Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

A Deep Dive Into Unmanned Sea Vessels With An Industry Insider

After exploring the most recent innovations and challenges in the rapidly growing field of unmanned vehicles, MarketScale caught up with an industry insider to learn more about where this industry is heading. Jordan Springett has been working with unmanned surface vessels (USV) since 2012, with a focus on sailing robots at Ẳland Sailing Robots.[1] As…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Share
A Deep Dive Into Unmanned Sea Vessels With An Industry Insider

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Engineering & Construction?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Engineering & Construction coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

After exploring the most recent innovations and challenges in the rapidly growing field of unmanned vehicles, MarketScale caught up with an industry insider to learn more about where this industry is heading.

Jordan Springett has been working with unmanned surface vessels (USV) since 2012, with a focus on sailing robots at Ẳland Sailing Robots.[1] As a member of numerous research projects, Springett has experience in the software, mechanical, electrical engineering, and real world application sides of the field.

“I’ve published work on the subject,” Springett said. “Particularly with regard to collision avoidance at sea, which is currently an unsolved problem.”

In college, Springett joined a student group that put together robotic sailboats for racing.

“I joined them in my first year and ended up leading the group in my second,” Springett said. “Other work just fell out of that.”

That extracurricular rapidly grew into an exciting career.

Many are curious about which major players are worth watching in the field of unmanned sea vessels right now, but Springett said it is a bit more complicated than a list of names.

“There are three groups and I would say each has its major players,” Springett said. “There is the defense side, the commercial shipping side, and I guess what would be called the research side (environmental, climate, weather monitoring, as well as surveying.”

DARPA is responsible for the largest semi-autonomous vessel at sea, called the ACTUV “Sea Hunter” that is aimed at anti-submarine warfare.[2] Within commercial shipping, Norway’s Kongsberg recently acquired Rolls-Royce, consolidating into the sole player in marine business.

“On the research side, the side I mostly follow, the two big players in my books are Saildrone and ASV Global,” Springett said.

Saildrone has reportedly earned around $60 million in funding to grow its fleet and accelerate progress on wind-powered vessels.[3]

“Frankly, I think they are the really interesting people to watch out of all the groups as they actually have stuff (vessels) out there,” Springett said.

Yet despite the successful rounds of raising capital, Springett said that autonomous ocean technology is in a slow period.

“Most of the technology that ASVs are based on has been around for some time. However small, cheap and lower power electronics has certainly been a contributing factor,” he said.

According to Springett, the steady replacement of expensive components with newer, cheaper electronics is the chief factor driving growth.

But the tech slowdown does not mean the industry is resting on their laurels. Springett reported that a research vessel with crew can cost up to $90,000 a day, and that is a serious motivator for researchers and shippers alike.

“There is a huge amount of money to spend on the world’s oceans and it’s only going to grow,” he said.

The ASV industry has its share of unique challenges, but autonomous vehicles of all kinds are working on developing the software that will get the job done. Algorithms are the tool of the future, shaking up industries across sectors. This industry is no different. Powerful as they are, Springett and his colleagues are hard at work developing algorithms capable of, “not only handling the vessel but that can handle collision avoidance, particularly in congested areas such as harbours.”

As the technology gets cheaper and the software better, there remain other, less concrete problems for the industry. Maritime law is complex and, according to Springett, it does not account for autonomous vessels. Collision avoidance is of special concern with the laws being so dated and up for interpretation. As Uber’s roadside mishap last year showed, even rare accidents can have serious implications.

Jordan Springett is in the process of launching his own ASV business and paying close attention to developments in his corner of the field as well as the bigger picture.

Even at sea, the public’s trust issues are of concern.

“I think you are faced with the same issues as starting any business,” he said. “Acquiring funding and getting customers to trust that your product or service is up to the job.”

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Engineering & Construction starts with a company putting its project engineers, superintendents, and estimators on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Owners shortlist firms they already trust, and your field leaders become the reason your name is on that list.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Engineering & Construction Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your project engineers, superintendents, and estimators into the articles, video, and social content Engineering & Construction buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Engineering & Construction Insights

FAB 40 highlights top U.S. metal fabricators, including acquisitive Cadrex

The Fabricator’s 2023 FAB 40 ranks U.S. metal fabricators by reported revenue. PR Newswire reported Cadrex Manufacturing Solutions debuted at No. 2 with $480 million in 2022 revenue after a series of acquisitions, while MEC again held No. 1 with $539.4 million.

  • 01PR Newswire reported Cadrex Manufacturing Solutions entered The Fabricator’s 2023 FAB 40 at No. 2 after a series of acquisitions.
  • 02MEC’s long-running No. 1 position, with $539.4 million in reported 2022 revenue, reinforces what scale and repeatable process look like at the top of the list, according to PR Newswire.
  • 03PR Newswire flagged both material price inflation and demand as drivers of record revenues, buyers should press suppliers on what portion of growth was pricing versus volume.

Sep 6, 2026

HUD backs a 24-month study on mass-timber modules that ship and stack faster

HUD backs a 24-month study on mass-timber modules that ship and stack faster

HUD funded a 24-month Washington State University project on hybrid mass-timber modular housing. It targets transportability and faster site assembly. A 2023 Journal of Building Engineering review says 2D modular CLT tends to ship farther and build faster than 3D.

  • 01If transportation is the cost driver, HUD’s study plan points straight at the spec: treat the truck interface, tie-downs, and lifting points as part of the structural module design, not afterthought hardware.
  • 02The most actionable design fork in the CLT modular literature is 2D versus 3D: according to a 2023 Journal of Building Engineering review, 2D modules are typically moved longer distances and assembled faster on average.
  • 03Owners who want future change-of-use optionality can start writing it into module grids and connection details now. HUD-backed research is explicitly testing modules that can be repurposed across occupancies over their lifetime.

Sep 6, 2026

HUD’s 24-month mass timber modular project goes after the cost driver: shipping the modules

HUD’s 24-month mass timber modular project goes after the cost driver: shipping the modules

HUD is funding a 24-month Washington State University project to redesign modular housing modules around transport and fast site assembly. Shipping is the design constraint. A 2023 Journal of Building Engineering review of 2009–2021 modular CLT projects suggests faster construction timelines, but logistics choices still decide feasibility.

  • 01In modular housing, transportation is becoming a first-order engineering spec, the module that is cheapest to build can still be the most expensive to move.
  • 02The 2023 review found 2D modular CLT projects were, on average, transported farther and built faster than 3D ones, so configuration choice shapes both transport reach and install time.

Sep 5, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512