Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

Navigating AI Malpractice in Healthcare: Balancing Revolutionary Benefits and Growing Concerns

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning.  Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Software And Technology · AccountabilityAiArtificial IntelligenceChatgpt
Share

Key takeaways

01

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning.

02

Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of…

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Software & Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Software & Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning. Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of AI to revolutionize diagnoses, cut waiting times, and provide remote consultations. But with great power comes great responsibility, and cases of AI misdiagnoses and improper medical advice have already raised red flags. Are we truly prepared to entrust our health to AI, and if things go south, who will be held accountable for AI malpractice in healthcare?

While AI innovations like ChatGPT and Google’s chatbot-integrated search feature hold promise for improving healthcare, concerns around the quality and reliability of AI-generated medical advice are growing. A notable example was when Jeremy Faust, an emergency medicine physician, tested ChatGPT and discovered that the sources cited by the AI did not even exist. Calls for the implementation of minimum standards for AI technologies in healthcare are becoming louder, but the question of responsibility for AI malpractice in healthcare remains unanswered.

Liudmila Schafer, MD, FAC, Medical Oncologist at The Doctor Connect, delves into the double-edged sword of AI in healthcare, emphasizing the importance of striking a balance between its potential benefits and pitfalls.

Liudmila’s Thoughts:

“Artificial Intelligence has been invading the healthcare system for a while. AI has the potential to be both helpful and dangerous, and it depends on us how we develop, deploy and regulate it. 

On the bright side, AI in healthcare can be helpful. For example, we could use artificial intelligence tools and combine the skills of health and wellness coaches and motivational speakers with healthcare professionals such as board-certified physicians, nurses, and other healthcare workers to facilitate better coordination and collaboration in patient care. In the US, a federal rule was implemented to mandate Clinical notes to be shared with patients. 

In many circumstances, patients can’t even understand the doctor’s notes, and by reading them, patients get nervous and anxious and put themselves at risk trying to figure out what to do. AI could help to convert complex medical terminology to layman terminology. But patients are still reluctant to trust AI and want explanations from human doctors.

Artificial intelligence also could help to improve the interpretation and diagnosis of medical images. How can AI be dangerous? Currently, physicians and healthcare practitioners spend a significant amount of time dealing with technology. It requires up to 50 computer clicks necessary to place a single treatment order for one patient.

It increases the time the physicians spend with the computer and decreases the time with the patients, which decreases patient satisfaction and increased physician burnout. 

AI systems may store sensitive patient data, which can be vulnerable to hacking or other security bridges. AI can be biased, resulting in patients being misdiagnosed, and receiving less effective, or even ineffective treatment advice.

Who will be responsible? Even the AI system that is used makes a mistake and inappropriate diagnosis and treatment advice. Who will be responsible if ChatGPT delivers information that is malpractice, and who will correct it? It is essential to carefully consider the risks and benefits of AI in healthcare to ensure that AI is used ethically and responsibly to protect our safety and privacy.

Stay tuned as we discuss more on AI breakthroughs in the healthcare industry.

Article written by: Azam Saghir

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Software & Technology starts with a company putting its solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Buyers ask AI engines who to consider, and published expert answers are what those engines cite.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

SA
Software And Technology

Follow Software & Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Software & Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your solutions engineers, product teams, and customer engineers into the articles, video, and social content Software & Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Software & Technology Insights

OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra pitch is to skip integrations and run the software UI itself

OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra pitch is to skip integrations and run the software UI itself

OpenAI shipped GPT-6 Astra on Sept. 3 with a "computer use" capability that lets the model operate existing software UIs directly instead of requiring custom API integrations. The staged rollout through Daybreak, ChatGPT tiers, and AWS shifts the automation bottleneck from building connectors to governing UI-driven sessions, with speed measured in minutes per task as the cost input.

  • 01Astra operates software via pixels, keyboard, and mouse interactions to bypass API integration work on the long tail of internal tools without clean API access
  • 02OpenAI reported Astra at 40 minutes per task (47% faster than GPT-5.6 Sol at 75 minutes), making task time the practical proxy for compute cost modeling and throughput evaluation
  • 03Enterprises must define governance before broad rollout: eligible workflows for UI automation, audit logging systems, identity and secrets handling, and fallback procedures when UIs change or sessions break

Sep 3, 2026

Cloud is set to take 26% of IT budgets, and hiring is shifting toward platforms

Cloud is set to take 26% of IT budgets, and hiring is shifting toward platforms

Foundry’s 2026 Cloud Computing Study, cited by CIO, reports IT leaders expect 26% of IT budgets to go to cloud computing in the next year and that 74% accelerated cloud migrations in the last 12 months. At the same time, CIO’s coverage of Robert Half Technology’s 2026 IT salary report shows AI/ML engineers at a $170,750 median salary and a striking capability gap, with only 7% of leaders saying they have the capabilities to complete prioritized projects and 65% expecting to upskill existing staff. Separate reporting from Nextgov on senior appointments in the Pentagon CIO office, and Government Technology’s account of Illinois’ multi-agency data-sharing MOU, indicate large organizations are staffing for organizational change, governance, and cross-domain data sharing, not just for lift-and-shift migrations. For enterprise operators, the signal is that cloud programs increasingly depend on internal platform engineering, adoption enablement, and finance-aligned governance, because those functions connect migration speed to day-two operations and business results.

  • 01A useful benchmark for 2026 planning: Foundry’s survey puts cloud at 26% of IT budget next year, so showback/FinOps and workload-level chargeback governance can’t stay a side project (per CIO citing Foundry).
  • 02Talent pricing has become an input to architecture decisions. A CIO, citing Robert Half, compared the median pay for AI/ML engineers ($170,750) with systems administrators ($98,000), arguing that platform standardization and self-service guardrails are as much about labor strategy as technology.
  • 03If 65% of leaders expect to upskill to close gaps, the differentiator becomes your internal adoption system, in-app guidance, runbooks, and training telemetry, not the third new tool in the stack (per CIO citing Robert Half; illustrated by Ferring’s Whatfix rollout reported by BankInfoSecurity).

Sep 2, 2026

AI agents are pushing access controls and testing into the data layer

AI agents are pushing access controls and testing into the data layer

Snowflake is warning that dashboard-era access controls do not hold up once AI agents can query and act across datasets, pushing governance closer to the data layer, according to TechTarget’s Computer Weekly. In parallel, TechTarget reported that enterprise AI-agent testing needs to expand beyond pre-deployment checks into continuous monitoring so agents don’t drift beyond prescribed instructions. InformationWeek’s reporting on CISOs at Intuit, Smartsheet and ETS adds the operational risk: unmanaged “AI orphans” and identity sprawl as agent count grows, which shifts near-term workload onto IAM, data governance and platform engineering teams building the guardrails.

  • 01If an AI agent can reach multiple tools, the real control plane becomes the data layer and identity, not the BI dashboard permissions model.
  • 02Agent rollouts that stop at pre-production testing are likely to miss the failure mode operators actually see, post-deploy tool changes that alter what the agent can do.
  • 03“AI orphans” is a practical inventory problem: if teams can’t enumerate agents, they can’t set ownership, secrets rotation, or access reviews on a schedule.

Sep 2, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

SA
Software And Technology

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Software & Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512