Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

The Differences Between Calendered and Extruded Vinyl Films

There are two main ways to produce vinyl films: calendering and extrusion. Each of these industrial processes can be used to produce a range of film and sheet products with distinct qualities. As with any manufacturing process, there are advantages and disadvantages to each approach. What is Calendering? In calendering, raw materials enter a mixing…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Share
The Differences Between Calendered and Extruded Vinyl Films

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Engineering & Construction?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Engineering & Construction coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

There are two main ways to produce vinyl films: calendering and extrusion. Each of these industrial processes can be used to produce a range of film and sheet products with distinct qualities. As with any manufacturing process, there are advantages and disadvantages to each approach.

What is Calendering?

In calendering, raw materials enter a mixing chamber where they are melted. This molten plastic then moves through a series of heated rollers that compress the material to the desired thickness. Finally, it passes through a series of surface conditioning and cooling rolls, then is wound into custom rolls or cut into sheets.

Calendering Pros and Cons

On the plus side, calendering allows high run rates on films 6 to 60 mils thick. Calendered material typically has higher tensile properties, product uniformity, and unusually close gauge control when compared with extruded films. The added mixing in the process is ideal for highly filled applications and materials, and has the additional advantage that melt degassing occurs in the process. Finally, materials with lower melt temperatures can be used in calendering due to the high pressures used between rollers.

On the downside, calendered products may have issues with pinholes at gauges less than 6 mils, and there may be appearance issues. The rollers used may create surface blemishes and edge buildup on the melt path can create black specs. Also, the sheets are usually less glossy than extruded materials. Calendering is a process that is typically not economically profitable for short production runs.

What is Extrusion?

In extrusion, mixed plastic compound is conveyed through a heated barrel using a spiral shaped screw, converting it into molten plastic. A lip die flattens the mass into a sheet of the desired width and thickness, which then passes through heated embossing rolls that impart a surface finish. The sheet is then trimmed to its final dimension.

Extrusion Pros and Cons

Extrusion offers a number of advantages. Even at thinner gauges, extruded film is pinhole free and has improved “lay flat” qualities. The extrusion process is more flexible, allowing faster changeovers for smaller production runs. The process also delivers better dimensional stability in both machine and cross web directions, and screws can be designed for specific formulations to help improve film characteristics. Finally, the streamlined melt flow reduces black specks.

A disadvantage of extrusion is the requirement for higher melt temperatures. There can also be poor mixing on highly filled formulations. Finally, melt degassing can be a production issue.

Presco Uses Extrusion to Produce Its Presco Engineered Film

Presco compounds and extrudes the flexible vinyl film known as Presco Engineered Film, which is custom formulated to the exact specification of our customers. And in 2017, Presco added Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) film extrusion to its capabilities as an option for PVC-free manufacturing. To learn about our capabilities, click here.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Engineering & Construction starts with a company putting its project engineers, superintendents, and estimators on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Owners shortlist firms they already trust, and your field leaders become the reason your name is on that list.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Engineering & Construction Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your project engineers, superintendents, and estimators into the articles, video, and social content Engineering & Construction buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Engineering & Construction Insights

FAB 40 highlights top U.S. metal fabricators, including acquisitive Cadrex

The Fabricator’s 2023 FAB 40 ranks U.S. metal fabricators by reported revenue. PR Newswire reported Cadrex Manufacturing Solutions debuted at No. 2 with $480 million in 2022 revenue after a series of acquisitions, while MEC again held No. 1 with $539.4 million.

  • 01PR Newswire reported Cadrex Manufacturing Solutions entered The Fabricator’s 2023 FAB 40 at No. 2 after a series of acquisitions.
  • 02MEC’s long-running No. 1 position, with $539.4 million in reported 2022 revenue, reinforces what scale and repeatable process look like at the top of the list, according to PR Newswire.
  • 03PR Newswire flagged both material price inflation and demand as drivers of record revenues, buyers should press suppliers on what portion of growth was pricing versus volume.

Sep 6, 2026

HUD backs a 24-month study on mass-timber modules that ship and stack faster

HUD backs a 24-month study on mass-timber modules that ship and stack faster

HUD funded a 24-month Washington State University project on hybrid mass-timber modular housing. It targets transportability and faster site assembly. A 2023 Journal of Building Engineering review says 2D modular CLT tends to ship farther and build faster than 3D.

  • 01If transportation is the cost driver, HUD’s study plan points straight at the spec: treat the truck interface, tie-downs, and lifting points as part of the structural module design, not afterthought hardware.
  • 02The most actionable design fork in the CLT modular literature is 2D versus 3D: according to a 2023 Journal of Building Engineering review, 2D modules are typically moved longer distances and assembled faster on average.
  • 03Owners who want future change-of-use optionality can start writing it into module grids and connection details now. HUD-backed research is explicitly testing modules that can be repurposed across occupancies over their lifetime.

Sep 6, 2026

HUD’s 24-month mass timber modular project goes after the cost driver: shipping the modules

HUD’s 24-month mass timber modular project goes after the cost driver: shipping the modules

HUD is funding a 24-month Washington State University project to redesign modular housing modules around transport and fast site assembly. Shipping is the design constraint. A 2023 Journal of Building Engineering review of 2009–2021 modular CLT projects suggests faster construction timelines, but logistics choices still decide feasibility.

  • 01In modular housing, transportation is becoming a first-order engineering spec, the module that is cheapest to build can still be the most expensive to move.
  • 02The 2023 review found 2D modular CLT projects were, on average, transported farther and built faster than 3D ones, so configuration choice shapes both transport reach and install time.

Sep 5, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512