Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesArchitecture & Design

On Deck with Circuit Check: When to Use a Universal Test Platform

DUTs, or devices under test, were the topic on the discussion board for On Deck with Circuit Check. One-to-one device testing can be a laborious time-escalating process, but there are some methods and strategies for testing multiple devices to improve output time. Sean Casey, test systems engineering manager with Circuit Check, and Ted Ronnenburg,…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Architecture & Design teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share
On Deck with Circuit Check: When to Use a Universal Test Platform

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Architecture & Design?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Architecture & Design coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

DUTs, or devices under test, were the topic on the discussion board for On Deck with Circuit Check. One-to-one device testing can be a laborious time-escalating process, but there are some methods and strategies for testing multiple devices to improve output time. Sean Casey, test systems engineering manager with Circuit Check, and Ted Ronnenburg, senior sales manager with MAC Panel Company, joined host Daniel Litwin for a deep dive on DUTs and when to use a universal test platform.

“For us, a core platform is usually the building block or foundation to create a dedicated or universal tester,” Casey said. “The core platform can consist of things like: a rack that’s standardized with a PDU and a monitor stand and all the ancillary things that go into creating test platforms, minus the mass interconnect and test equipment.” Casey added that having a core platform was a massive advantage for Circuit Check.

Dedicated test platforms only utilize the instrumentation needed for specific testing. This type of platform reduces the costs associated with mass interconnects involved with universal platforms. The downside? If a facility only has one dedicated tester and it goes down, the production line can go down, too.

There are many reasons for using one testing platform method over another, but flexibility is one of the most important factors when considering a universal tester. “If you’re deploying worldwide and you need to support this platform worldwide, and you’re going to have three testers in Asia, three in Mexico, and so forth, it’s much easier to support that type of thing with a universal tester,” Casey said.

The ultimate decision maker comes down to the testing requirements of the product. “When we work with Circuit Check, we try to determine what the requirements are from the system level, the IO, to suggest and provide the right interface solution to accommodate what’s going to be needed and supported in the best way,” Ronnenburg said.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Architecture & Design starts with a company putting its architects, designers, and spec writers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Specifiers choose partners whose work they have already seen explained, and your designers can be that explanation.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Architecture & Design Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Architecture & Design: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Architecture & Design buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Architecture & Design expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your architects, designers, and spec writers into the articles, video, and social content Architecture & Design buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Architecture & Design Insights

Architecture firms are importing lab-style foresight to future-proof practice, starting with 90-minute scenario reviews

Architecture firms are importing lab-style foresight to future-proof practice, starting with 90-minute scenario reviews

Architecture firms are adopting a foresight approach similar to labs by explicitly making assumptions and then stress-testing them. This method, showcased by AIA North Carolina, aims to future-proof architectural practices through regular scenario reviews. The goal is to enhance the resilience and adaptability of architectural designs.

  • 01Architectural firms are conducting 90-minute scenario reviews to stress-test their assumptions and improve resilience.
  • 02The operational shift focuses on making assumptions explicit and testing them like a research lab.
  • 03This approach is intended to future-proof architectural practices.

Aug 25, 2026

Architecture billings at 46.6 keep preconstruction demand weak, but a 52.6 inquiries index shows owners still shopping

Architecture billings at 46.6 keep preconstruction demand weak, but a 52.6 inquiries index shows owners still shopping

The Architecture Billings Index (ABI) for July stayed in contraction at 46.6, while design contracts were at 47.2, indicating a continued weak demand in preconstruction. However, the inquiries index was higher at 52.6, suggesting that owners are still exploring potential projects.

  • 01The Architecture Billings Index (ABI) for July was 46.6, indicating contraction in billings.
  • 02Design contracts for July were at 47.2, also signaling weak demand.
  • 03The inquiries index for July was 52.6, showing owners are still actively considering projects.

Aug 23, 2026

DLR Group’s McFarlane deal puts science and tech programming closer to the architect, and it will show up first in lab and data center schedules

DLR Group’s McFarlane deal puts science and tech programming closer to the architect, and it will show up first in lab and data center schedules

DLR Group's acquisition of McFarlane Architects aims to enhance their architectural delivery with integrated science and tech programming. The deal is expected to primarily impact scheduling in lab and data center projects. This integration will bring science and technology planning closer to the role of architects.

  • 01DLR Group has acquired McFarlane Architects to improve integration of lab and mission-critical planning within its architectural services.
  • 02This acquisition will first impact scheduling in lab and data center projects.
  • 03The deal underscores the importance of architecture firms expanding their expertise in science and technology programming.

Aug 22, 2026

Explore More Architecture & Design Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Architecture & Design.

Browse Architecture & Design Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Architecture & Design and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512