Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

Applying Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction with Max H. Cropper: Quicksilver

Training design and delivery is often relegated to a top performer who’s good with PowerPoint. From a cost savings perspective, this is an effective approach and many organizations have made do with pseudo-training designers. But, how is quality of learning affected if the training designer isn’t familiar with the scientific evidence on how…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Education Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Education Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Training design and delivery is often relegated to a top performer who’s good with PowerPoint. From a cost savings perspective, this is an effective approach and many organizations have made do with pseudo-training designers. But, how is quality of learning affected if the training designer isn’t familiar with the scientific evidence on how people learn and the best ways to teach them?

On today’s video episode of Quicksilver: A Behind the Scenes Look at The eLearning Alchemist Podcast host Clint Clarkson and guest Max H. Cropper, Ph. D discuss M. David Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction

  1. Problem-Centered Principle
  2. Activation Principle
  3. Demonstration Principle
  4. Application Principle
  5. Integration Principle

Collectively, these principles create one of the most effective instructional system design models for corporate learning. The principles put a high-emphasis on designing learning to get to the “doing” instead of having learners passively absorb knowledge.

“Really good instruction should be based on real-world tasks and real-world scenarios,” Max said. “Ultimately, it’s identifying within our situation, what is the best way to role out the demonstration, application, and integration of real-world tasks.”

Convincing businesses that training requires a stronger skill set than most subject matter expert can be challenging. However, we don’t need to look far to find some of the common instructional mistakes that The First Principles of Instruction aim to avoid:

  1. The Fire Hose – where learners are blasted with content without instructional interaction
  2. The Missing Link – where skills are described, but actual demonstration doesn’t take place
  3. The Remember What I Told You – where only surface or “remember-level” quizzing takes place without practice opportunities.
  4. And, more…

Max said, “By guiding people directly into demonstrations and application, you’ve got them hooked… People talk about learning engagement [but] it’s the real-world tasks that achieve engagement. If you pick the right tasks, the right scenarios, the right problems – the most important ones – then immediately you have engagement.”

Intuitively, we know that we learn better by doing, yet so much of today’s training still focuses on lecture, worksheets, and PowerPoint presentations. Organizations everywhere should be looking to their learning teams to apply The First Principle of Instruction and shift towards problem-centered learning.

Listen to Previous Episodes of The eLearning Alchemist!

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Education Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

AI tutoring is moving from “answer engines” to “process engines”, and K-12 buyers are starting to write that into the spec

AI tutoring is moving from “answer engines” to “process engines”, and K-12 buyers are starting to write that into the spec

AI tutoring is evolving from simply providing answers to facilitating the learning process. This shift is encouraging educational districts to integrate these advancements into their specifications, focusing on integrity, accessibility, and educational outcomes. The new approach emphasizes a Socratic method and rapid homework help to support process-based assessments.

  • 01AI tutoring is transitioning to focus on the learning process rather than just providing answers.
  • 02Educational districts are revising specifications to incorporate AI advancements with a focus on integrity and outcomes.
  • 03The emphasis on process-based assessments aligns with rapid homework solutions and the Socratic method.

Aug 24, 2026

The U.S. Department of Education’s edtech guidance turns “evidence” into a procurement requirement, even without new federal rules

The U.S. Department of Education’s edtech guidance turns “evidence” into a procurement requirement, even without new federal rules

The U.S. Department of Education has released a Dear Colleague letter that changes the criteria for districts when purchasing educational technology. The focus is now on demonstrating outcomes, evidence, and proof of implementation rather than just usage metrics like log-ins. This guidance emphasizes the importance of results and efficiency in edtech procurement.

  • 01Educational technology procurement requires proof of outcomes and efficiency.
  • 02Districts must provide evidence and proof of implementation when purchasing edtech.
  • 03Usage metrics like log-ins are no longer sufficient for edtech procurement justification.

Aug 23, 2026

Student success programs are colliding with student portals, and colleges are starting to run both like one system

Student success programs are colliding with student portals, and colleges are starting to run both like one system

Colleges are integrating student success programs with student portals to streamline their operations. The new SDX maturity model provides a framework for enhancing these digital journeys. Campus-level expansions are crucial for effective support program implementation.

  • 01Colleges are merging student success programs with student portals to create a unified system.
  • 02The SDX maturity model is a tool to improve digital journey management in education.
  • 03Campus-level expansions are essential for the successful implementation of support programs.

Aug 23, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512