Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

Applying Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction with Max H. Cropper: Quicksilver

Training design and delivery is often relegated to a top performer who’s good with PowerPoint. From a cost savings perspective, this is an effective approach and many organizations have made do with pseudo-training designers. But, how is quality of learning affected if the training designer isn’t familiar with the scientific evidence on how…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Education Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Training design and delivery is often relegated to a top performer who’s good with PowerPoint. From a cost savings perspective, this is an effective approach and many organizations have made do with pseudo-training designers. But, how is quality of learning affected if the training designer isn’t familiar with the scientific evidence on how people learn and the best ways to teach them?

On today’s video episode of Quicksilver: A Behind the Scenes Look at The eLearning Alchemist Podcast host Clint Clarkson and guest Max H. Cropper, Ph. D discuss M. David Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction

  1. Problem-Centered Principle
  2. Activation Principle
  3. Demonstration Principle
  4. Application Principle
  5. Integration Principle

Collectively, these principles create one of the most effective instructional system design models for corporate learning. The principles put a high-emphasis on designing learning to get to the “doing” instead of having learners passively absorb knowledge.

“Really good instruction should be based on real-world tasks and real-world scenarios,” Max said. “Ultimately, it’s identifying within our situation, what is the best way to role out the demonstration, application, and integration of real-world tasks.”

Convincing businesses that training requires a stronger skill set than most subject matter expert can be challenging. However, we don’t need to look far to find some of the common instructional mistakes that The First Principles of Instruction aim to avoid:

  1. The Fire Hose – where learners are blasted with content without instructional interaction
  2. The Missing Link – where skills are described, but actual demonstration doesn’t take place
  3. The Remember What I Told You – where only surface or “remember-level” quizzing takes place without practice opportunities.
  4. And, more…

Max said, “By guiding people directly into demonstrations and application, you’ve got them hooked… People talk about learning engagement [but] it’s the real-world tasks that achieve engagement. If you pick the right tasks, the right scenarios, the right problems – the most important ones – then immediately you have engagement.”

Intuitively, we know that we learn better by doing, yet so much of today’s training still focuses on lecture, worksheets, and PowerPoint presentations. Organizations everywhere should be looking to their learning teams to apply The First Principle of Instruction and shift towards problem-centered learning.

Listen to Previous Episodes of The eLearning Alchemist!

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Education Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Education Technology Insights

EdTech deals rose 11% while the median funding round shrank 31%

EdTech deals rose 11% while the median funding round shrank 31%

EdTech deals rose 11% over the past year, while the median round shrank 31% and Series A rounds got scarcer. First financings nearly doubled. District and corporate learning buyers now face more seed-funded vendors, just as procurement asks for proof that students use the product and learn from it.

  • 01EdTech now has 37 first financings where it had 19, and a thinner Series A pipeline behind them: more products are starting, and fewer are getting the money to grow up.
  • 02For buyers, a vendor’s funding stage is now a due-diligence input alongside the evidence file: a seed-funded tool may be strong, but still lack the capital to deliver the integrations, implementation and ongoing support that larger deployments require.
  • 03In a two-year trial in 18 Tennessee middle schools, 96% of students tried the Khanmigo AI tutor, yet the median student messaged it on only a third of practice days. Usage logs are a sharper test of AI tutoring than access counts.

Nov 14, 2026

AI training and clear policies went with teacher confidence but not cheating worries, CWU survey finds

AI training and clear policies went with teacher confidence but not cheating worries, CWU survey finds

A Central Washington University survey of 222 high school math and English teachers found clear AI policies and useful training went with higher teacher confidence. Neither showed a link to morale or cheating worries. Districts should judge AI training by confidence and classroom practice, and handle integrity through assignment and tool design.

  • 01In this survey, clear AI policy and useful training went with higher teacher confidence and had no measurable link to morale or cheating worries. To address integrity concerns, the authors suggest focusing on how assignments and assessments are designed, alongside discipline-specific guidance.
  • 02English teachers reported the most integrity worry (83.7%) and also the most confidence teaching responsible AI use (45.5%). Subject may shape AI attitudes more than readiness does, which makes one AI course for every department a weak plan.

Nov 14, 2026

Kazakhstan’s Coursera award: 163,098 recognized university credits

Kazakhstan’s Coursera award: 163,098 recognized university credits

Kazakhstan's Ministry of Science and Higher Education won Coursera's Learning Excellence Award 2026 for building online courses into university programs. Since 2022, Kazakh universities have recognized 163,098 academic credits from Coursera coursework. Credits show what institutions accepted, not just what was bought.

  • 01Kazakh universities have recognized 163,098 academic credits for Coursera coursework since 2022, a harder-to-get benchmark of online learning being accepted into formal academic records.
  • 02A license count shows what was bought; a credit count shows what universities accepted onto a student record. Recognized credits capture a harder step than seats, hours or certificates.
  • 03The Kazakh model transfers most directly where the buyer of seats and the body that grants credit are closely tied; corporate learning teams need their own equivalent of a recognized credit, such as a role requirement or a training record.

Nov 13, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512