Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesIndustrial IoT

The Need to Protect Critical Infrastructure with Cybersecurity for IoT and OT

With the growing threat of cyberattacks on critical U.S. infrastructure, is the government prepared? A December 1, 2022, report released by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) called for immediate action on cybersecurity for IoT and OT-connected devices to provide better security for critical infrastructure vulnerable to today’s sophisticated cyber threats. The report indicates 16…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Industrial IoT teams put it to work with AI Visibility (GEO).

By James Kent · CybersecurityCybersecurity for Iot and OtInternet of ThingsIot
Share

Key takeaways

01

With the growing threat of cyberattacks on critical U.S.

02

infrastructure, is the government prepared?

03

A December 1, 2022, report released by the U.S.

With the growing threat of cyberattacks on critical U.S. infrastructure, is the government prepared?

A December 1, 2022, report released by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) called for immediate action on cybersecurity for IoT and OT-connected devices to provide better security for critical infrastructure vulnerable to today’s sophisticated cyber threats.

The report indicates 16 critical infrastructure areas reliant on internet-connected devices and systems, providing essential services from electricity to health care. All sectors fall under the GAO report’s high-risk category.

A primary concern for the GAO is that more action is needed to provide the level of cybersecurity required to secure these critical U.S. departments. The GAO has provided more than 90 cybersecurity recommendations since 2010, with more than 50 unimplemented as of June 2022.

Mike Sheward, Head of Security for Particle, believes the U.S. government needs to get serious about cybersecurity for IoT and OT.

Mike’s Thoughts

“On the government accountability officers report on IOT and OT security. So, there are a couple of things that jump out to me. The first is that there are no shortage of different agencies within the federal government making recommendations about cybersecurity for these kinds of devices and having lots of different recommendations from lots of different places about lots of different types of devices is a very good way to kind of get into a state of analysis paralysis and not apply anything cause you’re worried about which standard you should be applying.

So, I would like to see more of a focus on the ecosystem that those devices are connected to. Maybe kind of sorting them out by classification so we can focus on securing that platform or that environment more than each device on a device-by-device basis. That would be probably more effective. The second thing is that a lot of the previous recommendations made in the report have not been implemented yet. That’s because, in my opinion, the government is probably still in the discovery stage for a lot of this stuff. The larger the organization, the harder it is to apply any kind of cybersecurity program.

Just because you don’t know what’s out there, you lose track of it. You can’t protect what you don’t know about. It’s hard to think of many organizations that are bigger than the federal government. So, I imagine that they are, working on doing the discovery, and so I need to focus on speeding that up so that you could probably do a lot of kind of disabling of things that no longer need to be in the environment, and then focusing on the things that are left for the new security standards.

About the author

JK
James KentPodcast Host and Content Creator

Dependable leader and Podcaster with more than 12 years of results-oriented brand marketing and agency management experience including a broad range of competencies: Adaptive communication and presentation skills. A manager who coaches, mentors and leads. Ability to successfully work cross-functionally within every level of an organization. Strong focus on innovative marketing solutions. Outstanding client relationship building and strategic account management support. Thrives in fast-paced environments with multiple deliverables. Podcast host and content creator.

Industrial IoT: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Industrial IoT buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Industrial IoT Insights

Behind every robot: why component supply chains are the real bottleneck in robotics scale-up

Behind every robot: why component supply chains are the real bottleneck in robotics scale-up

Automate 2026 revealed that robotics adoption is more hindered by supply chain issues than by AI and software limitations. The event underscored the importance of component availability in scaling up robotics. Without addressing these supply chain bottlenecks, the growth of robotics in the industrial sector may be stymied.

  • 01Component supply chains are the main bottleneck in robotics scaling.
  • 02AI and software are not significant limitations in robotics adoption.
  • 03Availability of components is critical for the growth of industrial robotics.

Jul 10, 2026

Industrial automation's AI gap: why 80% of U.S. factories still run without robots

Industrial automation's AI gap: why 80% of U.S. factories still run without robots

Despite advances in AI, 80% of U.S. factories still operate without any automation. Companies like Honeywell and ABB are advocating for AI-driven tools to help close this automation gap. The industrial sector faces challenges in implementing this technology across existing manufacturing facilities.

  • 0180% of U.S. factories don't use automation.
  • 02AI-driven tools are promoted by companies like Honeywell and ABB.
  • 03Industrial sector challenges hinder widespread AI implementation.

Jul 10, 2026

Physical AI, no-code cobots, and inbound logistics automation headline the latest wave of industrial robotics news

Physical AI, no-code cobots, and inbound logistics automation headline the latest wave of industrial robotics news

The article discusses recent advancements in industrial robotics, including a $2.8 billion funding round for physical AI, developments in no-code cobots, and automation in inbound logistics. These advancements are rapidly impacting the industrial sector, offering new tools and efficiencies for enterprise operators. Key areas of development include explosion-proof robotics and user-friendly programming interfaces.

  • 01$2.8B funding round for physical AI highlights increasing investment in industrial robotics.
  • 02No-code cobots are becoming more prevalent, focusing on ease of use and deployability in industrial settings.
  • 03Automation in inbound logistics is gaining traction, promising efficiency improvements.

Jul 9, 2026

Explore More Industrial IoT Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Industrial IoT.

Browse Industrial IoT Hub

About the Expert

JK
James Kent

Podcast Host and Content Creator

Dependable leader and Podcaster with more than 12 years of results-oriented brand marketing and agency management experience including a broad range of competencies: Adaptive communication and presentation skills. A manager who coaches, mentors and leads. Ability to successfully work cross-functionally within every level of an organization. Strong focus on innovative marketing solutions. Outstanding client relationship building and strategic account management support. Thrives in fast-paced environments with multiple deliverables. Podcast host and content creator.