Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

HIMSS 2023: Providers and Payers Maneuver “Too Much Data,” SDOH Initiatives, and “Hospital in the Home”

HIMSS 2023 was the host of several industry-defining conversations for the healthcare industry, including reflections on the growth of data use in healthcare and the evolution of how and where care is administered. The evolution of the healthcare marketplace has resulted in the saturation of data among multiple areas. As a result, the healthcare…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

HIMSS 2023 was the host of several industry-defining conversations for the healthcare industry, including reflections on the growth of data use in healthcare and the evolution of how and where care is administered.

The evolution of the healthcare marketplace has resulted in the saturation of data among multiple areas. As a result, the healthcare industry must be innovative in devising ways to channel this data in a meaningful way to serve their customers efficiently. From operations to validity and privacy, measures need to be taken to find a safe place for this data to reside.

Health equity and new initiatives buzzing around the retail community are sparking the possibility of ‘hospital in the home.’ The development of such programs will not only open more space in local hospitals but create a more comfortable environment for patients to recover in their own homes, giving healthcare organizations opportunities to channel data through remote devices.

Jonathan Wiik, Vice President of Healthcare Analytics at FinThrive, shares his takeaways from HIMSS 2023, and how these data and health equity goals are shaping out for payers and providers. has a great opportunity to capitalize on the dispersion of these different data sets, serving as a broker for these data transactions.

Jonathan’s Thoughts

“Spent the last four days here at HIMSS 2023. A lot of different themes I heard when I was here. Data, I would argue that the market is starting to realize it probably has too much data, trying to figure out exactly where it needs to go, right person, right time, right place to derive better outcomes with care and payment.

Sat in on several sessions today just understanding interoperability rules, data integrity rules, data validation rules, privacy rules, operationalizing where all that data needs to live and why.

From the payment side, saw lots and lots of discussions surrounding payer and provider transactions and what that looks like from a accountability standpoint. From the provider side of the payers, really want some transparency going back to the provider community surrounding payment rules and following that so they could do their jobs at managing care. Heard SDOH a lot. That was a buzzword two or three years ago. It’s back, baby. Social determinants of health is I think front and center as you’re looking at DEI and health equity initiatives.

I interviewed Alex Wendling from Utica University this morning, and he talked about how he has taken some data sets in state of New York and looked at how some of these social determinants datas can really drive health equity through Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and what matters and why it’s important to understand those data sets and driving care.

Also talked with a gentleman, Geoffrey Roche, about some work that he’s done with AARP and in the state of Pennsylvania surrounding health equity and really being culturally competent at your organization to where you’re meeting the needs of others.

I’ve sat in on several sessions: Walmart, Best Buy, and all of those folks are here from the retail community really talking about hospital in the home. That’s another big theme I’ve heard here this week and where you’re seeing reimbursement kind of drive where they’re going to put technology. So hospitals are funding that infrastructure in terms of iPads, ethernet, those types of things to where patients can get better where they probably are the most comfortable which is right on their couch at home.

I’ve seen lots of discussions about prior authorization, some of the rules that are out there, that’s probably the bane of existence of most of the parties here, both on the payer and provider side. I think there’s huge opportunities for FinThrive in this space as we operate a lot in those data sets, are responsible for brokering a lot of those transactions between patient, provider, and payer, and looking really forward to taking a lot of these insights and applying them through our technologies as we move forward.”

Article written by Nakita Rowell-Stevens.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Underpayments in healthcare revenue cycle operations lack the visibility of denied claims because they don't trigger alerts or queue workflows. Without dedicated ownership and line-level verification against contract terms, paid claims that fall short of their contractual amount pass through undetected.

  • 01Denial workflows activate on rejection events, but underpayments produce no event, leaving paid claims unverified by default.
  • 02The speaker says many provider groups lack line-level contract intelligence to check each paid line against the applicable terms.
  • 03Payment received and payment checked are separate tasks: one verifies acceptance, the other verifies correctness—and the second often has no assigned owner.

Nov 6, 2026

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero payment on a claim line isn't automatically an underpayment; contract terms, particularly packaging rules, determine whether zero is correct. Chasing unsupported findings damages credibility with payers and weakens the position of legitimate disputes, so revenue cycle teams must verify the full contract terms and effective dates before treating any payment difference as a finding.

  • 01When a contract packages add-ons into the primary procedure, the add-on line may legitimately show zero payment because it is folded into the primary procedure reimbursement.
  • 02Pursuing payment differences that lack contract support burns credibility with payers and can weaken the team’s position on later disputes, including valid ones.
  • 03Always verify the complete contract terms, fee schedules, carve-outs, amendments, and the specific version in effect on the date of service before treating a payment variance as a recoverable underpayment.

Nov 6, 2026

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

Practices can receive payment on closed, clean claims that still fall short of negotiated contract amounts because billing ends at coding, submission and posting, while no role owns checking whether payer payments match fee schedules. The speaker argues that contract-level payment review is a separate, complementary function that compares closed claims to contract terms and, run continuously, helps surface shortfalls in time to act within timely filing windows.

  • 01Correctly coded and billed healthcare claims can still result in underpayment.
  • 02Practices should review closed-claim payments against contract terms to spot underpayments.
  • 03Discrepancies in claim payments can persist despite adherence to billing protocols.

Nov 6, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512