Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesSciences

How Are AI Pros Weighing ChatGPT’s Role in the World of Science?

New evolving and fast-developing AIs have started rising to fame in recent years, and with the recent invention of ChatGPT – an AI chatbot launched in late 2022 which gained over 100 million users within the first two months of launching – people from all around the world are starting to question the role of AI technology…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Sciences teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By carey.scott · · AiChat GptDeveloping AiScience
Share

Key takeaways

01

New evolving and fast-developing AIs have started rising to fame in recent years, and with the recent invention of ChatGPT – an AI chatbot launched in late 2022 which gained over 100 million users within the first two months of launching – people from all around the world are starting to question the role of AI technology…

Free workspace

Turn your Sciences expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

New evolving and fast-developing AIs have started rising to fame in recent years, and with the recent invention of ChatGPT – an AI chatbot launched in late 2022 which gained over 100 million users within the first two months of launching – people from all around the world are starting to question the role of AI technology in their daily lives. Among these uncertainties is ChatGPT’s role in the world of science.

Will there be a huge impact of ChatGPT and developing AI in science? How will Chat GPT and developing AI contribute to modern science?

Biologists like Casey Greene and Milton Pividori see the tool as incredibly useful. After running their own research of using the tool for improving the quality and readability of academic manuscripts, Pividori concluded that ChatGPT, alongside other AI tools, is adding value to their lives by making helping scientists be “more productive as researchers.”

Meanwhile, other scientists are saying that they now regularly use LLMs (large language models like ChatGPT) not only to edit manuscripts but also to help them write or check code and to brainstorm ideas. As Nature.com reports, scientists like Almira Osmanovic Thunström, a neurobiologist at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, says the use of ChatGPT will keep scientists from needing to “sit and write long introductions for grant applications.”

That being said, many scientists and researchers have pointed out a few disadvantages of AI tools. These are in the form of inaccurate information and fictitious citations presented by AI machines, giving scientists a reason to rely less on AI and more on their own manual research and cross-referencing. Can researchers confidently pinpoint ChatGPT’s role in the world of science?

Ganesh Gopalan, CEO and co-founder of Gnani.ai, a conversational AI platform with a focus on customer experience enhancement, weighs in on the impact of ChatGPT and other developing AI tools in the world of science and the difference it can make in research fields.

Ganesh Gopalan’s Thoughts

“ChatGPT is going to help researchers automate all their routine activities such as writing publications, reviewing documents are automatically creating extracts.

These articles typically warn of the pitfalls in terms of biases that ChatGPT could throw up and the possible inaccuracies. So, what I thought the best thing to evaluate this is to ask ChatGPT the same question. When I ask ChatGPT the same questions, I got a lot more results such as the influence on drug discovery, the influence on analyzing large pieces of scientific data and finding the relationships.

So essentially, I guess ChatGPT has a lot of benefits for science but you’ve gotta be a little careful on the biases and also on the accuracy of the data.”

Article written by Azam Saghir.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Sciences starts with a company putting its lab directors, applications scientists, and field specialists on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Lab and research buyers verify before they trial, and your scientists give them something credible to verify against.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

C
carey.scott
B2B Weekly

The week in Sciences, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Sciences: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Sciences buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Sciences expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your lab directors, applications scientists, and field specialists into the articles, video, and social content Sciences buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Sciences Insights

Why shared auto-injectors keep forcing rebuilt device files

Why shared auto-injectors keep forcing rebuilt device files

Vertex Knight co-founder Fubin Wu cites digitalization, personalization and large-volume delivery as trends reshaping drug delivery devices, arguing structured data can enable reuse and cut duplicated design-file work for shared auto-injectors. ISPE says no regulatory pathway exists for platform devices, and ONdrugDelivery counts 182 large-volume subcutaneous biologics, about 15% of IV and SC agents.

  • 01A device shared across drug products still triggers repeated design control work for each new combination product, and ISPE's November 2025 article says no regulatory pathway yet exists to approve a platform device.
  • 02FDA's May 2024 draft platform technology designation under section 506K is written for drug product applications, so device design files sit outside it.
  • 03Large-volume subcutaneous biologics above 2 mL numbered 182 in a January 2025 ONdrugDelivery review, about 15% of IV and SC agents; Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews reported in July 2026 that volumes up to 25 mL are now pursued.

Oct 22, 2026

Hepalink's FOYA-winning syringe plant inspects 24,000 units an hour

Hepalink's FOYA-winning syringe plant inspects 24,000 units an hour

Hepalink's Pingshan prefilled syringe plant in Shenzhen won the Innovation (Novel Technology) category at ISPE's 2026 Facility of the Year Awards. In the transcript ISPE posted with its podcast, CaiXue Wei describes vertical design, AGV-assisted transfer, AI inspection and 5G-MEC as one integrated system built around a 330 million-syringe annual capacity; Hepalink's own release adds a 24-meter warehouse, sub-10 millisecond 5G and 24,000-unit-an-hour inspection.

  • 01Hepalink's 24-meter automated warehouse raised space utilization 52 percent over a traditional layout on a land-scarce Shenzhen site supporting 330 million syringes a year.
  • 02AGVs pass material through vaporized hydrogen peroxide chambers straight into Grade A isolators, and Hepalink credits the zero-touch flow for a 100 percent first media fill.

Oct 22, 2026

Chalmers' AI scientist turned 60,000 yeast records into nearly 2,000 testable ideas

Chalmers' AI scientist turned 60,000 yeast records into nearly 2,000 testable ideas

Chalmers University of Technology's AI scientist Eve analyzed about 60,000 public yeast records, came up with almost 2,000 testable ideas, and took full charge of planning the experiments and telling other robots what to do, according to CORDIS. Humans handled safety checks and plate moving.

  • 01The key step for company labs is translation: turning hypotheses into machine-executable protocols and getting contextualized results back to the reasoning layer fast.

Oct 19, 2026

Explore More Sciences Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Sciences.

Browse Sciences Hub

About the Expert

C
carey.scott

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Sciences and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512