Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Software & Technology

Navigating AI Malpractice in Healthcare: Balancing Revolutionary Benefits and Growing Concerns

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning.  Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Software And Technology · AccountabilityAiArtificial IntelligenceChatgpt
Share

Key takeaways

01

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning.

02

Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of…

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning. Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of AI to revolutionize diagnoses, cut waiting times, and provide remote consultations. But with great power comes great responsibility, and cases of AI misdiagnoses and improper medical advice have already raised red flags. Are we truly prepared to entrust our health to AI, and if things go south, who will be held accountable for AI malpractice in healthcare?

While AI innovations like ChatGPT and Google’s chatbot-integrated search feature hold promise for improving healthcare, concerns around the quality and reliability of AI-generated medical advice are growing. A notable example was when Jeremy Faust, an emergency medicine physician, tested ChatGPT and discovered that the sources cited by the AI did not even exist. Calls for the implementation of minimum standards for AI technologies in healthcare are becoming louder, but the question of responsibility for AI malpractice in healthcare remains unanswered.

Liudmila Schafer, MD, FAC, Medical Oncologist at The Doctor Connect, delves into the double-edged sword of AI in healthcare, emphasizing the importance of striking a balance between its potential benefits and pitfalls.

Liudmila’s Thoughts:

“Artificial Intelligence has been invading the healthcare system for a while. AI has the potential to be both helpful and dangerous, and it depends on us how we develop, deploy and regulate it. 

On the bright side, AI in healthcare can be helpful. For example, we could use artificial intelligence tools and combine the skills of health and wellness coaches and motivational speakers with healthcare professionals such as board-certified physicians, nurses, and other healthcare workers to facilitate better coordination and collaboration in patient care. In the US, a federal rule was implemented to mandate Clinical notes to be shared with patients. 

In many circumstances, patients can’t even understand the doctor’s notes, and by reading them, patients get nervous and anxious and put themselves at risk trying to figure out what to do. AI could help to convert complex medical terminology to layman terminology. But patients are still reluctant to trust AI and want explanations from human doctors.

Artificial intelligence also could help to improve the interpretation and diagnosis of medical images. How can AI be dangerous? Currently, physicians and healthcare practitioners spend a significant amount of time dealing with technology. It requires up to 50 computer clicks necessary to place a single treatment order for one patient.

It increases the time the physicians spend with the computer and decreases the time with the patients, which decreases patient satisfaction and increased physician burnout. 

AI systems may store sensitive patient data, which can be vulnerable to hacking or other security bridges. AI can be biased, resulting in patients being misdiagnosed, and receiving less effective, or even ineffective treatment advice.

Who will be responsible? Even the AI system that is used makes a mistake and inappropriate diagnosis and treatment advice. Who will be responsible if ChatGPT delivers information that is malpractice, and who will correct it? It is essential to carefully consider the risks and benefits of AI in healthcare to ensure that AI is used ethically and responsibly to protect our safety and privacy.

Stay tuned as we discuss more on AI breakthroughs in the healthcare industry.

Article written by: Azam Saghir

About the author

SA
Software And Technology

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Software & Technology companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Software & Technology Insights

Strong AI governance can lower insurance premiums and board liability

Strong AI governance can lower insurance premiums and board liability

AI governance platforms in the insurance industry are proposed to offer benefits similar to those provided by responsible behavior in other insurance areas, like health and auto policies. The proponents argue that implementing strong AI governance can lead to lower insurance premiums for companies and reduce liability concerns for board members. This concept aligns with existing practices of rewarding safety and risk management measures with financial incentives.

  • 01AI governance can reduce insurance premiums.
  • 02Proper governance lowers board liability in companies.
  • 03Insurance rewards responsible risk management behavior.

Jun 26, 2026

Ascendion's CTO: Design thinking, not coding speed, is engineering's future

Ascendion's CTO: Design thinking, not coding speed, is engineering's future

Ascendion's CTO Wesley Pullin emphasizes that design thinking will lead the future of engineering instead of the pace of coding. With extensive experience in major software companies, Pullin's approach prioritizes innovative problem-solving strategies. His background at CloudBees has influenced his progressive outlook at Ascendion.

  • 01Design thinking is pivotal for the future of engineering.
  • 02Wesley Pullin has extensive experience in software development.
  • 03The Jenkins ecosystem was a significant part of Pullin's past work.

Jun 26, 2026

CFOs tighten AI budgets as agentic platforms and hardware deals reshape enterprise AI in 2026

CFOs tighten AI budgets as agentic platforms and hardware deals reshape enterprise AI in 2026

CFOs are becoming more cautious with AI budgets, focusing on immediate returns on investment. Agentic platforms and hardware deal innovations are shaping the future of enterprise AI markets. Financial discipline is becoming essential as new technological advancements in AI infrastructure emerge.

  • 01CFOs emphasize ROI in AI investments.
  • 02Agentic platforms and hardware deals drive AI evolution.
  • 03Financial discipline is key in the changing AI landscape.

Jun 26, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

SA
Software And Technology