Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

The Future of Education: NCEE’s Blueprint for Reinventing Schools

Founded in 1988, the NCEE (National Center on Education and the Economy) is a non-profit organization dedicated to helping states, districts, and schools discover, design, and lead high-performing education systems. The organization does this by studying school systems worldwide to gain insights into best practices and what does and does not work. The goal –…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Education Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Education Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Founded in 1988, the NCEE (National Center on Education and the Economy) is a non-profit organization dedicated to helping states, districts, and schools discover, design, and lead high-performing education systems. The organization does this by studying school systems worldwide to gain insights into best practices and what does and does not work. The goal – keep education systems in sync with the modern economy while creating the highest caliber of education. 

Michael B. Horn, author of the book From Reopen to Reinvent sat down with Vicki Phillips, CEO at NCEE, and Jason Dougal, President and COO at NCEE to discuss the organization’s Blueprint for a High-Performing Education System report. The conversation opened with an introduction of how Phillips and Dougal found their way to NCEE.  

Phillips impressive career includes stints at National Geographic, The Gates Foundation, and the PA State Department of Education. However, few people may know that her first job outside her home state of Kentucky was with NCEE. “One of the things I so valued that I learned there was the international benchmarking and the other work that the center was doing helped set for me when I went out to be a superintendent a north star of what really worked in practice,” said Phillips. 

Dougal on the other hand came to NCEE from an alternative path having begun his career in a Manhattan law firm doing mergers and acquisitions. In 2003, he met the people who were running the organization while working on a small transaction for them. “I got to know the organization as an outside attorney. I fell in love with the mission. I fell in love with the people. They invited me to join the organization a little less than 18 years ago,” Dougal said. Since then, he has worked in a variety of roles.  

Together, the three participants bring a wealth of expertise to a discussion focused on the NCEE Blueprint report which highlights 30+ years of insights into how schools can redesign systems to support high performance. The report focuses on the following: 

  • Excellence, Equity, and Efficiency 
  • Effective Teachers and Principals 
  • Rigorous and Adaptive Learning Systems 
  • Equitable Foundation of Supports
  • Coherent and Aligned Governance 

The conversation opens with a look at how higher-performing school systems tend to have fewer teacher preparation programs. The report notes that some states in the U.S. have over 50 programs. However, it would be optimal for states to have no more than ten.  

“What we noticed from our research and if you look at Finland where I believe there are seven maybe eight schools for teacher preparation, Singapore where there is a single one, Shanghai where there are just a couple – what you see in each of those jurisdictions is that the standard for teacher preparation is quite high. Therefore, only their most respected research universities have teacher prep programs,” explained Dougal.  

Fewer programs allow jurisdictions to control the flow of future teachers and keep standards high. In some countries, teacher applicants to training programs are accepted at a rate of 1 out of 10 or even 1 out of 20. It’s very different from the U.S. where academic standards for acceptance are lower and programs less challenging which drives some of the challenges within the profession. 

Phillips also noted that “as you might imagine, because expectations of the profession are high, the standards are high, satisfaction among teachers is also very high in those places.” 

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Education Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

Four ways the University of Michigan is transforming higher education

Four ways the University of Michigan is transforming higher education

The University of Michigan Center for Innovation (UMCI) in Detroit is establishing a new higher education model that combines interdisciplinary graduate programs, workforce development through gateway certificates, K-12 partnerships, and collaborative engagement with regional institutions and local businesses. The center aims to serve both Detroit residents and international students while addressing local workforce gaps in sectors like robotics, urban technology, and applied AI.

  • 01The University of Michigan is using its Center for Innovation in Detroit to offer interdisciplinary degrees, workforce certificates and K-12 programming aimed at sectors like robotics and AI.
  • 02The university's approach aims to better equip students for future employment challenges.
  • 03This transformation in education focuses on workforce preparation, inclusive access for Detroiters and interdisciplinary learning that tackles real-world challenges.

Sep 10, 2026

The Innovator at the Center of UMCI - Episode 2

The Innovator at the Center of UMCI - Episode 2

Scott Shireman, inaugural executive director of the University of Michigan Center for Innovation (UMCI), transitioned from the Bay Area to lead efforts positioning Detroit as a talent hub for innovation. His strategy centers on creating a "talent corridor" that connects the university with local tech hubs and institutions to drive both Detroit's economic revival and UMCI's global standing.

  • 01Scott Shireman spent a sabbatical at Coursera after Berkeley before joining UMCI, describing the startup experience as equivalent to earning a second MBA.
  • 02UMCI's strategy involves establishing connections between the University of Michigan, local tech hubs like Tech Town and New Lab, and community leaders to create a coordinated talent corridor.
  • 03Shireman aims to retain local Detroit talent while attracting global innovators by building an ecosystem that offers substantial job opportunities and improves quality of life.

Sep 10, 2026

AI detectors are turning into audit tools, not enforcement, in higher ed

AI detectors are turning into audit tools, not enforcement, in higher ed

AI detection tools can be used to review student writing, but their results are not definitive. In 2026, colleges are putting more emphasis on AI literacy, assessment redesign and clear guidance for acceptable AI use than on detection alone.

  • 0186% student AI use (Digital Education Council survey, cited by Community College Daily) makes “ban and catch” workflows expensive at scale. Training, course design, and tool governance become the controllable levers.
  • 02OECD’s 2026 Outlook warns that better-looking work with GenAI can disappear or reverse on exams without it, a signal that assessment design is now a learning-outcomes control, not a pedagogy preference.

Sep 7, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512