Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

The Differences Between Calendered and Extruded Vinyl Films

There are two main ways to produce vinyl films: calendering and extrusion. Each of these industrial processes can be used to produce a range of film and sheet products with distinct qualities. As with any manufacturing process, there are advantages and disadvantages to each approach. What is Calendering? In calendering, raw materials enter a mixing…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Share
The Differences Between Calendered and Extruded Vinyl Films

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Engineering & Construction?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Engineering & Construction coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

There are two main ways to produce vinyl films: calendering and extrusion. Each of these industrial processes can be used to produce a range of film and sheet products with distinct qualities. As with any manufacturing process, there are advantages and disadvantages to each approach.

What is Calendering?

In calendering, raw materials enter a mixing chamber where they are melted. This molten plastic then moves through a series of heated rollers that compress the material to the desired thickness. Finally, it passes through a series of surface conditioning and cooling rolls, then is wound into custom rolls or cut into sheets.

Calendering Pros and Cons

On the plus side, calendering allows high run rates on films 6 to 60 mils thick. Calendered material typically has higher tensile properties, product uniformity, and unusually close gauge control when compared with extruded films. The added mixing in the process is ideal for highly filled applications and materials, and has the additional advantage that melt degassing occurs in the process. Finally, materials with lower melt temperatures can be used in calendering due to the high pressures used between rollers.

On the downside, calendered products may have issues with pinholes at gauges less than 6 mils, and there may be appearance issues. The rollers used may create surface blemishes and edge buildup on the melt path can create black specs. Also, the sheets are usually less glossy than extruded materials. Calendering is a process that is typically not economically profitable for short production runs.

What is Extrusion?

In extrusion, mixed plastic compound is conveyed through a heated barrel using a spiral shaped screw, converting it into molten plastic. A lip die flattens the mass into a sheet of the desired width and thickness, which then passes through heated embossing rolls that impart a surface finish. The sheet is then trimmed to its final dimension.

Extrusion Pros and Cons

Extrusion offers a number of advantages. Even at thinner gauges, extruded film is pinhole free and has improved “lay flat” qualities. The extrusion process is more flexible, allowing faster changeovers for smaller production runs. The process also delivers better dimensional stability in both machine and cross web directions, and screws can be designed for specific formulations to help improve film characteristics. Finally, the streamlined melt flow reduces black specks.

A disadvantage of extrusion is the requirement for higher melt temperatures. There can also be poor mixing on highly filled formulations. Finally, melt degassing can be a production issue.

Presco Uses Extrusion to Produce Its Presco Engineered Film

Presco compounds and extrudes the flexible vinyl film known as Presco Engineered Film, which is custom formulated to the exact specification of our customers. And in 2017, Presco added Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) film extrusion to its capabilities as an option for PVC-free manufacturing. To learn about our capabilities, click here.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Engineering & Construction starts with a company putting its project engineers, superintendents, and estimators on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Owners shortlist firms they already trust, and your field leaders become the reason your name is on that list.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Engineering & Construction Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your project engineers, superintendents, and estimators into the articles, video, and social content Engineering & Construction buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Engineering & Construction Insights

Packaging robots are now cheaper than labor over the long run, PMMI says

Packaging robots are now cheaper than labor over the long run, PMMI says

PMMI's Tom Egan wrote in Processing Magazine that adding packaging automation and robotics can now be justified as more cost-effective over the long term than the high cost of labor in food, beverage and CPG plants. Separately, Packaging World describes AI-enabled AMRs from ABB and Agilox that automate material movement between packaging stations. The remaining gap is adoption among smaller manufacturers.

  • 01Two reference points for infrastructure-light material movement: ABB's Flexley Mover P603 carries 1,500 kg with sub-centimeter positioning and no floor markers, and Agilox's OFL lifts 800 kg pallets on peer-to-peer fleet software with no central traffic controller, per Packaging World.
  • 02The open ground is small and mid-sized manufacturers: MTC's Mike Wilson counts tens of thousands of UK SMEs with no robotic automation at all and expects cobots to take most of that growth.
  • 03A robotics business case should include procurement, not only line labor: a June 2026 China Journal of Accounting Research study found heavy robot adopters spread buying across more suppliers, gaining resilience but losing inventory efficiency and adding transaction costs.

Sep 18, 2026

Xtellio brings telematics to jobsite tools and heaters

Xtellio brings telematics to jobsite tools and heaters

Xtellio launched a two-tier telematics platform in March 2026: 32 battery-powered Xense sensors for small tools and wired Pro-Xentral devices for excavators, light towers and heaters. The company claims a 10-year battery life. Data is delivered through open APIs, which Xtellio frames as customer ownership of the data, aimed at rental and construction fleets where small assets have gone largely untracked.

  • 01A 10-year battery claim on a bolt-on Bluetooth sensor is the benchmark to hold any small-asset telematics vendor against; it decides whether tagging hundreds of tools is a one-time job or a recurring maintenance chore.
  • 02For rental houses and contractors running mixed fleets, the sharper question is no longer which machines have telematics but whether the heaters, light towers and hand tools do, and whether that data lands in the same system.
  • 03Open APIs and customer-owned data are now part of the pitch from a telematics hardware maker, which gives buyers a concrete contract clause to ask for: where can the data be sent, and who controls it once the asset is on rent.

Sep 18, 2026

Senate bill would double smart water grants to $50 million a year

Senate bill would double smart water grants to $50 million a year

S. 2388, the Water Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2025, would double an EPA water tech pilot to $50 million a year through 2028. Grants would cover design, construction, training and operations for leak detection, advanced metering and AI analytics, WaterWorld reported. Planning and maintenance stay on the utility's tab.

  • 01Under S. 2388 as WaterWorld describes it, feasibility studies are not grant-eligible, so a utility would have to pay to build the case for a smart water project before applying for help building the project itself.
  • 02The bill's eligible list puts advanced digital design and construction management tools in the same bucket as meters and sensors, which would give a utility's capital delivery team a claim on the same grant as its field operations group.
  • 03The existing pilot program's authorization runs through 2026, per WaterWorld; the bill would extend it to 2028, and its last reported status was 'introduced' as of Aug. 12, 2025.

Sep 17, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512