OEMs vs Third Party Providers: What’s the Difference?

Any business, large or small, has a data center and internal network. These networks require maintenance. Most companies hire service providers responsible for channel alliances, but in fact, there is another way…and it’s cheaper. Enter Reliant Technology.

Our guest today, Mike Steiner, Director of Technical Services with Reliant Technology, broke down this complex system with over 16 years of experience in manufacturing.

OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturer) have typically been the point of contact for provider partnerships. On today’s podcast we focused on the key differences between Reliant Technology, a third party provider, and OEMs, learning about client stories and case studies that explain why OEMs are not the only way.

Using a “hybrid maintenance strategy,” Steiner explained what sets Reliant Technology apart. He carefully explained the inverse relationship between OEMs and a third party approach.

“The more market share the brand has…the more parts there are on the open market,” he said, explaining how the price goes down as demand rises.

“Because we are a third party provider we have all the skill sets that you would expect for the data center work that we do,” Steiner said, explaining why Reliant Technology is fully capable of the task at hand. Additionally, Reliant Technology is a smaller organization, allowing for more flexibility and a personal feel and approach.

Steiner divulged where he sees the future of third party providers going, elaborating on why he believes there will be more adoption over time, and why people will be more open to building solutions out of used gear.

For the latest news, videos, and podcasts in the Software & Electronics Industry, be sure to subscribe to our industry publication.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!
Twitter – @TechMKSL
Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale
LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Image

Latest

care
Navigating the Denial Pipeline: How Medicare Advantage Plans Reshape Access to Care
December 2, 2025

Medicare Advantage was sold as a smarter, more efficient way to care for seniors, but too often the efficiency seems to land on the wrong side of the patient–provider relationship. When plans deny or delay needed services through opaque rules and weak oversight, beneficiaries feel it first—in missed therapies, postponed procedures, and a…

Read More
patient
Rebecca Interview: When Peer-to-Peer Reviews Stop Being About the Patient
December 2, 2025

Behind the sterile labels of “inpatient” versus “observation” care is a messy reality: clinicians and insurers often enter peer-to-peer reviews without a shared rulebook, turning what should be a clinical dialogue into a box-checking exercise. The speaker’s frustration points to a broader problem in U.S. healthcare utilization management—decisions about coverage can feel pre-decided,…

Read More
physician advisor
Navigating Payer Denials: A Physician Advisor’s Perspective #2
December 2, 2025

A physician advisor recently described a case that should unsettle anyone who cares about fair, clinically grounded coverage decisions: a Medicaid patient arrived comatose from an overdose, was emergently intubated, developed aspiration pneumonia, and stayed through three midnights before leaving against medical advice. By any bedside standard, this is acute, unstable care—exactly what…

Read More
Navigating Payer Denials: A Physician Advisor’s Perspective #1
December 2, 2025

America’s healthcare system is buckling under a contradiction we’ve normalized: we expect reliable care for roughly 380 million people while letting every major lever of the system be pulled by for-profit players chasing the same dollar. In any market, companies will optimize for profit, but in medicine that instinct collides with a rulebook…

Read More