Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

Navigating AI Malpractice in Healthcare: Balancing Revolutionary Benefits and Growing Concerns

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning.  Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Software And Technology · AccountabilityAiArtificial IntelligenceChatgpt
Share

Key takeaways

01

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning.

02

Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of…

As the saying goes, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” This proverb rings truer than ever in the age of AI healthcare, where the potential for mistakes is groundbreaking and concerning. Since the rise of ChatGPT and similar AI platforms, healthcare has been buzzing with the potential of AI to revolutionize diagnoses, cut waiting times, and provide remote consultations. But with great power comes great responsibility, and cases of AI misdiagnoses and improper medical advice have already raised red flags. Are we truly prepared to entrust our health to AI, and if things go south, who will be held accountable for AI malpractice in healthcare?

While AI innovations like ChatGPT and Google’s chatbot-integrated search feature hold promise for improving healthcare, concerns around the quality and reliability of AI-generated medical advice are growing. A notable example was when Jeremy Faust, an emergency medicine physician, tested ChatGPT and discovered that the sources cited by the AI did not even exist. Calls for the implementation of minimum standards for AI technologies in healthcare are becoming louder, but the question of responsibility for AI malpractice in healthcare remains unanswered.

Liudmila Schafer, MD, FAC, Medical Oncologist at The Doctor Connect, delves into the double-edged sword of AI in healthcare, emphasizing the importance of striking a balance between its potential benefits and pitfalls.

Liudmila’s Thoughts:

“Artificial Intelligence has been invading the healthcare system for a while. AI has the potential to be both helpful and dangerous, and it depends on us how we develop, deploy and regulate it. 

On the bright side, AI in healthcare can be helpful. For example, we could use artificial intelligence tools and combine the skills of health and wellness coaches and motivational speakers with healthcare professionals such as board-certified physicians, nurses, and other healthcare workers to facilitate better coordination and collaboration in patient care. In the US, a federal rule was implemented to mandate Clinical notes to be shared with patients. 

In many circumstances, patients can’t even understand the doctor’s notes, and by reading them, patients get nervous and anxious and put themselves at risk trying to figure out what to do. AI could help to convert complex medical terminology to layman terminology. But patients are still reluctant to trust AI and want explanations from human doctors.

Artificial intelligence also could help to improve the interpretation and diagnosis of medical images. How can AI be dangerous? Currently, physicians and healthcare practitioners spend a significant amount of time dealing with technology. It requires up to 50 computer clicks necessary to place a single treatment order for one patient.

It increases the time the physicians spend with the computer and decreases the time with the patients, which decreases patient satisfaction and increased physician burnout. 

AI systems may store sensitive patient data, which can be vulnerable to hacking or other security bridges. AI can be biased, resulting in patients being misdiagnosed, and receiving less effective, or even ineffective treatment advice.

Who will be responsible? Even the AI system that is used makes a mistake and inappropriate diagnosis and treatment advice. Who will be responsible if ChatGPT delivers information that is malpractice, and who will correct it? It is essential to carefully consider the risks and benefits of AI in healthcare to ensure that AI is used ethically and responsibly to protect our safety and privacy.

Stay tuned as we discuss more on AI breakthroughs in the healthcare industry.

Article written by: Azam Saghir

About the author

SA
Software And Technology

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Software & Technology Insights

Kyndryl report: AI is in 57% of enterprise core processes, but workforce readiness is falling behind

Kyndryl report: AI is in 57% of enterprise core processes, but workforce readiness is falling behind

Kyndryl's 2026 People Readiness Report highlights that 57% of enterprise core processes have integrated AI. Despite this advancement, only 23% of leaders believe their workforce is fully prepared for AI implementations. The report emphasizes the growing gap between AI adoption and workforce readiness.

  • 0157% of enterprise processes now involve AI.
  • 02Only 23% of leaders feel their workforce is fully AI-ready.
  • 03Workforce readiness is crucial for effective AI implementation.

Jul 11, 2026

Global e-commerce market on track to nearly double by 2035, driven by mobile, AI, and D2C shifts

Global e-commerce market on track to nearly double by 2035, driven by mobile, AI, and D2C shifts

A new forecast predicts that the global e-commerce market will reach $19.83 trillion by 2035. Key drivers include AI personalization, direct-to-consumer (D2C) platforms, and mobile-first checkout processes. These changes are expected to reshape enterprise operations significantly.

  • 01Global e-commerce is projected to reach $19.83 trillion by 2035.
  • 02Key growth drivers include AI, D2C, and mobile-first strategies.
  • 03These trends will significantly alter enterprise operations.

Jul 10, 2026

Shadow AI is outpacing enterprise governance, Smarsh study finds

Shadow AI is outpacing enterprise governance, Smarsh study finds

A Smarsh study reveals that only 26% of enterprises believe their AI governance matches the pace of AI deployment, while just 30% are capable of detecting shadow AI. This highlights the challenges companies face in managing AI in enterprise environments.

  • 01Only 26% of enterprises report adequate AI governance.
  • 02Just 30% of companies can detect shadow AI.
  • 03There's a growing gap between AI deployment and governance.

Jul 10, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

SA
Software And Technology