Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

As Organizations Ask If They “Should” Launch AI Projects, A Risk Management System Becomes Essential

Four leading US AI companies — Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI — have formed the Frontier Model Forum to collaboratively address advanced AI risks and establish industry safety standards. The initiative includes commitments to risk management tools such as watermarking to distinguish AI-generated content from human-produced content. As organizations evaluate whether to launch AI projects, a structured AI risk management framework is becoming essential.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Mark Beccue · Ai EthicsAi IntegrationData PrivacyData Transparency
Share

Key takeaways

01

Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI launched the Frontier Model Forum to set safety and security standards for advanced AI.

02

Member companies are committing to risk management tools like watermarking to label AI-generated content.

03

Organizations considering AI projects increasingly need formal risk management systems to govern deployment responsibly.

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Software & Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Software & Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Four major US AI firms, including Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, and ChatGPT’s creator OpenAI, have launched the Frontier Model Forum to address advanced AI risks and establish industry standards. This collaborative initiative emphasizes safety, security, and trust, with companies committing to risk management system tools like watermarking systems to differentiate AI-generated from human-produced content.

Companies know AI is not merely about integrating the latest algorithms or using vast data sets. At its core, it’s about making critical decisions that affect stakeholders, users, and the general public. That’s why, as AI weaves its way deeper into our daily operations, the real question companies should grapple with isn’t, “Can I implement this AI?”, but rather, “Should I?”

As such, before diving headfirst into AI development, organizations need to assess the ethical dimensions, from bias and accuracy to transparency and data privacy. That’s where a risk management system comes into play. Expert Mark Beccue, Research Director of AI at The Futurum Group, weighs in with further analysis on just how a risk management system can help a business set ethical standards for their AI practices.

Mark’s Thoughts:

“An organization shouldn’t be asking, ‘Can I do this AI?’ It really should be asking, rather, ‘Should I do this AI?’ And you look at that through the lens of: Does it make sense for our organization? What risks are we going to take?

Hi. I’m Mark Beccue. I’m the Research Director of AI at the Futurum Group.

Thinking about this question, it is interesting that some of the leaders in the hyperscalers space have come forward to volunteer some best practices. And I think the first thing we have to think about when you talk about recommendations is that any organization that’s looking at AI or working on AI right now should build their own AI risk management structure for their organization. And what I mean by that is you’re going to look for governance tools, AI governance tools. It starts with risk management, risk assessments. But it really should include an oversight team and really life cycle management.

It’s really kind of soup to nuts how you do AI really comes down to working on understanding the risks for your company. And, you know, that’s really aside from things that are happening with standards and stuff like that. Because there’s lots of risks involved and you need to understand them.

When you look at AI risk management, and another best practice is to think about the core areas of focus, which really evolve around, AI ethics. And those are accuracy, which has to do with bias, transparency of AI, security, which also includes data privacy, and then fairness. So those are the core pieces that are in an AI risk management structure.

And there’s really another piece that you have to think about when you’re looking at AI going forward and how you’re going to look at standards, what best practices are. And it really comes down to a very simple question. An organization shouldn’t be asking, ‘Can I do this AI?’ It really should be asking, rather, ‘Should I do this AI?’ And you look at that through the lens of: Does it make sense for our organization? What risks are we going to take?

So, if you take that approach, the standards are going to come. It’s super early. There’s not a lot out there right yet that are very specific to AI. They will come. The laws and the standards will come.

There are some protections for organizations to kind of think about this a little more within GDPR. So that’s data privacy, which will cover a lot of AI things. And then there’s maybe some security issues. Not so much in standards, but what organizations do to vet technology or applications they use and think about that from their own perspective of what they face with security.

Last thing I’ll leave is there’s a really good resource for any organization that’s looking into this step, and that is it’s called aiethicist.org. And that has lots of frameworks, lots of resources from multiple organizations that are free that you can look at to start to think about how you’re going to set up your organization.”

Article written by Cara Schildmeyer.

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

An organization should be asking. It shouldn't be asking, can I do this AI? It really should be asking rather, should I do this and you look at that through the lens of does it make sense for our organization? What risks are we going to take? Hi. I'm Mark Becky. I'm a research director for AI at the futurum group. Thinking about this question. It is interesting that some of the leaders in the hyperscalers space have come forward to volunteer some best practices. And I think the first thing we have to think about when you talk about recommendations is that any organization that's looking at AI are working on AI right now should build their own AI risk management structure for their organization. And what I mean by that is you're you're gonna look for governance tools, AI governance tools. It starts with risk management, risk assessment, But it really should include an oversight team and really life cycle management. It's really kind of soup the nuts how you do AI really comes down to working on understanding the risks for your company. And, you know, that's really aside from things that are happening with, standards and stuff like that. Because there's lots of risk involved and you need to understand them. When you look at AI risk management and another best practice is to think about the core areas of focus, which really evolve around, AI ethics. And those are accuracy, which has to do with bias transparency of AI security, which also includes data privacy, and then fairness. So those are the core pieces that are in an AI risk management, structure. And there's really another piece that you have to think about when you're looking at AI going forward and how you're gonna look at standards, what best practices are. And it really comes down to a very simple question. An organization should be asking it shouldn't be asking, can I do this AI? It really should be asking rather, should I do this AI? And you look at that through the lens of does it make sense for our organization? What risks are we going to take? So if you take that approach the standards standards are gonna come. It's super early. There's not a lot out there right yet that are very specific to AI. They will calm the laws and the standards will come. There are some protections for organizations to kind of think about this a little more with with within GDPR. So that's day privacy, which will cover a lot of AI things. And then there's maybe some security issues, not not so much in standards, but what organizations do to vet technology or applications they use and think about that from their own perspective of what they face with, with security. Last thing I'll leave is there's a really good resource for any organization that's looking into this step, and that is it's called ai ethicist dot org. And that has lots of frameworks, lots resources from multiple organizations for, that are free that you can look at to start to think about how you're gonna set up your organization.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Software & Technology starts with a company putting its solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Buyers ask AI engines who to consider, and published expert answers are what those engines cite.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

Mark Beccue
Mark BeccueResearch Director

Mark Beccue is a veteran market research analyst with more than 25 years of experience in market research and business strategy. Mark is one of a handful of pioneering analysts who began to focus on AI market research in 2015. Today with Futurum Group and previously as a principal analyst within the AI practice area at Omdia and Tractica, he has advised clients and provided them with syndicated and custom qualitative AI research services. His expertise in AI use cases, applications and software, natural language AI and broader trends surrounding AI market adoption have made him a well-known and sought after speaker, panel moderator, conference chair and media resource within the AI business community. He has served in those roles for events including the AI Summits in London, Singapore, New York and Silicon Valley, IOT World, Smart Home Summit, UX Next and Telco AI Europe. Prior to joining Tractica, Mark was an independent market research analyst focused on emerging technologies. Before going independent, Mark served as in house market intelligence analyst for Syniverse, where he helped guide overall business and product line strategies. For 4 years Mark worked as a Senior Analyst for ABI Research, a global technology research firm, focusing on mobile consumer services. Prior to ABI, Mark worked for 10 years for Syniverse in product management, greenhouse innovation and marketing. Specialties: AI B2B and B2C market intelligence, analysis and insights. Natural Language AI. Operationalizing AI in the Enterprise. AI market adoption trends and issues. Strengths - AI and other technical market analysis designed for business readers, writing, thought leadership, forecasting, market sizing

Follow Software & Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Software & Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers into the articles, video, and social content Software & Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Software & Technology Insights

Anthropic’s mega-IPO prep is forcing enterprise buyers to treat AI vendors like long-term critical infrastructure

Anthropic’s mega-IPO prep is forcing enterprise buyers to treat AI vendors like long-term critical infrastructure

Anthropic is preparing for a large IPO, comparable to SpaceX's record-setting one. This move is causing enterprise buyers to consider AI vendors as long-term critical infrastructure. The company's revenue run rate and policies are influencing this shift in procurement strategy.

  • 01Anthropic is planning an IPO that could rival SpaceX's in size.
  • 02Enterprise buyers are starting to view AI vendors as essential long-term infrastructure.
  • 03Anthropic's current revenue run rate and policies are driving changes in procurement approaches.

Aug 22, 2026

Airwallex’s $320 million Series H pushes fintech buying teams to price “autonomous finance” into payables and treasury RFPs

Airwallex’s $320 million Series H pushes fintech buying teams to price “autonomous finance” into payables and treasury RFPs

Airwallex has secured $320 million in Series H funding to enhance its agentic bookkeeping and wallet checkout solutions. This investment will prompt finance and IT teams to rethink payment stacks for better control. The focus on 'autonomous finance' suggests a shift towards more integrated financial operations.

  • 01Airwallex raised $320 million in Series H funding.
  • 02Finance and IT teams are encouraged to integrate clearer controls in payment stacks.
  • 03The concept of 'autonomous finance' is driving changes in financial operations.

Aug 21, 2026

Financial services will outspend most U.S. industries in 2026, and H1 B2B tech buying shows where the contracts are moving

Financial services will outspend most U.S. industries in 2026, and H1 B2B tech buying shows where the contracts are moving

The U.S. financial services industry is projected to have a tech budget of $495 billion by 2026. Recent tracking of B2B purchases indicates an acceleration in technology adoption in areas such as security and AI foundations. The financial sector is expected to outspend most other U.S. industries on technology.

  • 01U.S. financial services tech budgets are forecasted to reach $495 billion in 2026.
  • 02B2B purchases in H1 show rapid cycles in security and AI foundations.
  • 03The financial sector is set to outspend most U.S. industries on technology by 2026.

Aug 20, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

Mark Beccue
Mark Beccue

Principal Analyst, AI and Automation at EY

Mark Beccue is a principal analyst focused on artificial intelligence and automation at EY. He covers enterprise AI adoption, risk management, and emerging AI policy and governance trends. His research helps organizations navigate the strategic and operational implications of deploying AI technologies.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Software & Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512