Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Should the COVID-19 Vaccine’s Intellectual Property Be Accessible for Everyone?

Key Words: Intellectual property protection is important because you have rogue scientists and organizations who might try and do a knock off of the vaccine that isn’t the same quality, which could be dangerous because it isn’t as effective. Pharmaceutical companies shouldn’t be making profit off of drugs that treat neglected diseases. Accessibility of…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Key Words:

  • Intellectual property protection is important because you have rogue scientists and organizations who might try and do a knock off of the vaccine that isn’t the same quality, which could be dangerous because it isn’t as effective.
  • Pharmaceutical companies shouldn’t be making profit off of drugs that treat neglected diseases.
  • Accessibility of the COVID-19 vaccine such as the inability to properly store the vaccine, is one of the biggest problems for certain parts of the world when it comes to vaccine distribution.

Commentary:

Although the COVID-19 vaccine is readily available, it isn’t necessarily available for everyone. Some countries across the globe do not have access to the vaccine partially because of intellectual property claims. Intellectual properties protect the patents of drugs like the COVID-19 vaccine, making it so that the information on how to make it, is only shared with a select group of people. Right now there is a battle over whether or not countries like the United States should share the IP of the COVID-19 vaccine. MarketScale reached out to Dr. Kishor Wasan about this topic and we asked his opinion on the World Trade Organization and TRIPS Council’s decision to lean so heavily on protecting IPs rather than what some may argue is looking out for the global good by making the COVID-19 vaccine more accessible.

Abridged Thoughts:

So intellectual property is partly there because yes, it’s there so they can make money and protect their invention. But at the same time, it’s also there so that, the product is protected, so that people don’t do rogue products and make a substandard version of it. That’s why this is actually a very controversial and tricky issue. It’s not that black and white. I mean, it’s not as simple as that. So you have to kind of keep those two things in mind. And again, it comes down to a balance between the two.

Medical Professionals Leave and Join the Industry in Droves. How Should This Shape Healthcare Education?

Is It Time to Revamp the Drug Development Pipeline?

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

Although the COVID 19 vaccine is here isn't necessarily available for everyone, some countries across the globe do not have access to the singular thing that could end the pandemic due in part because of intellectual properties. Right now, there's a battle over whether or not countries like the United States should share the IP of the vaccine. We reached out to Dr. Kishore wassan about this topic, and we asked, is the WTO and the trips council right for lean so heavily on protecting IPS rather than what some may argue is looking out for the global good? On one level, I think scientifically and medically, we all in a humanitarian effort believe try to make the vaccines accessible and cost effective. So that people in the world can definitely get the vaccine so they could be taken care of. I mean, it's that simple. However, the reason why intellectual property is a really tricky situation is because unfortunately, you have rogue rogue organizations, rogue scientists, rogue people out there that if they try to do a knock off on your vaccine and develop something that is substandard and based on, maybe you're, you know, off your intellectual property and then try to push that to the developing world. So a substandard vaccine for the developing world that could actually be dangerous because that vaccine may be more toxic and not as effective because it's done substandard. So intellectual property is partly there because yes, it's there so they can make money and protect their invention. But at the same time, it's also there so that, you know, the product is protected. So that people don't do do rogue products and make a substandard version of it. That's why this isn't actually a very controversial and tricky issue. It's not that black and white. I mean, it's not as simple as that. So you have to kind of keep those two things in mind. And again, it comes down to a balance between the two, ok? You know, it really is something that you have to unfortunately have to think about. Dr. Watson is the co-founder and co-director of the neglected global disease initiative at the University of British Columbia, which strives for global equity and accessibility. He is supporter of life saving drugs that aren't just a COVID 19 vaccine not being made for profit, but he believes ultimately the biggest challenge when it comes to certain parts of the globe is them not being able to actually store the vaccine once it's delivered to them. I have to wear my other hat for this, so I am the co-founder and co-director of the neglected global diseases initiative at the University of British Columbia, and global equity and accessibility is one of our mandates of need. UBC and in fact, we're going to hold a hold a conference at the end of November to talk about global equity. And so on. And within that. Yes your comments around trips and accessibility of the vaccine at or below cost for the developing world is one of the things that Nagai supports and believes in. In fact, we believe that for four drugs, for neglected diseases, it's not just for COVID. We believe that there should be drugs or other what we call neglected diseases for the developing world that should be developed at or below cost. You know, you know, there may be cost recovery because it costs money to make it, but we're not. Certainly we don't believe that they should be making profit in those parts of the world. That is definitely one of the issues around vaccine and vaccine development in the developing and the developing world. But one of the bigger issues before that is accessibility. Being able to get the vaccine, being able to store the vaccine, be able to have proper storage facilities in many parts of the world. They do not have proper refrigeration, so they cannot store the vaccines properly in there. Therefore, how can you get them to be accessible? So these are some of the definite issues that are on the table that the world needs to deal with. And yeah, Nagai UBC is certainly an advocate for that. As long as COVID 19 is still around a debate for the ipa, the vaccine will continue to rage on for the latest on the vaccine and the factors that go with this distribution. Be sure to head the market scale as well as subscribe.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

AAO-HNSF hearing loss guideline moves audiograms and amplification into primary care

AAO-HNSF’s new age-related hearing loss guideline calls for screening adults starting at age 50 and escalating to otoscopy, audiogram, and appropriately fit amplification. It shifts hearing loss from “patient complaint” to a routine primary-care workflow. The pressure shows up in audiology capacity, referral design, and documentation standards.

  • 01Screening at age 50 becomes a repeatable workflow, so capacity planning shifts from episodic ENT referrals to steady primary-care volume, especially where annual wellness visits are a dominant access point.
  • 02The guideline’s escalation sequence, screen, otoscopy, audiogram, amplification, then cochlear implant candidacy evaluation, creates a measurable funnel that health systems can instrument in the EHR and manage like any other pathway.
  • 03Asymmetric loss remains a separate trigger for MRI in many settings, and 2026 pre-proof work using NHANES and SEER highlights why imaging criteria choices can swing scan volume, a budgeting and radiology access issue, not a clinical footnote.

Sep 7, 2026

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

Accenture will keep supporting Australia’s My Health Record under a new three-year contract. ADHA is moving the platform to a multi-supplier operating model. The shift raises questions about shared integration discipline, tooling, and accountability when changes hit production.

  • 01Multi-supplier delivery is spreading across national-scale health platforms, as ADHA's My Health Record shift shows, moving risk from vendor selection to integration, runbooks, and accountability.
  • 02GenAI model upgrades are arriving with healthcare-specific claims, but the procurement work moves to evidence, safety controls, and monitoring once models sit inside clinical workflows.
  • 03Embedded AI expands the cyber asset inventory problem: if teams cannot discover the AI components across endpoints and devices, they cannot reliably secure or audit them.

Sep 7, 2026

Hospitals need a shortlist as cardiology AI clearances hit 225

Hospitals need a shortlist as cardiology AI clearances hit 225

Cardiology now has 225 FDA-cleared AI algorithms when imaging is included. That volume is the problem. Health systems now need tighter governance, integration checks, and clinical workflow evidence to decide what ships.

  • 01The useful benchmark for governance committees is scale: FDA-cleared AI totals 1,524 overall, with radiology at 1,163 and cardiology at 225 when CV imaging is included, according to Cardiovascular Business.
  • 02Procurement risk is shifting from “is it cleared?” to “where does it run?” because new clearances span cath lab guidance, echo quantification, remote monitoring, and image assessment tools that touch different systems of record.
  • 03AliveCor shows the long game: Healio reported 510(k) clearance for an ECG AI suite in 2020, and Cardiovascular Business listed a new clearance in 2026, a reminder to vet update cadence and post-clearance support.

Sep 7, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512