Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

NYT vs. OpenAI: Media Agencies Deserve Regular Payments for Intellectual Property in the AI Era

In the wake of The New York Times’ lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft for allegedly using its content without compensation, the media industry faces a pivotal moment in defining the value of its intellectual property in the AI era. This legal action underscores a growing concern: How should media outlets be compensated for the…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Joanna Massey · ChatgptDr. Joanna Dodd MasseyHollywood Foreign Press AssociationMicrosoft
Share

Key takeaways

01

In the wake of The New York Times’ lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft for allegedly using its content without compensation, the media industry faces a pivotal moment in defining the value of its intellectual property in the AI era.

02

This legal action underscores a growing concern: How should media outlets be compensated for the…

In the wake of The New York Times’ lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft for allegedly using its content without compensation, the media industry faces a pivotal moment in defining the value of its intellectual property in the AI era. This legal action underscores a growing concern: How should media outlets be compensated for the use of their content by AI technologies like large language models, and what does this mean for the protection of intellectual property in the AI era?

Joanna Dodd Massey, Ph.D., an Independent Director at the Hollywood Foreign Press Association with a rich background in technology, psychology, and media, and former communications leader at major corporations like CBS and Condé Nast, offered a compelling perspective on this issue.

“The question is, how much should they be paid? So, and I think there’s two levels to that payment, in my estimation. One of them is, how much should they be paid for the information that was used to initially train the LLMs? And then the second question is, how much should they continue to be paid on a regular basis to allow the LLMs access into their databases to continue to be trained and to continue to be able to give out information?” Dr. Massey said.

Article written by MarketScale.

About the author

Joanna Massey
Joanna MasseyCEO & Director

Dr. Joanna Dodd Massey is a seasoned C-level communications executive and Board Director with more than 25 years of experience in the media industry at companies such as Condé Nast, Lionsgate, CBS, Viacom, Discovery and Hasbro. She has managed crisis communications, brand reputation, culture transformation, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and multi-million-dollar P&Ls. Currently, Dr. Massey is President & CEO of J. D. Massey Associates, Inc. (JDMA), which provides marketing communications services, executive training and business publishing by using neuroscience and communications tactics to help management teams influence internal and external stakeholders. She is also a sought-after corporate speaker, a Board Director for startups and nonprofits, an adjunct professor at Columbia University, and the author of two books, CultureShock: Surviving Five Generations in One Workplace and Communicating During a Crisis: Influencing Others When the Stakes AreHigh.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Software & Technology Insights

Gemini 3.5 Pro Is Still in Preview Entering the Second Week of July. Here's What Enterprise Teams Evaluating a Model Should Do About It.

Gemini 3.5 Pro Is Still in Preview Entering the Second Week of July. Here's What Enterprise Teams Evaluating a Model Should Do About It.

Google's Gemini 3.5 Pro remained in limited preview into July 2026 due to token efficiency and reasoning performance concerns, signaling that enterprises must now evaluate AI models on cost-per-task rather than raw specs. Enterprise teams should architect workflows around stable API contracts, assess models by total operating cost, and hedge roadmaps with generally available alternatives rather than wait for unconfirmed vendor timelines.

  • 01Token efficiency has become a procurement metric for enterprises, as operating cost per completed task now matters more than benchmark scores or context window size
  • 02Enterprise teams should build against API interfaces rather than specific models to enable seamless model swaps at general availability with minimal rework
  • 03Hedging model strategy with generally available alternatives protects project delivery timelines when a vendor's release date remains uncertain

Jul 6, 2026

AI cost reality bites: Uber, Starbucks, and the enterprise ROI reckoning

AI cost reality bites: Uber, Starbucks, and the enterprise ROI reckoning

Uber and Starbucks faced significant challenges with their AI investments. Uber exhausted its entire 2026 AI budget within just four months, and Starbucks decided to discontinue its AI inventory system after only nine months. These experiences highlight the growing demand for verified return on investment in enterprise AI projects.

  • 01Uber used up its 2026 AI budget in four months.
  • 02Starbucks discontinued its AI inventory system after nine months.
  • 03Enterprises are now focused on confirming AI's ROI.

Jul 5, 2026

Enterprise AI's center of gravity shifts from models to orchestration, governance, and ROI clarity

Enterprise AI's center of gravity shifts from models to orchestration, governance, and ROI clarity

The focus of enterprise AI is shifting from simply choosing models to emphasizing orchestration, governance, and ensuring return on investment. CIOs are now concerned with integrating AI effectively within their architectures and demonstrating clear financial outcomes to CFOs. This trend is expected to shape the landscape of enterprise AI in the coming years.

  • 01Enterprise AI is moving beyond model selection to focus on orchestration and governance.
  • 02CIOs must integrate AI to show clear ROI to CFOs.
  • 03AI's role within organizational architecture is becoming more significant.

Jul 5, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

Joanna Massey
Joanna Massey

CEO & Director

Dr. Joanna Dodd Massey is a seasoned C-level communications executive and Board Director with more than 25 years of experience in the media industry at companies such as Condé Nast, Lionsgate, CBS, Viacom, Discovery and Hasbro. She has managed crisis communications, brand reputation, culture transformation, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and multi-million-dollar P&Ls. Currently, Dr. Massey is President & CEO of J. D. Massey Associates, Inc. (JDMA), which provides marketing communications services, executive training and business publishing by using neuroscience and communications tactics to help management teams influence internal and external stakeholders. She is also a sought-after corporate speaker, a Board Director for startups and nonprofits, an adjunct professor at Columbia University, and the author of two books, CultureShock: Surviving Five Generations in One Workplace and Communicating During a Crisis: Influencing Others When the Stakes AreHigh.