Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

As Organizations Ask If They “Should” Launch AI Projects, A Risk Management System Becomes Essential

Four leading US AI companies — Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI — have formed the Frontier Model Forum to collaboratively address advanced AI risks and establish industry safety standards. The initiative includes commitments to risk management tools such as watermarking to distinguish AI-generated content from human-produced content. As organizations evaluate whether to launch AI projects, a structured AI risk management framework is becoming essential.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Mark Beccue · Ai EthicsAi IntegrationData PrivacyData Transparency
Share

Key takeaways

01

Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI launched the Frontier Model Forum to set safety and security standards for advanced AI.

02

Member companies are committing to risk management tools like watermarking to label AI-generated content.

03

Organizations considering AI projects increasingly need formal risk management systems to govern deployment responsibly.

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Software & Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Software & Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

Four major US AI firms, including Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, and ChatGPT’s creator OpenAI, have launched the Frontier Model Forum to address advanced AI risks and establish industry standards. This collaborative initiative emphasizes safety, security, and trust, with companies committing to risk management system tools like watermarking systems to differentiate AI-generated from human-produced content.

Companies know AI is not merely about integrating the latest algorithms or using vast data sets. At its core, it’s about making critical decisions that affect stakeholders, users, and the general public. That’s why, as AI weaves its way deeper into our daily operations, the real question companies should grapple with isn’t, “Can I implement this AI?”, but rather, “Should I?”

As such, before diving headfirst into AI development, organizations need to assess the ethical dimensions, from bias and accuracy to transparency and data privacy. That’s where a risk management system comes into play. Expert Mark Beccue, Research Director of AI at The Futurum Group, weighs in with further analysis on just how a risk management system can help a business set ethical standards for their AI practices.

Mark’s Thoughts:

“An organization shouldn’t be asking, ‘Can I do this AI?’ It really should be asking, rather, ‘Should I do this AI?’ And you look at that through the lens of: Does it make sense for our organization? What risks are we going to take?

Hi. I’m Mark Beccue. I’m the Research Director of AI at the Futurum Group.

Thinking about this question, it is interesting that some of the leaders in the hyperscalers space have come forward to volunteer some best practices. And I think the first thing we have to think about when you talk about recommendations is that any organization that’s looking at AI or working on AI right now should build their own AI risk management structure for their organization. And what I mean by that is you’re going to look for governance tools, AI governance tools. It starts with risk management, risk assessments. But it really should include an oversight team and really life cycle management.

It’s really kind of soup to nuts how you do AI really comes down to working on understanding the risks for your company. And, you know, that’s really aside from things that are happening with standards and stuff like that. Because there’s lots of risks involved and you need to understand them.

When you look at AI risk management, and another best practice is to think about the core areas of focus, which really evolve around, AI ethics. And those are accuracy, which has to do with bias, transparency of AI, security, which also includes data privacy, and then fairness. So those are the core pieces that are in an AI risk management structure.

And there’s really another piece that you have to think about when you’re looking at AI going forward and how you’re going to look at standards, what best practices are. And it really comes down to a very simple question. An organization shouldn’t be asking, ‘Can I do this AI?’ It really should be asking, rather, ‘Should I do this AI?’ And you look at that through the lens of: Does it make sense for our organization? What risks are we going to take?

So, if you take that approach, the standards are going to come. It’s super early. There’s not a lot out there right yet that are very specific to AI. They will come. The laws and the standards will come.

There are some protections for organizations to kind of think about this a little more within GDPR. So that’s data privacy, which will cover a lot of AI things. And then there’s maybe some security issues. Not so much in standards, but what organizations do to vet technology or applications they use and think about that from their own perspective of what they face with security.

Last thing I’ll leave is there’s a really good resource for any organization that’s looking into this step, and that is it’s called aiethicist.org. And that has lots of frameworks, lots of resources from multiple organizations that are free that you can look at to start to think about how you’re going to set up your organization.”

Article written by Cara Schildmeyer.

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

An organization should be asking. It shouldn't be asking, can I do this AI? It really should be asking rather, should I do this and you look at that through the lens of does it make sense for our organization? What risks are we going to take? Hi. I'm Mark Becky. I'm a research director for AI at the futurum group. Thinking about this question. It is interesting that some of the leaders in the hyperscalers space have come forward to volunteer some best practices. And I think the first thing we have to think about when you talk about recommendations is that any organization that's looking at AI are working on AI right now should build their own AI risk management structure for their organization. And what I mean by that is you're you're gonna look for governance tools, AI governance tools. It starts with risk management, risk assessment, But it really should include an oversight team and really life cycle management. It's really kind of soup the nuts how you do AI really comes down to working on understanding the risks for your company. And, you know, that's really aside from things that are happening with, standards and stuff like that. Because there's lots of risk involved and you need to understand them. When you look at AI risk management and another best practice is to think about the core areas of focus, which really evolve around, AI ethics. And those are accuracy, which has to do with bias transparency of AI security, which also includes data privacy, and then fairness. So those are the core pieces that are in an AI risk management, structure. And there's really another piece that you have to think about when you're looking at AI going forward and how you're gonna look at standards, what best practices are. And it really comes down to a very simple question. An organization should be asking it shouldn't be asking, can I do this AI? It really should be asking rather, should I do this AI? And you look at that through the lens of does it make sense for our organization? What risks are we going to take? So if you take that approach the standards standards are gonna come. It's super early. There's not a lot out there right yet that are very specific to AI. They will calm the laws and the standards will come. There are some protections for organizations to kind of think about this a little more with with within GDPR. So that's day privacy, which will cover a lot of AI things. And then there's maybe some security issues, not not so much in standards, but what organizations do to vet technology or applications they use and think about that from their own perspective of what they face with, with security. Last thing I'll leave is there's a really good resource for any organization that's looking into this step, and that is it's called ai ethicist dot org. And that has lots of frameworks, lots resources from multiple organizations for, that are free that you can look at to start to think about how you're gonna set up your organization.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Software & Technology starts with a company putting its solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Buyers ask AI engines who to consider, and published expert answers are what those engines cite.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

Mark Beccue
Mark BeccueResearch Director

Mark Beccue is a veteran market research analyst with more than 25 years of experience in market research and business strategy. Mark is one of a handful of pioneering analysts who began to focus on AI market research in 2015. Today with Futurum Group and previously as a principal analyst within the AI practice area at Omdia and Tractica, he has advised clients and provided them with syndicated and custom qualitative AI research services. His expertise in AI use cases, applications and software, natural language AI and broader trends surrounding AI market adoption have made him a well-known and sought after speaker, panel moderator, conference chair and media resource within the AI business community. He has served in those roles for events including the AI Summits in London, Singapore, New York and Silicon Valley, IOT World, Smart Home Summit, UX Next and Telco AI Europe. Prior to joining Tractica, Mark was an independent market research analyst focused on emerging technologies. Before going independent, Mark served as in house market intelligence analyst for Syniverse, where he helped guide overall business and product line strategies. For 4 years Mark worked as a Senior Analyst for ABI Research, a global technology research firm, focusing on mobile consumer services. Prior to ABI, Mark worked for 10 years for Syniverse in product management, greenhouse innovation and marketing. Specialties: AI B2B and B2C market intelligence, analysis and insights. Natural Language AI. Operationalizing AI in the Enterprise. AI market adoption trends and issues. Strengths - AI and other technical market analysis designed for business readers, writing, thought leadership, forecasting, market sizing

Follow Software & Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Software & Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers into the articles, video, and social content Software & Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Software & Technology Insights

Nvidia Says It Will Double Chip Sales Next Year. The Supply Chain Is Where That Gets Decided.

Nvidia Says It Will Double Chip Sales Next Year. The Supply Chain Is Where That Gets Decided.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang forecasted doubling chip sales next year, but the company's CFO frames this as the supply-unconstrained scenario, signaling that supply chain capacity, not demand, is the real constraint. Nvidia and Palantir launched a collaboration to apply AI to Nvidia's own supply chain operations to identify bottlenecks and allocate materials more effectively.

  • 01Nvidia's doubling forecast depends on supply chain throughput, not demand—the company itself is supply constrained according to CFO Colette Kress.
  • 02Nvidia and Palantir said their first sovereign AI deployment for Nvidia’s operations is designed to spot supply constraints earlier and improve how materials are allocated across production.
  • 03Enterprise buyers should plan for competitive allocation pressure, higher networking and infrastructure costs alongside GPU spending, and the emergence of on-premises architectures as first-class options.

Sep 20, 2026

Fifth Third, Priority and CSI deals put a premium on payments built into software

Fifth Third, Priority and CSI deals put a premium on payments built into software

Fifth Third led a strategic investment in Payload, Priority Commerce agreed to acquire IntelliPay, and CSI acquired Qolo in a series of summer transactions, PYMNTS reported. Together, the deals point to buyers valuing payments technology already integrated into the software customers use, not just standalone processing capacity. For operators, that means the entity holding payment data can change hands without the front-end software changing.

  • 01BCG puts software providers with integrated payments at 36% of small and midsize business acquiring revenue in 2024, heading to 45% by 2028, a benchmark for where merchant payment spend is shifting.
  • 02Finance and IT leaders at firms running property, practice management or utility billing software should check who actually owns the payment module in their contract, because that is the asset being bought.

Sep 19, 2026

System integrators decide whether factory tech pays off, Smart Industry argues

System integrators decide whether factory tech pays off, Smart Industry argues

Smart Industry’s Sept. 9, 2026 piece argues plant technology creates no business value until system integrators fit it into existing systems, operations and workflows. Related summer coverage highlights upskilling, institutional knowledge and technician demand alongside the same integration-and-deployment theme. The framing shifts attention from which platform to buy to who implements it and how the engagement is scoped.

  • 01Smart Industry's framing moves the buying question from which platform to license to who integrates it and how that engagement is scoped, which puts the system integrator line item at the center of the return rather than in implementation overhead.
  • 02Gartner figures cited by Quality Magazine show 24% of industrial enterprises using IoT have implemented digital twins and 42% plan to, suggesting most IoT-using plants still have digital twin integration work ahead.
  • 03The Deloitte and Manufacturing Institute report, as covered by Smart Industry, says AI can embed skills into workflows to address technician demand; the sharper question for a plant manager is whether that changes headcount or changes what each technician can cover.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

Mark Beccue
Mark Beccue

Principal Analyst, AI and Automation at EY

Mark Beccue is a principal analyst focused on artificial intelligence and automation at EY. He covers enterprise AI adoption, risk management, and emerging AI policy and governance trends. His research helps organizations navigate the strategic and operational implications of deploying AI technologies.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Software & Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512