Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Should the COVID-19 Vaccine’s Intellectual Property Be Accessible for Everyone?

Key Words: Intellectual property protection is important because you have rogue scientists and organizations who might try and do a knock off of the vaccine that isn’t the same quality, which could be dangerous because it isn’t as effective. Pharmaceutical companies shouldn’t be making profit off of drugs that treat neglected diseases. Accessibility of…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Key Words:

  • Intellectual property protection is important because you have rogue scientists and organizations who might try and do a knock off of the vaccine that isn’t the same quality, which could be dangerous because it isn’t as effective.
  • Pharmaceutical companies shouldn’t be making profit off of drugs that treat neglected diseases.
  • Accessibility of the COVID-19 vaccine such as the inability to properly store the vaccine, is one of the biggest problems for certain parts of the world when it comes to vaccine distribution.

Commentary:

Although the COVID-19 vaccine is readily available, it isn’t necessarily available for everyone. Some countries across the globe do not have access to the vaccine partially because of intellectual property claims. Intellectual properties protect the patents of drugs like the COVID-19 vaccine, making it so that the information on how to make it, is only shared with a select group of people. Right now there is a battle over whether or not countries like the United States should share the IP of the COVID-19 vaccine. MarketScale reached out to Dr. Kishor Wasan about this topic and we asked his opinion on the World Trade Organization and TRIPS Council’s decision to lean so heavily on protecting IPs rather than what some may argue is looking out for the global good by making the COVID-19 vaccine more accessible.

Abridged Thoughts:

So intellectual property is partly there because yes, it’s there so they can make money and protect their invention. But at the same time, it’s also there so that, the product is protected, so that people don’t do rogue products and make a substandard version of it. That’s why this is actually a very controversial and tricky issue. It’s not that black and white. I mean, it’s not as simple as that. So you have to kind of keep those two things in mind. And again, it comes down to a balance between the two.

Medical Professionals Leave and Join the Industry in Droves. How Should This Shape Healthcare Education?

Is It Time to Revamp the Drug Development Pipeline?

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

Although the COVID 19 vaccine is here isn't necessarily available for everyone, some countries across the globe do not have access to the singular thing that could end the pandemic due in part because of intellectual properties. Right now, there's a battle over whether or not countries like the United States should share the IP of the vaccine. We reached out to Dr. Kishore wassan about this topic, and we asked, is the WTO and the trips council right for lean so heavily on protecting IPS rather than what some may argue is looking out for the global good? On one level, I think scientifically and medically, we all in a humanitarian effort believe try to make the vaccines accessible and cost effective. So that people in the world can definitely get the vaccine so they could be taken care of. I mean, it's that simple. However, the reason why intellectual property is a really tricky situation is because unfortunately, you have rogue rogue organizations, rogue scientists, rogue people out there that if they try to do a knock off on your vaccine and develop something that is substandard and based on, maybe you're, you know, off your intellectual property and then try to push that to the developing world. So a substandard vaccine for the developing world that could actually be dangerous because that vaccine may be more toxic and not as effective because it's done substandard. So intellectual property is partly there because yes, it's there so they can make money and protect their invention. But at the same time, it's also there so that, you know, the product is protected. So that people don't do do rogue products and make a substandard version of it. That's why this isn't actually a very controversial and tricky issue. It's not that black and white. I mean, it's not as simple as that. So you have to kind of keep those two things in mind. And again, it comes down to a balance between the two, ok? You know, it really is something that you have to unfortunately have to think about. Dr. Watson is the co-founder and co-director of the neglected global disease initiative at the University of British Columbia, which strives for global equity and accessibility. He is supporter of life saving drugs that aren't just a COVID 19 vaccine not being made for profit, but he believes ultimately the biggest challenge when it comes to certain parts of the globe is them not being able to actually store the vaccine once it's delivered to them. I have to wear my other hat for this, so I am the co-founder and co-director of the neglected global diseases initiative at the University of British Columbia, and global equity and accessibility is one of our mandates of need. UBC and in fact, we're going to hold a hold a conference at the end of November to talk about global equity. And so on. And within that. Yes your comments around trips and accessibility of the vaccine at or below cost for the developing world is one of the things that Nagai supports and believes in. In fact, we believe that for four drugs, for neglected diseases, it's not just for COVID. We believe that there should be drugs or other what we call neglected diseases for the developing world that should be developed at or below cost. You know, you know, there may be cost recovery because it costs money to make it, but we're not. Certainly we don't believe that they should be making profit in those parts of the world. That is definitely one of the issues around vaccine and vaccine development in the developing and the developing world. But one of the bigger issues before that is accessibility. Being able to get the vaccine, being able to store the vaccine, be able to have proper storage facilities in many parts of the world. They do not have proper refrigeration, so they cannot store the vaccines properly in there. Therefore, how can you get them to be accessible? So these are some of the definite issues that are on the table that the world needs to deal with. And yeah, Nagai UBC is certainly an advocate for that. As long as COVID 19 is still around a debate for the ipa, the vaccine will continue to rage on for the latest on the vaccine and the factors that go with this distribution. Be sure to head the market scale as well as subscribe.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

Direct-to-consumer telehealth raises spending, even as ASC investment surges

Direct-to-consumer telehealth raises spending, even as ASC investment surges

A Health Affairs analysis of commercial claims data (2011–13) found 12% of direct-to-consumer telehealth visits replaced visits to other providers and 88% represented new utilization, with net annual spending on acute respiratory illness increasing $45 per telehealth user. Separately, MobiHealthNews reported on August 31, 2026, via a HIMSSCast episode, that Erik Tellefson of Capital One said ambulatory surgery centers “represent one of the clearest growth structures in American healthcare.”

  • 01The most actionable benchmark for finance teams evaluating DTC telehealth is substitution rate, not visit growth. Health Affairs measured 12% substitution and 88% new utilization in commercial claims for acute respiratory illness.
  • 02The $45 per-user net annual spend increase in the Health Affairs analysis is small enough to hide in PMPM reporting but large enough to matter at scale, and it should be stress-tested against virtual-visit eligibility rules and repeat-use patterns.

Sep 2, 2026

HFMA’s new chair is a hospital CFO as Medicare reporting gets more detailed and revenue cycle work gets more technical

HFMA’s new chair is a hospital CFO as Medicare reporting gets more detailed and revenue cycle work gets more technical

HFMA named Corewell Health CFO Matthew E. Cox as its national chair effective June 1, 2026, while elevating revenue cycle and reimbursement leaders to its board, according to HFMA’s GlobeNewswire announcement. The association’s own coverage of CMS’s FY 2027 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule summary and new Medicare cost-reporting requirements such as Worksheet S-12 indicates a compliance workload that is increasingly data- and documentation-heavy for hospital finance and reporting teams. In parallel, HFMA’s certification catalog, including the Certified Hospital Cost Report Specialist (CHCRS) and Certified Specialist Payment & Reimbursement (CSPR), points to how health systems are professionalizing the skill sets needed to operationalize reimbursement policy changes. For operators, the practical consequence shows up in staffing models, audit readiness, and the data plumbing needed to produce defensible cost reports and faster revenue cycle decisions.

  • 01HFMA’s board slate now visibly includes roles that control the work: a system CFO (Corewell Health) and a chief revenue officer overseeing $7 billion in patient revenue at Orlando Health, per GlobeNewswire. That’s a signal that cost reporting and revenue cycle execution are board-level concerns, not back-office chores.
  • 02Medicare cost reporting is moving toward more granular worksheets and documentation, and each new CMS reporting requirement becomes a data-integration project before it becomes a policy memo, per HFMA’s reporting on Worksheet S-12 and its FY 2027 IPPS/LTCH PPS coverage.
  • 03HFMA’s CHCRS, CRCR, and CSPR credentials provide a concrete way to benchmark internal capability: if cost report preparation, managed care contract terms, and prior auth workflows live in different teams, credentialing can reveal where handoffs are breaking down.

Sep 2, 2026

FDA QMSR ties supplier contracts to inspection prep

FDA QMSR ties supplier contracts to inspection prep

FDA’s Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) took effect Feb. 2, 2026, incorporating ISO 13485:2016 into 21 CFR Part 820 and shifting inspections to a process-based model under Compliance Program 7382.850, according to MD+DI. That change is starting to show up outside the quality department: medical device OEMs are being pushed to spell out documentation, audit support, and change-control responsibilities in contract manufacturing agreements, as Medical Design and Outsourcing described. Two recent partnership moves, Ratio Therapeutics expanding radiopharmaceutical manufacturing with PharmaLogic in Idaho Falls and Menicon shifting U.S. Rose K manufacturing access to three partners after concluding a prior arrangement, illustrate how multi-party supply chains now need contract terms that map directly to integrated QMS evidence. The operational consequence is simple: under CP 7382.850, a complaint, supplier nonconformance, or process change can pull investigators across CAPA, risk management, purchasing, and design records in one thread, so contracts and quality records have to be built to travel together.

  • 01Under FDA CP 7382.850, inspection risk increasingly sits in the “handoffs” between complaint handling, CAPA, supplier controls, and the Risk Management File, so quality evidence has to be assembled end-to-end, not by department.
  • 02For OEMs outsourcing manufacturing, the most useful contract test in 2026 is whether each clause produces inspectable artifacts, who owns them, where they live, and how fast they can be produced during an audit.
  • 03Multi-partner manufacturing models, like Menicon’s three-partner Rose K availability and Ratio’s capacity expansion with PharmaLogic, raise the bar on configuration control, supplier risk classification, and change notification across sites.

Sep 2, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512