Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

Applying Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction with Max H. Cropper: Quicksilver

Training design and delivery is often relegated to a top performer who’s good with PowerPoint. From a cost savings perspective, this is an effective approach and many organizations have made do with pseudo-training designers. But, how is quality of learning affected if the training designer isn’t familiar with the scientific evidence on how…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Education Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Education Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Training design and delivery is often relegated to a top performer who’s good with PowerPoint. From a cost savings perspective, this is an effective approach and many organizations have made do with pseudo-training designers. But, how is quality of learning affected if the training designer isn’t familiar with the scientific evidence on how people learn and the best ways to teach them?

On today’s video episode of Quicksilver: A Behind the Scenes Look at The eLearning Alchemist Podcast host Clint Clarkson and guest Max H. Cropper, Ph. D discuss M. David Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction

  1. Problem-Centered Principle
  2. Activation Principle
  3. Demonstration Principle
  4. Application Principle
  5. Integration Principle

Collectively, these principles create one of the most effective instructional system design models for corporate learning. The principles put a high-emphasis on designing learning to get to the “doing” instead of having learners passively absorb knowledge.

“Really good instruction should be based on real-world tasks and real-world scenarios,” Max said. “Ultimately, it’s identifying within our situation, what is the best way to role out the demonstration, application, and integration of real-world tasks.”

Convincing businesses that training requires a stronger skill set than most subject matter expert can be challenging. However, we don’t need to look far to find some of the common instructional mistakes that The First Principles of Instruction aim to avoid:

  1. The Fire Hose – where learners are blasted with content without instructional interaction
  2. The Missing Link – where skills are described, but actual demonstration doesn’t take place
  3. The Remember What I Told You – where only surface or “remember-level” quizzing takes place without practice opportunities.
  4. And, more…

Max said, “By guiding people directly into demonstrations and application, you’ve got them hooked… People talk about learning engagement [but] it’s the real-world tasks that achieve engagement. If you pick the right tasks, the right scenarios, the right problems – the most important ones – then immediately you have engagement.”

Intuitively, we know that we learn better by doing, yet so much of today’s training still focuses on lecture, worksheets, and PowerPoint presentations. Organizations everywhere should be looking to their learning teams to apply The First Principle of Instruction and shift towards problem-centered learning.

Listen to Previous Episodes of The eLearning Alchemist!

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Education Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

upGrad’s all-stock Unacademy deal makes integration capacity the scarce resource in India’s edtech consolidation

upGrad’s all-stock Unacademy deal makes integration capacity the scarce resource in India’s edtech consolidation

upGrad has acquired Unacademy in an all-stock deal valued at approximately ₹2,055 crore, with the acquisition having received approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI). An additional acquisition of Internshala by upGrad is pending. The primary focus for upGrad following these acquisitions will be on effectively integrating these companies into its operations.

  • 01upGrad acquired Unacademy for approximately ₹2,055 crore after receiving CCI approval.
  • 02A pending acquisition of Internshala by upGrad is also underway.
  • 03Integration capacity is a critical factor in the consolidation of India's edtech sector.

Aug 22, 2026

AI agents are quietly rewriting school procurement, starting with the shopping cart

AI agents are quietly rewriting school procurement, starting with the shopping cart

AI agents are transforming school procurement by altering how educational institutions approach purchasing decisions. They are creating a new framework for K-12 AI purchasing and governance. District buyers and consumer AI-agent tests highlight emerging requirements in this field.

  • 01AI agents are influencing changes in school procurement processes.
  • 02New requirements for K-12 AI purchasing and governance are emerging.
  • 03District buyers are developing frameworks to manage AI purchasing.

Aug 22, 2026

U.S. institutions pay $2,000–$3,500 per enrolled international student as agency commission models shift away from gross-tuition percentages

U.S. institutions pay $2,000–$3,500 per enrolled international student as agency commission models shift away from gross-tuition percentages

A recent survey conducted by AIRC shows that U.S. educational institutions are increasingly adopting fixed-fee and net-tuition models for agency commissions instead of traditional percentage commissions. These institutions pay approximately $2,000 to $3,500 for each enrolled international student. The survey analyzed responses from 61 institutions across 26 states.

  • 01Educational institutions in the U.S. pay $2,000–$3,500 per international student as agency commission.
  • 02Fixed-fee and net-tuition models are gaining popularity over traditional percentage-based commissions.
  • 03The AIRC survey included 61 institutions from 26 different states.

Aug 12, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512