Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

The State of K-12 Cyber Safety & Security: Student Data Privacy in Remote Learning

Katie Fritchen is the Senior Marketing Director for ManagedMethods, where this post originally appeared. Districts are struggling to address the unique challenges presented by student data privacy in today’s remote learning environments. A white paper by McGraw-Hill Education defines student data privacy as, “…the use, collection, handling and governance of students’ personally identifiable information (PII).” The white paper identifies…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share
The State of K-12 Cyber Safety & Security: Student Data Privacy in Remote Learning

Free workspace

Turn your Education Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Katie Fritchen is the Senior Marketing Director for ManagedMethods, where this post originally appeared.

Districts are struggling to address the unique challenges presented by student data privacy in today’s remote learning environments. A white paper by McGraw-Hill Education defines student data privacy as, “…the use, collection, handling and governance of students’ personally identifiable information (PII).” The white paper identifies specific types of information including:

  • Name and address
  • Student ID
  • Login information
  • Academic, health, and disciplinary records
  • Demographics and birthdate

This type of information is interesting to a variety of users, some criminal, and others (unfortunately) not so much. The issue of why student data privacy is important can generally be boiled down to two reasons. First, so children don’t become victims of identity theft, sextortion, and other types of cybercrime. Hackers can use PII singly or in combination to identify, find, and contact students.

The second reason is so that companies can’t use the information to build profiles on children throughout their lives, impacting their ability to go to college, get a good job, get good credit, etc. There’s also concern that companies will use student data to influence their purchasing decisions, among other things.

School district leaders are understandably concerned about protecting student data to keep their students safe from a variety of dangers. Two dangers stand out among the rest.

The (practically) overnight migration to K-12 remote learning and working due to COVID-19 made cloud security and student data privacy issues more apparent. But the truth is that the problems were already there, lurking behind a false sense of security provided by firewalls and content filters.

That is why we’re taking this look at the state of K-12 cyber safety and security through a remote learning lens, and hosting a panel discussion with Doug Levin at The K-12 Cybersecurity Resource Center and two K-12 IT professionals who are working through these—and many other challenges—that tech pros are facing today.

Why Student Data Privacy Matters

Cyber safety and student data privacy is not just a school issue. It affects parents, students, and society. School districts see two critical reasons to protect student data. All school districts must comply with student data privacy regulations, and they must also protect students’ health and wellbeing.

Student Data Privacy Compliance

Student data privacy laws are in place to try to protect our children, but a confusing jumble of regulations is often the result. The Federal government and individual states have passed regulations governing the collection, storage, and use of student data. For example, schools need to comply with the following Federal regulations:

  • Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
  • Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA)
  • Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)

Additionally, 49 states have passed 400 pieces of legislation to address state-specific issues between 2013 and 2016. The combination of Federal and state regulations often launches district IT teams into a challenging juggling act. Now there’s the issue of student data privacy in remote learning that is making the compliance landscape even more complex.

Protecting Students’ Health and Wellbeing

Children are among the most vulnerable to internet scams. Since school districts store an extensive amount of student data, they are a prime target for cybercriminals according to 2019 cyber safety and security research.

When hackers steal student data, it can result in harm to students from threats to their safety, student identity theft, and a variety of other scams that threaten our children’s health and wellbeing.

What Makes Student Data Privacy in Remote Learning Different?

The rush to offer remote learning as the COVID-19 pandemic closed schools resulted in a remarkable edtech migration. School districts across the country did an amazing job of going from classroom to remote teaching approaches. However, that transition created a number of issues when it comes to data security and student data privacy. Because district staff had to, understandably, focus on remote learning enablement, accessibility, and support, few were able to stop and think through how to secure student data in this environment.

Unvetted EdTech Threats

One of the most critical threats is that almost overnight teachers, students, and staff began using a wide variety of remote learning resources, sometimes including risky EdTech. Unfortunately, in most cases, district IT teams didn’t have the chance to vet those resources for security and student data privacy compliance properly.

As a result, remote learning security risks are finding their way into district G Suite and Microsoft 365 environments. These risks increase your district’s vulnerability to ransomware, account takeovers, and data security issues. And, once that happens, threats to students’ health and wellbeing increases along with the likelihood that your district isn’t complying with privacy legislation.

Lack of Visibility and Control Over Cloud Applications

Most district IT teams work to protect the district’s network by focusing on firewalls and content filters. But, they don’t have visibility and control over applications that operate outside the district’s network. That raises another critical problem now that remote learning has increased the number of students, teachers, and staff using cloud-based systems such as G Suite and Microsoft 365.

You can’t protect those cloud-based systems using traditional network security tools—particularly in remote learning situations when they’re being accessed from outside of the school network. District IT leaders and admins are working to address the unique data security and student data privacy challenges that remote learning on a large scale has presented.

Join us for a free webinar to participate in a panel discussion with two respected K-12 District IT leaders and the founder of The K-12 Cybersecurity Resource Center discuss the lessons that they’ve learned in making the transition to remote learning and how they’re planning for different contingencies in the 2020/21 school year.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Education Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Education Technology Insights

From AI Governance to Guardrails with Hood College's April Boulton

From AI Governance to Guardrails with Hood College's April Boulton

Hood College built an AI task force that intentionally included skeptics alongside early adopters, producing a two-layer policy with campus guardrails and room for discipline- and unit-specific rules. The policy restricts sensitive data and student work to vetted, licensed tools, while assessment guidance varies by discipline through workshops, and Hood is not using AI detection software.

  • 01Task force co-chairs actively recruited faculty skeptics—including an ethics critic and a tech educator—to sit alongside enthusiasts; the resulting friction shaped discussions on syllabus rules and assessment.
  • 02Campus environmental scan showed over 40% faculty and staff participation, with respondents requesting clear policy plus discipline flexibility rather than either a college-wide ban or a free-for-all.
  • 03Hood’s two-layer policy limits sensitive data and student work to college-vetted, licensed tools, and professional development reinforces the approved-tools list.

Nov 5, 2026

Qweebi, already in 5,200 schools, raises $500K to win US districts

Qweebi, already in 5,200 schools, raises $500K to win US districts

Qweebi, a browser-based engineering and robotics platform for grades 3 to 8, raised a $500,000 seed round led by Inflection Point Ventures. Its 5,200-plus US schools came largely through teacher sign-ups.

  • 01Listed project run times range from 2 hours to 4.5 hours, so the schedule a STEM coordinator plans around depends on which project is picked, not the 2–3 hour headline.

Nov 3, 2026

Ball State's 36 new Corsair PCs are built for esports and creative software

Ball State's 36 new Corsair PCs are built for esports and creative software

Corsair supplied Ball State University's Esports Center with 36 PCs, each with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti graphics card, 64 GB of memory and a 320 Hz display. The spec serves two kinds of users. Memory sized for Maya and Unreal Engine sits beside displays built for competitive play. Ball State says the upgrade gives students access to technology used in media production, animation and game development.

  • 01For a shared esports and media lab, let the heaviest course software set memory, and esports needs set the display and GPU.
  • 02Ball State expects its largest esports participation in 2026-27 since the program’s first year, and that count is the next test of demand.

Oct 31, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512