Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Education Technology

Assessment in Our Education System: A Barrier and an Opportunity

In today’s time-based education system, Students take tests and receive assessments based on those results. But what are the takeaways and feedback for students? Do students understand the results, where they went right, or where they went wrong? What are the quality levels of these assessments, and do they provide opportunities to improve a…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

In today’s time-based education system, Students take tests and receive assessments based on those results. But what are the takeaways and feedback for students? Do students understand the results, where they went right, or where they went wrong? What are the quality levels of these assessments, and do they provide opportunities to improve a student’s learning? Perhaps there are ways to improve the process.

The Future of Education’s Michael Horn believes a different model for assessments that include shorter, more frequent testing for and of learning could be a way to break down the barriers and lead to better results.

Horn’s guest, Arthur Vanderveen, CEO of New Meridian Corporation, knows a lot about changing the paradigm of assessments in the education system. His work propels the system forward to a more learner-centered vision.

“I developed my expertise with assessment when I was at the college board and when I led assessments for the New York City Department of Education. I also had the opportunity to help launch and run the Innovation Zone under then chancellor Joel Kline,” Vanderveen said. “An interesting intersection, because the I Zone was all about how can we develop and support schools in developing more student-centered, personalized learning models, doing that work while also running all of the assessment programs for the New York City Department of Education.”

Horn and Vanderveen discuss…

The current state of state assessments

How are present-day assessments holding education back from innovative approaches

How New Meridian is working to shape and improve the curriculum, learning, testing, and assessment process

“It’s ridiculous how much money states spend on customized end-of-year assessments that are all essentially measuring the same standards,” Vanderveen said. “Yet every state creates its own custom assessment underlying our model in all subjects. States

should be able to share assessment items and realize those efficiencies by licensing content and using that in their state.”

Arthur Vanderveen is a highly effective leader who integrates strategy, talent management, and disciplined execution to create successful, sustainable, and profitable enterprises. His 20 years of leadership experience in business development, strategic partnerships, and product management in K-12 education focuses on fostering strategic public-private partnerships that deliver innovative products and services to K-12 schools. Vanderveen holds a B.A. in English from Colorado College, M.Div. in Educational Psychology & Theology from Princeton Theological Seminary, and a Ph.D. in English from The University of Texas at Austin.

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Education Technology companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

Raptor Technologies has transitioned from visitor management to enhancing student well-being with its StudentSafe platform. This move addresses school district needs for improved behavioral threat assessment. StudentSafe is designed to bolster educational security and student safety.

  • 01Raptor Technologies is expanding into student well-being.
  • 02The StudentSafe platform focuses on behavioral threat assessment.
  • 03StudentSafe responds to demands from school district customers.

Jun 26, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

New York City schools have mandated that every AI tool undergo a bias and equity review before being deployed within their systems. This move comes amid broader concerns and debates about the role of AI in education, particularly concerning its impact on cognitive development. The education sector is actively assessing the potential benefits and risks associated with AI technologies in classrooms.

  • 01NYC schools require AI tools to pass a bias and equity review.
  • 02Concerns about AI in education include impacts on cognitive development.
  • 03Policymakers are reconsidering the place of AI in classrooms.

Jun 17, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

Twenty-nine New York City council members are demanding a two-year halt to AI use in the nation's largest school system, citing student data privacy gaps. Simultaneously, California and other states are tightening AI bias-audit requirements for employers, while educators debate a deeper question: whether AI adopted without guardrails erodes the original human thinking it is meant to support.

  • 01Twenty-nine NYC council members sent a letter on June 9, 2026, calling for a two-year AI moratorium in city schools, citing inadequate student data privacy protections in the Department of Education's drafted guidance.
  • 02California's Civil Rights Council AI regulations, effective Oct. 1, 2025, require employers using automated decision systems to retain related data for four years and face heightened litigation risk if they skip bias audits.
  • 03Educators and practitioners are wrestling with a fundamental design question: whether AI functions as a 'calculator'—executing tasks users already understand—or a 'crane' that extends human capacity into genuinely new territory.

Jun 17, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub