Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Rising Care Costs Drive Cloud-Based MedTech Adoption

The cost of U.S. healthcare, which is expected to rise over the next three years according to research from Willis Towers Watson, is pushing care providers to look strategic solutions that make care more efficient without sacrificing patient care outcomes. Cloud-based medtech appears to be gaining steam to help meet patient demand and insulate against…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

The cost of U.S. healthcare, which is expected to rise over the next three years according to research from Willis Towers Watson, is pushing care providers to look strategic solutions that make care more efficient without sacrificing patient care outcomes. Cloud-based medtech appears to be gaining steam to help meet patient demand and insulate against future-facing risks.

According to a new report from Research and Markets, the U.S. healthcare facilities management market is estimated to experience significant growth due to an increasing prevalence of chronic conditions, rising healthcare expenditure and the demand for modern and technologically advanced solutions.

Because of this, and because of the cost (and disruption to care) of deploying hardware solutions across an entire hospital system, care facilities are turning to cloud-based medtech solutions, especially ones that improve facility oversight. With an eye for solutions that “improve collaboration among teams and subsidiaries working in various remote locations, lower organizations’ operational costs,” this cloud-based medtech investment trend is giving the larger healthcare facility management vertical a profitable estimation over the next five years.

On top of this, healthcare providers are citing already-existent technologies needing more interoperability to meet regulatory pressure, patient demand pressure, and the challenges that come from cloud technology that is unsupportive of data exchange. This is further motivating the desire for top-notch cloud-based medtech for healthcare facility management.

Kevin Stevenson, frequent contributor, healthcare administration expert and host of MarketScale’s “I Don’t Care” podcast, breaks down his thoughts on this trend toward cloud-based medtech, specifically equipment tracking solutions, in healthcare facility management spend, pulling from his hospital’s operational strategies and what the industry can learn from this trend in practice.

Kevin’s Thoughts

“Just wanna share a little bit of information on my thoughts regarding cloud-based facility management solutions. And this is in regards to devices that are capable of tracking medical equipment in real time.

And so I know for my facility, we are starting to use tags on a wide variety of equipment because, certainly in hospitals, equipment gets misplaced. It gets taken to other departments, it might be put in a closet by someone who doesn’t know where it’s actually is supposed to be stored. And so with these devices, being able to just take a look on a screen and find those in real time would be tremendously helpful for all of our staff members. It saved them a lot of time in trying to locate the equipment. Oftentimes, if somebody can’t find a piece of equipment they put in a requisition to purchase it, and so that’s also wasteful as well.

Another aspect of this that I’m particularly excited about is we’re going to be tagging all of our wheelchairs. Wheelchairs are the same thing. They float in and out of various departments in the hospital. And we also oftentimes find them outside of the hospital when they’re used by patient’s family members to take them to their cars or wherever upon discharge.

So I’m really excited about this new technology and I think whenever you’re considering that, you need to consider just the amount of equipment that you have, and particularly paying attention to those pieces of equipment that you’ve had a lot of leakage or just any kind of loss regarding that.”

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are choosing alliances over mergers, per a July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July deals tracked by Becker's Hospital Review. St. Christopher's, Nemours, Jefferson and Temple signed a nonbinding alliance letter; Palomar UC San Diego Health launched July 1. Ownership stays put; governance, purchasing and outpatient investment absorb the change.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512