Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

Barriers to Women in Tech Spaces and How to Break Them

Previously, education was for only the male gender. Therefore, it is no wonder that women in tech have to work much harder for recognition of their skills. A study from 2020 shows women constituted about 28.8% of the technology workforce, an increase from 25.9% and 26.2% in 2018 and 2019, respectively. It is no…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from DisruptED on MarketScale.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Education Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

 
Previously, education was for only the male gender. Therefore, it is no wonder that women in tech have to work much harder for recognition of their skills. A study from 2020 shows women constituted about 28.8% of the technology workforce, an increase from 25.9% and 26.2% in 2018 and 2019, respectively.

It is no question that there is an apparent digital gender gap. So, what are the barriers to women in technology, and how do we bridge that gap?

On today’s episode of DisruptED, host Ron J Stefanski sits down with Kelly Ireland, the CEO of CBT, to discuss strategies to overcome the barriers to women in the technological spaces.

Ireland mentioned that inclusivity and nurturing skills from a young age were core strategies to remove the barriers to women’s involvement in tech spaces. One of the things that helped her in the early days of her career was that she was always carried along. She had a boss who emphasized including the female employees in training so they could have the same knowledge as the men, hence equal opportunity to advance.

“Many women need the right motivation to excel within the technological space”, noted Ireland. “I have enjoyed a successful career because I have always adopted the problem-solving approach. Also, I think that women are natural problem solvers, so it is no doubt that they will do well in tech careers. One of the ways I coped as a woman in tech back in the day was by walking around with blinders- as long as I got the necessary knowledge and skill, I believed I could do it,” explained Ireland.

Stefanski and Ireland during their discussion on women in tech…

● Ireland’s passion for helping others

● Her value-add approach in working with clients and how it has affected the growth of CBT

● A possible way of scheduling more meetings in the future as Ireland is a female force in the technology space

“I am passionate because of my history, so I understand the pain. In addition, helping women in tech promotes inclusivity. I hope that in the near future, being a female will not be a reason to experience hurt and setbacks in certain “men-dominated fields.” A great concept will be introducing the younger ones to tech early so they can nurture their appetite. Many kids seemingly do not do well because they are bored or need to explore technical fields. The children need to see the impact of technology,” explained Ireland. Guiding people, especially kids, give them the courage to explore skills in tech and reduce barriers to inclusivity.

Kelly Ireland is a Tech Founder, CEO, and adviser. She is an award-winning entrepreneur who launched her tech company- CBT, in 2001. Some of her accolades include the 2015 HP PartnerOne Solution Provider of the Year Award for Cloud, CRN’s prestigious Triple Crown Award in 2016 and 2019, nine consecutive Boeing Performance Excellence awards, and CRN’s inaugural IoT Innovators Award in 2017, 2018, and 2019. Also, in 2020, she was named IoT Community 2022 Woman of the Year.

DisruptED

Part of this channel

DisruptED

Education, workforce, and manufacturing futures with Ron J. Stefanski.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Education Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Education Technology Insights

EdTech deals rose 11% while the median funding round shrank 31%

EdTech deals rose 11% while the median funding round shrank 31%

EdTech deals rose 11% over the past year, while the median round shrank 31% and Series A rounds got scarcer. First financings nearly doubled. District and corporate learning buyers now face more seed-funded vendors, just as procurement asks for proof that students use the product and learn from it.

  • 01EdTech now has 37 first financings where it had 19, and a thinner Series A pipeline behind them: more products are starting, and fewer are getting the money to grow up.
  • 02For buyers, a vendor's funding stage is now a working input to due diligence, alongside the evidence file: a seed-funded tool may be excellent and still lack the capital to build integrations and support for a whole district.
  • 03In a two-year trial in 18 Tennessee middle schools, 96% of students tried the Khanmigo AI tutor, yet the median student messaged it on only a third of practice days. Usage logs are a sharper test of AI tutoring than access counts.

Nov 14, 2026

AI training and clear policies went with teacher confidence but not cheating worries, CWU survey finds

AI training and clear policies went with teacher confidence but not cheating worries, CWU survey finds

A Central Washington University survey of 222 high school math and English teachers found clear AI policies and useful training went with higher teacher confidence. Neither showed a link to morale or cheating worries. Districts should judge AI training by confidence and classroom practice, and handle integrity through assignment and tool design.

  • 01In this survey, clear AI policy and useful training went with higher teacher confidence and had no measurable link to morale or cheating worries. To address integrity concerns, the authors suggest focusing on how assignments and assessments are designed, alongside discipline-specific guidance.
  • 02English teachers reported the most integrity worry (83.7%) and also the most confidence teaching responsible AI use (45.5%). Subject may shape AI attitudes more than readiness does, which makes one AI course for every department a weak plan.

Nov 14, 2026

Kazakhstan’s Coursera award: 163,098 recognized university credits

Kazakhstan’s Coursera award: 163,098 recognized university credits

Kazakhstan's Ministry of Science and Higher Education won Coursera's Learning Excellence Award 2026 for building online courses into university programs. Since 2022, Kazakh universities have recognized 163,098 academic credits from Coursera coursework. Credits show what institutions accepted, not just what was bought.

  • 01Kazakh universities have recognized 163,098 academic credits for Coursera coursework since 2022, a harder-to-get benchmark of online learning being accepted into formal academic records.
  • 02A license count shows what was bought; a credit count shows what universities accepted onto a student record. Recognized credits capture a harder step than seats, hours or certificates.
  • 03The Kazakh model transfers most directly where the buyer of seats and the body that grants credit are closely tied; corporate learning teams need their own equivalent of a recognized credit, such as a role requirement or a training record.

Nov 13, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512