Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

Navigating AI Malpractice in Healthcare: Balancing Revolutionary Benefits and Growing Concerns

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning.  Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Software And Technology · AccountabilityAiArtificial IntelligenceChatgpt
Share

Key takeaways

01

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning.

02

Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of…

Get featured

Want MarketScale to feature Software & Technology?

Book a 15-minute demo and we'll map your Software & Technology expertise to the content buyers are searching for.

Book a demo

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning. Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of AI to revolutionize diagnoses, cut waiting times, and provide remote consultations. But with great power comes great responsibility, and cases of AI misdiagnoses and improper medical advice have already raised red flags. Are we truly prepared to entrust our health to AI, and if things go south, who will be held accountable for AI malpractice in healthcare?

While AI innovations like ChatGPT and Google’s chatbot-integrated search feature hold promise for improving healthcare, concerns around the quality and reliability of AI-generated medical advice are growing. A notable example was when Jeremy Faust, an emergency medicine physician, tested ChatGPT and discovered that the sources cited by the AI did not even exist. Calls for the implementation of minimum standards for AI technologies in healthcare are becoming louder, but the question of responsibility for AI malpractice in healthcare remains unanswered.

Liudmila Schafer, MD, FAC, Medical Oncologist at The Doctor Connect, delves into the double-edged sword of AI in healthcare, emphasizing the importance of striking a balance between its potential benefits and pitfalls.

Liudmila’s Thoughts:

“Artificial Intelligence has been invading the healthcare system for a while. AI has the potential to be both helpful and dangerous, and it depends on us how we develop, deploy and regulate it. 

On the bright side, AI in healthcare can be helpful. For example, we could use artificial intelligence tools and combine the skills of health and wellness coaches and motivational speakers with healthcare professionals such as board-certified physicians, nurses, and other healthcare workers to facilitate better coordination and collaboration in patient care. In the US, a federal rule was implemented to mandate Clinical notes to be shared with patients. 

In many circumstances, patients can’t even understand the doctor’s notes, and by reading them, patients get nervous and anxious and put themselves at risk trying to figure out what to do. AI could help to convert complex medical terminology to layman terminology. But patients are still reluctant to trust AI and want explanations from human doctors.

Artificial intelligence also could help to improve the interpretation and diagnosis of medical images. How can AI be dangerous? Currently, physicians and healthcare practitioners spend a significant amount of time dealing with technology. It requires up to 50 computer clicks necessary to place a single treatment order for one patient.

It increases the time the physicians spend with the computer and decreases the time with the patients, which decreases patient satisfaction and increased physician burnout. 

AI systems may store sensitive patient data, which can be vulnerable to hacking or other security bridges. AI can be biased, resulting in patients being misdiagnosed, and receiving less effective, or even ineffective treatment advice.

Who will be responsible? Even the AI system that is used makes a mistake and inappropriate diagnosis and treatment advice. Who will be responsible if ChatGPT delivers information that is malpractice, and who will correct it? It is essential to carefully consider the risks and benefits of AI in healthcare to ensure that AI is used ethically and responsibly to protect our safety and privacy.

Stay tuned as we discuss more on AI breakthroughs in the healthcare industry.

Article written by: Azam Saghir

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Software & Technology starts with a company putting its solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Buyers ask AI engines who to consider, and published expert answers are what those engines cite.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

SA
Software And Technology

Follow Software & Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Software & Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers into the articles, video, and social content Software & Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Software & Technology Insights

Financial services will outspend most U.S. industries in 2026, and H1 B2B tech buying shows where the contracts are moving

Financial services will outspend most U.S. industries in 2026, and H1 B2B tech buying shows where the contracts are moving

The U.S. financial services industry is projected to have a tech budget of $495 billion by 2026. Recent tracking of B2B purchases indicates an acceleration in technology adoption in areas such as security and AI foundations. The financial sector is expected to outspend most other U.S. industries on technology.

  • 01U.S. financial services tech budgets are forecasted to reach $495 billion in 2026.
  • 02B2B purchases in H1 show rapid cycles in security and AI foundations.
  • 03The financial sector is set to outspend most U.S. industries on technology by 2026.

Aug 20, 2026

Etched’s $21 billion valuation forces AI inference buyers to treat racks as contracts, not chips

Etched’s $21 billion valuation forces AI inference buyers to treat racks as contracts, not chips

With a $21 billion valuation, Etched is prompting a shift in how AI inference buyers approach procurement, focusing on racks rather than individual chips. Etched's significant valuation, fueled by a $700 million funding round, underscores the evolving economics of AI inference. This approach emphasizes the importance for enterprises to consider racks as long-term infrastructure investments.

  • 01Etched's $700 million funding round has propelled its valuation to $21 billion.
  • 02AI inference buyers should treat racks as enduring contracts, not just individual components.
  • 03The economics of AI inference are evolving, necessitating changes in procurement strategies.

Aug 19, 2026

Groq’s $350M neocloud push and Relay’s shutdown put more pressure on enterprise AI runbooks than on model choice

Groq’s $350M neocloud push and Relay’s shutdown put more pressure on enterprise AI runbooks than on model choice

Groq's significant investment in neocloud capacity and the shutdown of Relay with its integration into Google's Chrome team highlight operational challenges in maintaining continuity and control in AI automation. This landscape shift pressures enterprise AI runbooks rather than the choice of AI models. Companies must adapt to these transitions to ensure operational stability and strategic advantage in the AI sector.

  • 01Groq has invested $350 million in expanding its neocloud capabilities.
  • 02Relay has been shut down and integrated into Google's Chrome team.
  • 03Enterprise AI runbooks are under pressure due to changes in continuity and control.

Aug 19, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

SA
Software And Technology

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Software & Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512