Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will soon publish a list of Birthing-Friendly Hospitals

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will soon publish a list of Birthing-Friendly Hospitals. Many insurance providers have pledged to share this information with policyholders. Melanie Musson, an insurance expert with USInsuranceAgents.com, says, “Insurance companies should reevaluate their coverage of birthing supports to improve outcomes and save money.” According to the U.S….

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will soon publish a list of Birthing-Friendly Hospitals. Many insurance providers have pledged to share this information with policyholders. Melanie Musson, an insurance expert with USInsuranceAgents.com, says, “Insurance companies should reevaluate their coverage of birthing supports to improve outcomes and save money.”

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that they will be publishing a list of Birthing Friendly Hospitals in the fall of 2023.

This designation is part of a greater initiative to address maternal morbidity as well as equity in care and treatment for birthing mothers and babies. Maternal mortality is one area that the U.S. health care system that falls short compared to other healthcare systems around the world.

Insurance Provider Response

Immediately following CMS’s report, over 25 health insurance providers announced that they would include the birth-friendly hospital designation in their care providers lists.

Including a designation in a list may not seem like a big step, but it proves that insurance providers are paying attention to this information and they’re showing their support. If CMS is putting an emphasis on maternal health, insurance providers need to recognize the importance.

Before parents can worry about life insurance for their babies, they should have a safe and healthy birthing experience.

Insurance Provider Planning

Insurance providers have a lot of freedom when developing their policies and choosing what to cover. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) demands some types of coverage, but a lot is left to the discretion of the insurance company.

CMS will likely also be promoting programs that would provide 12 months of post-partum follow-up care. And insurance providers should respond to this by analyzing the benefit of extended postpartum care.

Preventative care tends to cost less than responsive care. So, if extended postpartum health care improves maternal and infant health, insurance providers could improve their bottom line by offering similar coverage to that proposed by Medicaid.

Another component being studied and proposed to be included in future CMS updates is birth doula coverage. Most health insurance plans do not cover the cost to have a birth doula, but CMS has indicated that doula assistance is associated with better outcomes for both mothers and babies.

Insurance providers should also consider the merit of doulas and analyze the cost of covering doula services with the savings associated with doula-assisted births.

Insurance providers must continually research how coverage can improve outcomes and lower costs, and CMS’s announcement should spur them to review coverage surrounding birth.

Article by Melanie Musson

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Healthcare AI should give doctors attention back, not shorter visits

Healthcare AI should give doctors attention back, not shorter visits

Healthcare organizations should deploy AI to give clinicians back attention and capacity for better decisions, not simply shorten visits. Landry argues AI should fit into existing workflows with insights appearing at the right time, and that organizations should set clear governance and automation boundaries before deployment and measure what changes for patients, clinicians and the organization.

  • 01AI success in healthcare should expand clinician capacity for thoughtful care, not optimize for visit speed; a three-minute appointment is not patient-centered innovation.
  • 02Design AI into workflows clinicians already use with insights appearing at the right moment, making adoption a workflow problem rather than a training problem.
  • 03Set automation boundaries before deploying AI, specifying what it may do alone, what it recommends for clinician decision-making, and what requires explicit human control and accountability.

Nov 11, 2026

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

U.S. health plan administrative costs rose 2.7% to about $69.2 billion in the first half of 2026, even as margins improved to 4.1%. Black Book Research's 2027 outlook says AI is starting to move payer sourcing in both directions. Demand for specialist vendors stays strong in some functions, while automation could make in-house or hybrid models viable in others. The report recommends comparing each major outsourced service with rival vendors and the best internal or hybrid option, and checking whether projected savings become actual cash.

  • 01Every major outsourced payer service should be benchmarked against a rival vendor and against the plan's best feasible internal or hybrid model, a three-way contest at each renewal.
  • 02Avoided vacancies, projected productivity gains and payment recoveries are not recurring cash, so outsourcing savings should not be assumed to fund AI until the service, AI and funding cases each stand on their own.
  • 03Provider data sits on both sides of the sourcing question: it is a top pain point and a specialist-demand area, yet also one of the functions where automation could make hybrid or in-house models viable.

Nov 11, 2026

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham Health and Alleghany Health marked one year with Advocate Health as a surgical technology program drew 65 applicants for 12 seats. An anniversary release lists $11.3 million in pay and rewards and a $19.3 million capital figure, and says nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services through Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. Local training seats look like the next limit in Elkin.

  • 01In rural North Carolina, a new surgical technology program drew more than five applicants per seat, which points to training capacity, not interest, as the thing to expand.
  • 02Pay and rewards totaled $11.3 million in year one, versus a $19.3 million capital figure—about 58% as large, by MarketScale’s arithmetic.
  • 03Nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services versus just over 70 virtual consultations and encounters (about 14:1 by MarketScale’s arithmetic), with expanded virtual care planned for year two.

Nov 10, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512