Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Should the COVID-19 Vaccine’s Intellectual Property Be Accessible for Everyone?

Key Words: Intellectual property protection is important because you have rogue scientists and organizations who might try and do a knock off of the vaccine that isn’t the same quality, which could be dangerous because it isn’t as effective. Pharmaceutical companies shouldn’t be making profit off of drugs that treat neglected diseases. Accessibility of…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Key Words:

  • Intellectual property protection is important because you have rogue scientists and organizations who might try and do a knock off of the vaccine that isn’t the same quality, which could be dangerous because it isn’t as effective.
  • Pharmaceutical companies shouldn’t be making profit off of drugs that treat neglected diseases.
  • Accessibility of the COVID-19 vaccine such as the inability to properly store the vaccine, is one of the biggest problems for certain parts of the world when it comes to vaccine distribution.

Commentary:

Although the COVID-19 vaccine is readily available, it isn’t necessarily available for everyone. Some countries across the globe do not have access to the vaccine partially because of intellectual property claims. Intellectual properties protect the patents of drugs like the COVID-19 vaccine, making it so that the information on how to make it, is only shared with a select group of people. Right now there is a battle over whether or not countries like the United States should share the IP of the COVID-19 vaccine. MarketScale reached out to Dr. Kishor Wasan about this topic and we asked his opinion on the World Trade Organization and TRIPS Council’s decision to lean so heavily on protecting IPs rather than what some may argue is looking out for the global good by making the COVID-19 vaccine more accessible.

Abridged Thoughts:

So intellectual property is partly there because yes, it’s there so they can make money and protect their invention. But at the same time, it’s also there so that, the product is protected, so that people don’t do rogue products and make a substandard version of it. That’s why this is actually a very controversial and tricky issue. It’s not that black and white. I mean, it’s not as simple as that. So you have to kind of keep those two things in mind. And again, it comes down to a balance between the two.

Medical Professionals Leave and Join the Industry in Droves. How Should This Shape Healthcare Education?

Is It Time to Revamp the Drug Development Pipeline?

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

Although the COVID 19 vaccine is here isn't necessarily available for everyone, some countries across the globe do not have access to the singular thing that could end the pandemic due in part because of intellectual properties. Right now, there's a battle over whether or not countries like the United States should share the IP of the vaccine. We reached out to Dr. Kishore wassan about this topic, and we asked, is the WTO and the trips council right for lean so heavily on protecting IPS rather than what some may argue is looking out for the global good? On one level, I think scientifically and medically, we all in a humanitarian effort believe try to make the vaccines accessible and cost effective. So that people in the world can definitely get the vaccine so they could be taken care of. I mean, it's that simple. However, the reason why intellectual property is a really tricky situation is because unfortunately, you have rogue rogue organizations, rogue scientists, rogue people out there that if they try to do a knock off on your vaccine and develop something that is substandard and based on, maybe you're, you know, off your intellectual property and then try to push that to the developing world. So a substandard vaccine for the developing world that could actually be dangerous because that vaccine may be more toxic and not as effective because it's done substandard. So intellectual property is partly there because yes, it's there so they can make money and protect their invention. But at the same time, it's also there so that, you know, the product is protected. So that people don't do do rogue products and make a substandard version of it. That's why this isn't actually a very controversial and tricky issue. It's not that black and white. I mean, it's not as simple as that. So you have to kind of keep those two things in mind. And again, it comes down to a balance between the two, ok? You know, it really is something that you have to unfortunately have to think about. Dr. Watson is the co-founder and co-director of the neglected global disease initiative at the University of British Columbia, which strives for global equity and accessibility. He is supporter of life saving drugs that aren't just a COVID 19 vaccine not being made for profit, but he believes ultimately the biggest challenge when it comes to certain parts of the globe is them not being able to actually store the vaccine once it's delivered to them. I have to wear my other hat for this, so I am the co-founder and co-director of the neglected global diseases initiative at the University of British Columbia, and global equity and accessibility is one of our mandates of need. UBC and in fact, we're going to hold a hold a conference at the end of November to talk about global equity. And so on. And within that. Yes your comments around trips and accessibility of the vaccine at or below cost for the developing world is one of the things that Nagai supports and believes in. In fact, we believe that for four drugs, for neglected diseases, it's not just for COVID. We believe that there should be drugs or other what we call neglected diseases for the developing world that should be developed at or below cost. You know, you know, there may be cost recovery because it costs money to make it, but we're not. Certainly we don't believe that they should be making profit in those parts of the world. That is definitely one of the issues around vaccine and vaccine development in the developing and the developing world. But one of the bigger issues before that is accessibility. Being able to get the vaccine, being able to store the vaccine, be able to have proper storage facilities in many parts of the world. They do not have proper refrigeration, so they cannot store the vaccines properly in there. Therefore, how can you get them to be accessible? So these are some of the definite issues that are on the table that the world needs to deal with. And yeah, Nagai UBC is certainly an advocate for that. As long as COVID 19 is still around a debate for the ipa, the vaccine will continue to rage on for the latest on the vaccine and the factors that go with this distribution. Be sure to head the market scale as well as subscribe.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Underpayments in healthcare revenue cycle operations lack the visibility of denied claims because they don't trigger alerts or queue workflows. Without dedicated ownership and line-level verification against contract terms, paid claims that fall short of their contractual amount pass through undetected.

  • 01Denial workflows activate on rejection events, but underpayments produce no event, leaving paid claims unverified by default.
  • 02The speaker says many provider groups lack line-level contract intelligence to check each paid line against the applicable terms.
  • 03Payment received and payment checked are separate tasks: one verifies acceptance, the other verifies correctness—and the second often has no assigned owner.

Nov 6, 2026

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero payment on a claim line isn't automatically an underpayment; contract terms, particularly packaging rules, determine whether zero is correct. Chasing unsupported findings damages credibility with payers and weakens the position of legitimate disputes, so revenue cycle teams must verify the full contract terms and effective dates before treating any payment difference as a finding.

  • 01When a contract packages add-ons into the primary procedure, the add-on line may legitimately show zero payment because it is folded into the primary procedure reimbursement.
  • 02Pursuing payment differences that lack contract support burns credibility with payers and can weaken the team’s position on later disputes, including valid ones.
  • 03Always verify the complete contract terms, fee schedules, carve-outs, amendments, and the specific version in effect on the date of service before treating a payment variance as a recoverable underpayment.

Nov 6, 2026

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

Practices can receive payment on closed, clean claims that still fall short of negotiated contract amounts because billing ends at coding, submission and posting, while no role owns checking whether payer payments match fee schedules. The speaker argues that contract-level payment review is a separate, complementary function that compares closed claims to contract terms and, run continuously, helps surface shortfalls in time to act within timely filing windows.

  • 01Correctly coded and billed healthcare claims can still result in underpayment.
  • 02Practices should review closed-claim payments against contract terms to spot underpayments.
  • 03Discrepancies in claim payments can persist despite adherence to billing protocols.

Nov 6, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512