Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Education Technology

Building Better Pathways to Advance Opportunities

How many schools did you consider when deciding what college to attend, if you went that route? Twenty, ten, five, or two? Maybe you already knew the one you would attend from the start. But guess what? There are almost 4,000 schools, including branch campuses, where you can earn an undergraduate degree in the U.S….

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from The Future of Education with Michael Horn on MarketScale.

Share

How many schools did you consider when deciding what college to attend, if you went that route? Twenty, ten, five, or two? Maybe you already knew the one you would attend from the start. But guess what? There are almost 4,000 schools, including branch campuses, where you can earn an undergraduate degree in the U.S. With the decision of which of the 4,000 schools to choose, there’s also the pressure of choosing one that will set you up for the best financial success, considering the average federal, not private, school loan debt for undergraduates is $37,574.

With so many choices and so much college debt floating around, how is a potential college student to know which program at which school will set them up for the most career and financial success?

On today’s episode of The Future of Education, host Michael B. Horn speaks with Matt Sigelman, President of The Burning Glass Institute, to talk about how college rankings play into the financial success of graduates, and how students can choose the best school for their personal pathway to set them on the ideal fiscal journey.

With the average cost of an in-state four-year public degree for a student living on campus is $102,828 and the average cost of a private, four-year nonprofit degree is $218,004. So, it’s safe to say that students need to pay close attention to how much they will be paying and how much their income projections post-grad are to allow them to make the right school and program choice.

“I don’t believe that the world necessarily needs more college rankings. But I do believe that learners deserve transparency into the kind of outcomes they can expect. Not every student going into school knows what she wants to do on the other side…But for those who do have an ambition, and I think that’s increasingly important, given the high cost of college debt that students find themselves saddled with—how do you know which schools are going to place you farthest toward that ambition?” said Sigelman.

Horn and Sigelman also discussed…

  1. Some of the top and bottom university performers in graduate earnings by disciplines
  2. How social capital plays into post-graduate earnings
  3. Which pathways individuals will have more financial success with by not pursuing a degree

“The success of graduates is defined at a three-way intersection between the program that set your major, the school you go to, and the skills you acquire,” Sigelman explained. He added, “So, there is a big difference in any program of study between where you’re at a highly selective institution or a non-selective institution. There’s also a big difference between what program of study you’re in … You would rather be a tech or engineering major at a totally non-selective institution, at a regional public or four-year community college, or what have you, than pretty much any other major at the most selective institutions.”

Matt Sigelman is the President of The Burning Glass Institute, Chairman of Lightcast, and Visiting Fellow at Harvard University Kennedy School of Government. He has been published numerous times in high-profile publications such as The Wall Street Journal, Harvard Business Review, The Hechinger Report, and the American Enterprise Institute. Sigelman attended Princeton University, where he earned an AB from the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, and Harvard Business School, where he earned his MBA.

The Future of Education with Michael Horn

Part of this channel

The Future of Education with Michael Horn

Michael Horn interviews the people redesigning how students learn

Visit the channel →

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Education Technology companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

Raptor Technologies has transitioned from visitor management to enhancing student well-being with its StudentSafe platform. This move addresses school district needs for improved behavioral threat assessment. StudentSafe is designed to bolster educational security and student safety.

  • 01Raptor Technologies is expanding into student well-being.
  • 02The StudentSafe platform focuses on behavioral threat assessment.
  • 03StudentSafe responds to demands from school district customers.

Jun 26, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

New York City schools have mandated that every AI tool undergo a bias and equity review before being deployed within their systems. This move comes amid broader concerns and debates about the role of AI in education, particularly concerning its impact on cognitive development. The education sector is actively assessing the potential benefits and risks associated with AI technologies in classrooms.

  • 01NYC schools require AI tools to pass a bias and equity review.
  • 02Concerns about AI in education include impacts on cognitive development.
  • 03Policymakers are reconsidering the place of AI in classrooms.

Jun 17, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

Twenty-nine New York City council members are demanding a two-year halt to AI use in the nation's largest school system, citing student data privacy gaps. Simultaneously, California and other states are tightening AI bias-audit requirements for employers, while educators debate a deeper question: whether AI adopted without guardrails erodes the original human thinking it is meant to support.

  • 01Twenty-nine NYC council members sent a letter on June 9, 2026, calling for a two-year AI moratorium in city schools, citing inadequate student data privacy protections in the Department of Education's drafted guidance.
  • 02California's Civil Rights Council AI regulations, effective Oct. 1, 2025, require employers using automated decision systems to retain related data for four years and face heightened litigation risk if they skip bias audits.
  • 03Educators and practitioners are wrestling with a fundamental design question: whether AI functions as a 'calculator'—executing tasks users already understand—or a 'crane' that extends human capacity into genuinely new territory.

Jun 17, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub