Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

Navigating AI Malpractice in Healthcare: Balancing Revolutionary Benefits and Growing Concerns

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning.  Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Software And Technology · AccountabilityAiArtificial IntelligenceChatgpt
Share

Key takeaways

01

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning.

02

Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of…

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning. Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of AI to revolutionize diagnoses, cut waiting times, and provide remote consultations. But with great power comes great responsibility, and cases of AI misdiagnoses and improper medical advice have already raised red flags. Are we truly prepared to entrust our health to AI, and if things go south, who will be held accountable for AI malpractice in healthcare?

While AI innovations like ChatGPT and Google’s chatbot-integrated search feature hold promise for improving healthcare, concerns around the quality and reliability of AI-generated medical advice are growing. A notable example was when Jeremy Faust, an emergency medicine physician, tested ChatGPT and discovered that the sources cited by the AI did not even exist. Calls for the implementation of minimum standards for AI technologies in healthcare are becoming louder, but the question of responsibility for AI malpractice in healthcare remains unanswered.

Liudmila Schafer, MD, FAC, Medical Oncologist at The Doctor Connect, delves into the double-edged sword of AI in healthcare, emphasizing the importance of striking a balance between its potential benefits and pitfalls.

Liudmila’s Thoughts:

“Artificial Intelligence has been invading the healthcare system for a while. AI has the potential to be both helpful and dangerous, and it depends on us how we develop, deploy and regulate it. 

On the bright side, AI in healthcare can be helpful. For example, we could use artificial intelligence tools and combine the skills of health and wellness coaches and motivational speakers with healthcare professionals such as board-certified physicians, nurses, and other healthcare workers to facilitate better coordination and collaboration in patient care. In the US, a federal rule was implemented to mandate Clinical notes to be shared with patients. 

In many circumstances, patients can’t even understand the doctor’s notes, and by reading them, patients get nervous and anxious and put themselves at risk trying to figure out what to do. AI could help to convert complex medical terminology to layman terminology. But patients are still reluctant to trust AI and want explanations from human doctors.

Artificial intelligence also could help to improve the interpretation and diagnosis of medical images. How can AI be dangerous? Currently, physicians and healthcare practitioners spend a significant amount of time dealing with technology. It requires up to 50 computer clicks necessary to place a single treatment order for one patient.

It increases the time the physicians spend with the computer and decreases the time with the patients, which decreases patient satisfaction and increased physician burnout. 

AI systems may store sensitive patient data, which can be vulnerable to hacking or other security bridges. AI can be biased, resulting in patients being misdiagnosed, and receiving less effective, or even ineffective treatment advice.

Who will be responsible? Even the AI system that is used makes a mistake and inappropriate diagnosis and treatment advice. Who will be responsible if ChatGPT delivers information that is malpractice, and who will correct it? It is essential to carefully consider the risks and benefits of AI in healthcare to ensure that AI is used ethically and responsibly to protect our safety and privacy.

Stay tuned as we discuss more on AI breakthroughs in the healthcare industry.

Article written by: Azam Saghir

About the author

SA
Software And Technology

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Software & Technology Insights

AI cost reality bites: Uber, Starbucks, and the enterprise ROI reckoning

AI cost reality bites: Uber, Starbucks, and the enterprise ROI reckoning

Uber and Starbucks faced significant challenges with their AI investments. Uber exhausted its entire 2026 AI budget within just four months, and Starbucks decided to discontinue its AI inventory system after only nine months. These experiences highlight the growing demand for verified return on investment in enterprise AI projects.

  • 01Uber used up its 2026 AI budget in four months.
  • 02Starbucks discontinued its AI inventory system after nine months.
  • 03Enterprises are now focused on confirming AI's ROI.

Jul 5, 2026

Enterprise AI's center of gravity shifts from models to orchestration, governance, and ROI clarity

Enterprise AI's center of gravity shifts from models to orchestration, governance, and ROI clarity

The focus of enterprise AI is shifting from simply choosing models to emphasizing orchestration, governance, and ensuring return on investment. CIOs are now concerned with integrating AI effectively within their architectures and demonstrating clear financial outcomes to CFOs. This trend is expected to shape the landscape of enterprise AI in the coming years.

  • 01Enterprise AI is moving beyond model selection to focus on orchestration and governance.
  • 02CIOs must integrate AI to show clear ROI to CFOs.
  • 03AI's role within organizational architecture is becoming more significant.

Jul 5, 2026

Meta's cloud ambitions emerge as EU tightens rules on AWS and Azure

Meta's cloud ambitions emerge as EU tightens rules on AWS and Azure

Meta is developing a cloud business to monetize its excess AI compute resources. This move comes as the European Union intensifies its regulations on major cloud providers like AWS and Azure. The EU's Digital Markets Act could potentially reshape the cloud services market in Europe.

  • 01Meta is entering the cloud business to leverage excess AI compute.
  • 02AWS and Azure face increased scrutiny from new EU regulations.
  • 03The EU Digital Markets Act aims to regulate major cloud providers.

Jul 4, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

SA
Software And Technology