Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Can Intermittent Fasting Help You Lose Weight And Provide Other Health Benefits?

While it has been widely promoted as a weight loss strategy, research suggests that intermittent fasting may have broader benefits for overall health and well-being. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that Intermittent Fasting can help lower blood pressure, improve insulin sensitivity, and reduce the risk of chronic diseases such…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

While it has been widely promoted as a weight loss strategy, research suggests that intermittent fasting may have broader benefits for overall health and well-being. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that Intermittent Fasting can help lower blood pressure, improve insulin sensitivity, and reduce the risk of chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease.

Another study in the journal Cell Metabolism found that Intermittent Fasting can increase the production of a protein called brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which is essential for the growth and maintenance of neurons in the brain.

Despite these promising findings, new research found that intermittent fasting may not be as beneficial for weight loss as previously thought while another study found that that it does not bring the same health benefits as other weight loss programs.

These new findings leave lots of questions unanswered. Does intermittent fasting help with weight loss and provide other health benefits or is it just another fad diet targeted to those who are looking to lose weight? Kimberly Gomer, director of nutrition at Body Beautiful Miami, is a leading nutritional expert in weight loss and medical nutrition for over 2 decades. She brings her years of experience to the discussion and offers her in-depth analysis of this dietary strategy.

Kim’s Thoughts:

I love this article on intermittent fasting because it brings to light an unknown idea for a lot of people. I do believe from the science, looking at the science, that there is benefit to time-restricted eating. So, you’re fasting for a certain amount of time and then you’re eating. The idea that immune autophagy maintaining muscle mass is a possibility with fasting.

But the exciting part for me as a nutritionist is the stability of blood sugar. Because high insulin levels, high blood sugars are a huge problem in the United States—we are looking at one in three people with prediabetes. We are looking at one in 10 people with diabetes, and we are looking at one in five people who don’t even know they have it.

So, this idea that we can lower insulin levels and we can stabilize blood sugar and do it through an intermittent fasting lifestyle, is amazing. And part of the science behind it is that when you are not eating, be it sleeping or just not eating, your insulin is very low. It’s the lowest when you’re not eating so allowing for a time that you are not eating in your day to be extended and eating only in a certain window, there are a lot of health benefits.

The problem that I see with some of these articles and understanding how they would apply to you as an individual is the fasting times are all over the place. Are you fasting for 18 hours a day? Are you fasting for 16 hours a day? Are you fasting for 12 hours a day?

Is your eating window very short? One to three hours or long eight hours. So, this idea of what is the best fasting and eating window is still not clear in some of the research, and more important in my mind, yes, intermittent fasting is a great tool. I use it in my private practice as a dietician with a lot of success.

But one thing that has to come with it is what are you eating? We live in a world of obesogenic food, highly processed, unhealthy food. So, some of my clients actually think, some people think well I can fast for 20 hours and for four hours I can go and eat fast food and eat junk, and I’m going to be healthy and thin. Not true.

So, I love intermittent fasting, I think we need more and more research about it. I think people need to be clear about what will work for them, how the tool can work for them as an individual, and more importantly, be clear about what they’re actually eating during their window. Again, I’m going to say I think that intermittent fasting is an awesome tool.

I’m so happy to see research being published. More research needs to be done and I think it can be very useful for a lot of people. Thank you.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Underpayments in healthcare revenue cycle operations lack the visibility of denied claims because they don't trigger alerts or queue workflows. Without dedicated ownership and line-level verification against contract terms, paid claims that fall short of their contractual amount pass through undetected.

  • 01Denial workflows activate on rejection events, but underpayments produce no event, leaving paid claims unverified by default.
  • 02The speaker says many provider groups lack line-level contract intelligence to check each paid line against the applicable terms.
  • 03Payment received and payment checked are separate tasks: one verifies acceptance, the other verifies correctness—and the second often has no assigned owner.

Nov 6, 2026

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero payment on a claim line isn't automatically an underpayment; contract terms, particularly packaging rules, determine whether zero is correct. Chasing unsupported findings damages credibility with payers and weakens the position of legitimate disputes, so revenue cycle teams must verify the full contract terms and effective dates before treating any payment difference as a finding.

  • 01When a contract packages add-ons into the primary procedure, the add-on line may legitimately show zero payment because it is folded into the primary procedure reimbursement.
  • 02Pursuing payment differences that lack contract support burns credibility with payers and can weaken the team’s position on later disputes, including valid ones.
  • 03Always verify the complete contract terms, fee schedules, carve-outs, amendments, and the specific version in effect on the date of service before treating a payment variance as a recoverable underpayment.

Nov 6, 2026

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

Practices can receive payment on closed, clean claims that still fall short of negotiated contract amounts because billing ends at coding, submission and posting, while no role owns checking whether payer payments match fee schedules. The speaker argues that contract-level payment review is a separate, complementary function that compares closed claims to contract terms and, run continuously, helps surface shortfalls in time to act within timely filing windows.

  • 01Correctly coded and billed healthcare claims can still result in underpayment.
  • 02Check closed-claim payments against contract terms to find underpayments.
  • 03Discrepancies in claim payments can persist despite adherence to billing protocols.

Nov 6, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512