Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

Cybersecurity Professionals Say They Lack Confidence in Stopping Breaches. Here’s What They Say is to Blame and How to Fix It.

A recent Exabeam survey of 500 IT professionals reveals that many cybersecurity specialists feel under-resourced, overworked, and inadequately trained to proactively prevent breaches. The findings highlight systemic gaps in staffing, tooling, and organizational support that undermine confidence across the profession. The article examines the root causes identified by respondents and proposes actionable remedies.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By carey.scott · · Business OperationsCyber-attacksCybersecurity ProfessionalsData Breaches
Share

Key takeaways

01

Many cybersecurity professionals lack confidence in their ability to stop breaches due to insufficient resources and training.

02

Exabeam's survey of 500 IT professionals exposes widespread feelings of being understaffed and overwhelmed.

03

Addressing the gap requires improvements in workforce investment, tooling, and organizational prioritization of cybersecurity.

Free workspace

Turn your Software & Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Cybersecurity professionals are voicing concerns over their ability to actually perform cybersecurity. Exabeam’s recent survey of 500 IT professionals sheds light on just how strained they perceive their workloads, resources, and training to be. According to the report, many cybersecurity specialists feel under-resourced and unable to adequately carry out their duties as proactive cybersafety strategists. This could result in additional data breaches, cyberattacks, and other security incidents that have the potential to significantly harm individuals and businesses.

It’s not crystal clear just who’s to blame here, but it’s obvious that IT professionals need a strategy change and a better approach to leveraging their existing tools or to getting equipped with new ones. The survey showed that cybersecurity professionals seem overly confident (some 97% of respondents) in their abilities to prevent attacks, perhaps reflecting their assessment of self-worth and gumption to get the job done. But when pressed further about realities on the ground, only 62% said they feel confident telling their managers that the network is experiencing zero breaches at any given time, and another 43% said they see themselves as “unable to prevent bad things from happening.”

So why is it that so many professionals continue to report a lack of confidence in their role’s success and a lack of holistic visibility over their networks? How can analyzing the strategic issues constraining cybersecurity professionals today help reveal the right solutions? To answer these questions and dig deeper into the survey, Tyler Farrar, Chief Information Security Officer at Exabeam, shares his thoughts on the report.

Tyler’s Thoughts

“97% of the 500 US Security professional respondents reported feeling confident that they are well-equipped with the tools and the processes they need to prevent and identify intrusions.

But when we analyzed these results further, we found some contradictions in these claims. Our research actually highlighted that the inability to prevent bad things from happening is the worst part of a security job. We had more than a third of our respondents unsure that they could even tell their boards that they had no adversaries inside their network.

Now, the threat landscape is constantly evolving and we’re constantly seeing new threats and attack techniques emerge. I know that attempting to keep up with these changes and stay ahead of attackers is challenging and very overwhelming. That’s even true for some of the most experienced cybersecurity professionals out there.

It is a game of cat and mouse and professionals feel like they’re always playing catch up. This creates a lack of confidence and their ability to protect their organization’s networks. So, here’s a few reasons. Cybersecurity professionals lack that confidence. The first one’s organizational, cybersecurity is not always a priority for some organizations, cybersecurity can become siloed within the organization.

There may be limited resources allocated to this space. There could be inadequate training and education. For example, there may be a limited cybersecurity budget for your tools and technologies. Maybe there’s not enough staff at your disposal to properly manage and monitor the organization’s networks. It creates an overwhelming feeling of frustration; it undermines confidence and the ability to protect the organization and to work effectively across the organization.

The second one’s technical. On the technical side, there is a major complexity to modern networks, systems and just the overall evolving threat landscape. Modern networks are extremely complex and they use multiple layers of technology.

So, managing these and securing these networks are very challenging. There’s also an explosive growth and volume of data. And so Legacy SIEM Solutions and other security tools that aren’t purpose built for security, uh, lead to security professionals having to keep up with all of this new growth and data volume. Trying to manage that and the latest attacks and techniques will create a lack of visibility.

It also will require a much higher level of technical expertise. Cybersecurity professionals who lack that knowledge will feel overwhelmed, and it’s going to require ongoing training and education. So, if you have people that are not equipped to understand these new and rigorous concepts, they might fall behind.

Now, the third one is the human factor, and it’s really around the fear of failure. Cybersecurity professionals are under an immense amount of pressure to prevent cyber-attacks and protect their organizations. that type of pressure is acute and it is particularly high in high-stakes environments. It’s critical to national security, the intense pressure and long hours associated with what’s going on across these varying evolving tactics and techniques of attackers can lead to employee burnout.

Furthermore, it can also lead to indecision when a true security incident occurs. Cybersecurity professionals feel like the consequences of failure are so great that it leads to a lack of confidence in their ability to meet high expectations. So, without having a strong and effective cybersecurity posture, these aspects can have a significant impact on business operations and network security.

It also makes organizations vulnerable to a range of threats, cyber-attacks, data breaches, and security incidents. An organization could or will experience downtime or disruption to their business operations, which is an extremely costly and damaging feat to encounter.

Once a successful breach occurs, it can result in the theft or loss of sensitive data, which leads to reputational damage and legal and financial liabilities. It’s the same thing with a malware infection or some other security incident that results in downtime for business operations. It can and will impact productivity and revenue.

In addition, a lack of resources and tools to monitor networks effectively can result in cybersecurity professionals being unable to identify and respond to threats in a very timely manner. This allows attackers to persist in an organization’s network. It increases the risk of a data breach or data loss and operational disruption.

And overall, both business operations and network security are very closely linked to the effectiveness of an organization’s security posture. Organizations have to address all factors that contribute to the lack of visibility and confidence in cybersecurity to ensure that these networks and the data are protected from this ever-evolving threat landscape.

It’s going to take a coordinated effort and this is between the private sector and various influential cybersecurity professionals, organizations and government agencies. And this can happen in a variety of ways. One of the big ones is the overall improvement of training and education. It is essential to provide all cybersecurity professionals regardless of experience with initial access to education and baseline and ongoing training, etc., to keep up with evolving threats and attack techniques.

And this is both for technical and non-technical training. Technical training focuses on a hands-on approach with different tools and technologies, while non-technical training focuses on educating professionals on how to communicate and collaborate effectively.

The second piece is it just increasing the overall collaboration. Cybersecurity professionals have to work more closely with other teams within their organizations. It’s the only way to really develop a holistic approach to cybersecurity while simultaneously ensuring the space is integrated into all organizational operations.

The third one is the further investment in new technology and tools that can help organizations effectively monitor threats across their organization and respond to security incidents. This can include advanced threat detection and response, as well as user behavior and device behavior analytics.

Next, create clear roles and responsibilities both within the organization and outside of it, using more of a macro lens. It’s important to ensure that roles and responsibilities are set across the organization for cybersecurity responsibilities and that each team has the resources and support needed to carry out these rules effectively.

This can include developing an incident response plan, having the authority and autonomy needed to make decisions during a security incident. And finally cultivate an organization-wide culture of cybersecurity that stresses cooperation, continual education, risk awareness, and continuous development. This will enable cybersecurity professionals to input and impart their expertise and experience to others, and it fosters cybersecurity awareness and best practices throughout the enterprise.”

Article written by Sonia Gossai.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Software & Technology starts with a company putting its solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Buyers ask AI engines who to consider, and published expert answers are what those engines cite.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

C
carey.scott
B2B Weekly

The week in Software & Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Software & Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers into the articles, video, and social content Software & Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Software & Technology Insights

Binance pauses withdrawals after a theft it puts at $6.3 billion, the largest crypto hack on record

Binance pauses withdrawals after a theft it puts at $6.3 billion, the largest crypto hack on record

Binance disclosed on Oct. 29 that attackers drained its hot wallets across ten or more blockchains, an impact the exchange estimates at about $6.3 billion. Withdrawals are paused while it rebuilds its withdrawal service, about $3 billion has been frozen by stablecoin issuers and others, and Binance says it will cover every loss with company funds. Three blockchain analytics firms attribute the attack to North Korea's TraderTraitor group; Binance and governments have not.

  • 01Binance estimates the impact at about $6.3 billion; TRM Labs counts $6.36 billion and Elliptic $6.43 billion at time-of-theft prices.
  • 02Most of the funds left in about 20 minutes from 20:05 UTC on Oct. 29, with a second wave around 23:00 UTC, according to TRM Labs and Elliptic.
  • 03Withdrawals have been paused since about 22:15 UTC; Binance expects to restore them within 45 to 48 hours and has set aside more than $6.34 billion to cover losses.

Oct 30, 2026

CISA confirms PHP2Shell exploitation and gives federal agencies until Oct. 29 to patch

CISA confirms PHP2Shell exploitation and gives federal agencies until Oct. 29 to patch

Both PHP2Shell CVEs entered the KEV catalog on October 26 with a three-day federal civilian deadline under BOD 26-04; fixed versions are 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36 and 8.2.35.

  • 01Both PHP2Shell CVEs entered the KEV catalog on October 26 with a three-day federal deadline under BOD 26-04; fixed versions are 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36 and 8.2.35.
  • 02A Perplexity researcher logged 35 successful shell executions on honeypots, though the setup may not reflect production, and Delft University tracked 50,000+ exploit requests from 600+ IPs.

Oct 28, 2026

Zoom's 2030 growth target rests on customers buying more than meetings

Zoom's 2030 growth target rests on customers buying more than meetings

Zoom Communications gave its first time-bound long-range target at Zoomtopia 2026: 6% to 8% revenue growth in fiscal 2030. The target includes double-digit growth in enterprise revenue. Phone reaches only 29% of Meetings enterprise accounts today.

  • 01Zoom Phone sits in 29% of Zoom's enterprise Meetings accounts, and the fiscal 2030 growth plan reads largely as a bet on the other 71%.
  • 02Customers on three or more Zoom products had 43% lower dollar churn than customers on one or two, which Zoom cited as support for its land-and-expand strategy.
  • 03Zoom's non-current remaining performance obligations rose 25%, which Chang tied to larger, longer-term and multi-product platform agreements. For buyers weighing Phone or Contact Center, contract length is worth a close look.

Oct 27, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

C
carey.scott

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Software & Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512