What Impact Does Inventory Accuracy Have on Retail Sales and Loss?

The accuracy of inventory can quickly degrade when it comes to retailers, particularly those with many stores. That makes inventory accuracy critical, especially considering that companies have invested heavily in omnichannel methods and adapted their strategies to meet consumer demand.

On this episode of Keeping Count, a podcast from the inventory experts at Datascan, host Tyler Kern talked with Adrian Thomas, President and CEO of Datascan. This episode is unique, as it’s a companion piece to a live roundtable discussion that featured three experts – Adrian Beck, Emeritus Professor, University of Leicester, Thomas, and David Erasmus, Datascan’s Director for the EMEA region.

Retailers can see inventory accuracy degrade by as much as 3% per month once a count has been completed, according to statistics from Datascan based on robust research. This is a large number and something that should be of concern to retailers.

Further, the average inventory accuracy amongst retailers is staggeringly low at 60-65%, according to Thomas. But, with tighter inventory comes the reduction of loss and even better sales.

“Higher levels of inventory accuracy can actually drive sales,” Thomas said. “The closer you can get your inventory accuracy in a store to your book accuracy and book inventory – you will drive between 4-8% sales uplift.”

Two things come from the improved inventory accuracy. One is that you’re improving your delivery channels to your clients and consumers. The second is that you’re improving your accuracy and inventory efficiency around the supply chain utilized around your distribution

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale
Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale
LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Image

Latest

care
Navigating the Denial Pipeline: How Medicare Advantage Plans Reshape Access to Care
December 2, 2025

Medicare Advantage was sold as a smarter, more efficient way to care for seniors, but too often the efficiency seems to land on the wrong side of the patient–provider relationship. When plans deny or delay needed services through opaque rules and weak oversight, beneficiaries feel it first—in missed therapies, postponed procedures, and a…

Read More
Texas
Up Next: Demographic Change, Education, and the Future of Texas and the Nation
December 2, 2025

Houston’s unmatched diversity and rapidly growing young population are reshaping the city’s economic future — and offering clues about what’s ahead for the nation. In the upcoming episode of Weaver: Beyond the Numbers, the conversation explores how immigration, education, and demographic momentum intersect to create extraordinary opportunities when supported with the right investments.

Read More
patient
Rebecca Interview: When Peer-to-Peer Reviews Stop Being About the Patient
December 2, 2025

Behind the sterile labels of “inpatient” versus “observation” care is a messy reality: clinicians and insurers often enter peer-to-peer reviews without a shared rulebook, turning what should be a clinical dialogue into a box-checking exercise. The speaker’s frustration points to a broader problem in U.S. healthcare utilization management—decisions about coverage can feel pre-decided,…

Read More
physician advisor
Navigating Payer Denials: A Physician Advisor’s Perspective #2
December 2, 2025

A physician advisor recently described a case that should unsettle anyone who cares about fair, clinically grounded coverage decisions: a Medicaid patient arrived comatose from an overdose, was emergently intubated, developed aspiration pneumonia, and stayed through three midnights before leaving against medical advice. By any bedside standard, this is acute, unstable care—exactly what…

Read More