.

Browse Transportation Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Transportation and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512