Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Office Hours with Michael McCall: Knowing What the Customer Wants As Much As They Do

Welcome to Office Hours, where current issues facing hospitality professionals will be discussed and potential solutions pursued. My name is Michael McCall and I am the NAMA Endowed Professor of Hospitality Business at Michigan State University. My primary areas of expertise lie in customer loyalty and reward programs, but I am particularly interested in the wider consumer behavior landscape….

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Welcome to Office Hours, where current issues facing hospitality professionals will be discussed and potential solutions pursued. My name is Michael McCall and I am the NAMA Endowed Professor of Hospitality Business at Michigan State University.

My primary areas of expertise lie in customer loyalty and reward programs, but I am particularly interested in the wider consumer behavior landscape. Over the next few months I will be discussing issues that we are thinking about in the ever expanding field of Hospitality; these might include topics related to guest security, loyalty and revenue management and other areas related to consumer lifetime value. Notably, I will be commenting on those issues that are keeping hospitality executives up at night.

In our ongoing series of discussions, we have considered the history and current status of the customer loyalty landscape. While many programs can demonstrate some benefits and ROI, few programs are fully leveraging the value and opportunities that are available. As noted, the real value can be found in the relationship established between the firm and the customer.

That process begins with a better understanding of the customer as well as the kind of relationship both parties desire. Let’s consider some of the frequently heard phrases that attempt to characterize the strategic focus for customer relations.

These phrases can be found in the vision statements for many hospitality firms and usually involve some variation of customer relationship management (CRM), customer engagement (CE), and customer experience.

In this column, I want to touch upon what firms might do to enhance the success of these consumer-oriented emphases regardless of the label given to them.

As a beginning note to this brief discussion it is important to realize that each of the terms used above represent well-meaning attempts to reach out to the customer. Indeed, they are key strategic components for many of the most well known hospitality brands and serve as a corner piece in hospitality research and education. The real challenge begins when we take these ideas and attempt to implement them on a customer level, and of course, how do we measure the impact of these efforts.

The academic term “operationalize” essentially means to translate and in this case the question becomes one of anticipating customer needs and wants. This often expressed yet not always practiced mantra goes back to the classic call by Theodore Levitt in a Harvard Business Review article that urged firms to better understand their customers. We can begin with a simple and straightforward principle: Consumer behavior is goal-directed. That is, behavior is purposeful. It is incumbent upon the provider to understand what that goal might be.

For instance, some products that might fall into a special occasion category illustrate this point. Customers purchase high end pints of crafted ice cream to either celebrate a positive event or to raise their spirits from a negative mood.

The lesson here is that the purchase and consumption of a specialty ice cream is neither random nor spontaneous; it is purposeful. The goal then is to appeal to consumers on that emotional level. The same might be said for selecting restaurant brands or resort properties that offer a variety of experiential attributes; consumers are not simply selecting food and lodging but rather an experience. Consequently, the key to strategic engagement is to bring together the attributes that consumers seek and the benefits.

There are times however when understanding customer desires is not clear. That is, customers are not aware of their own desires and how a service or good might satisfy those needs. Malcolm Gladwell makes a wonderful case that the creation and subsequent success of chunky tomato sauce did not come about from a survey or focus group (https://www.ted.com/talks/malcolm_gladwell_on_spaghetti_sauce).

Rather, customers embraced a product that they had never experienced. The financial success of this “discovery” is estimated to be in excess of 600 million dollars.

To bring this together, customers are going to become more engaged when firms have a better understanding of precisely what customers desire and then deliver it. Difficulties in gaining this level of understanding can come about from a lack of accurate data as well as a customer’s inability to articulate those desires. Those firms that can leverage their customer database will have a distinct competitive advantage in peeling back the layers of consumer motivation.

In a series of future columns, we will discuss a variety of consumer principles that provide insights that firms can readily act upon. As always, I welcome your thoughts, comments and suggestions for future columns.

Make sure to follow along with Office Hours, a bi-weekly column by Michael McCall.

For the latest news, videos, and podcasts in the Hospitality Industry, be sure to subscribe to our industry publication.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @HospitalityMKSL

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

Direct-to-consumer telehealth raises spending, even as ASC investment surges

Direct-to-consumer telehealth raises spending, even as ASC investment surges

A Health Affairs analysis of commercial claims data (2011–13) found 12% of direct-to-consumer telehealth visits replaced visits to other providers and 88% represented new utilization, with net annual spending on acute respiratory illness increasing $45 per telehealth user. Separately, MobiHealthNews reported on August 31, 2026, via a HIMSSCast episode, that Erik Tellefson of Capital One said ambulatory surgery centers “represent one of the clearest growth structures in American healthcare.”

  • 01The most actionable benchmark for finance teams evaluating DTC telehealth is substitution rate, not visit growth. Health Affairs measured 12% substitution and 88% new utilization in commercial claims for acute respiratory illness.
  • 02The $45 per-user net annual spend increase in the Health Affairs analysis is small enough to hide in PMPM reporting but large enough to matter at scale, and it should be stress-tested against virtual-visit eligibility rules and repeat-use patterns.

Sep 2, 2026

HFMA’s new chair is a hospital CFO as Medicare reporting gets more detailed and revenue cycle work gets more technical

HFMA’s new chair is a hospital CFO as Medicare reporting gets more detailed and revenue cycle work gets more technical

HFMA named Corewell Health CFO Matthew E. Cox as its national chair effective June 1, 2026, while elevating revenue cycle and reimbursement leaders to its board, according to HFMA’s GlobeNewswire announcement. The association’s own coverage of CMS’s FY 2027 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule summary and new Medicare cost-reporting requirements such as Worksheet S-12 indicates a compliance workload that is increasingly data- and documentation-heavy for hospital finance and reporting teams. In parallel, HFMA’s certification catalog, including the Certified Hospital Cost Report Specialist (CHCRS) and Certified Specialist Payment & Reimbursement (CSPR), points to how health systems are professionalizing the skill sets needed to operationalize reimbursement policy changes. For operators, the practical consequence shows up in staffing models, audit readiness, and the data plumbing needed to produce defensible cost reports and faster revenue cycle decisions.

  • 01HFMA’s board slate now visibly includes roles that control the work: a system CFO (Corewell Health) and a chief revenue officer overseeing $7 billion in patient revenue at Orlando Health, per GlobeNewswire. That’s a signal that cost reporting and revenue cycle execution are board-level concerns, not back-office chores.
  • 02Medicare cost reporting is moving toward more granular worksheets and documentation, and each new CMS reporting requirement becomes a data-integration project before it becomes a policy memo, per HFMA’s reporting on Worksheet S-12 and its FY 2027 IPPS/LTCH PPS coverage.
  • 03HFMA’s CHCRS, CRCR, and CSPR credentials provide a concrete way to benchmark internal capability: if cost report preparation, managed care contract terms, and prior auth workflows live in different teams, credentialing can reveal where handoffs are breaking down.

Sep 2, 2026

FDA QMSR ties supplier contracts to inspection prep

FDA QMSR ties supplier contracts to inspection prep

FDA’s Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) took effect Feb. 2, 2026, incorporating ISO 13485:2016 into 21 CFR Part 820 and shifting inspections to a process-based model under Compliance Program 7382.850, according to MD+DI. That change is starting to show up outside the quality department: medical device OEMs are being pushed to spell out documentation, audit support, and change-control responsibilities in contract manufacturing agreements, as Medical Design and Outsourcing described. Two recent partnership moves, Ratio Therapeutics expanding radiopharmaceutical manufacturing with PharmaLogic in Idaho Falls and Menicon shifting U.S. Rose K manufacturing access to three partners after concluding a prior arrangement, illustrate how multi-party supply chains now need contract terms that map directly to integrated QMS evidence. The operational consequence is simple: under CP 7382.850, a complaint, supplier nonconformance, or process change can pull investigators across CAPA, risk management, purchasing, and design records in one thread, so contracts and quality records have to be built to travel together.

  • 01Under FDA CP 7382.850, inspection risk increasingly sits in the “handoffs” between complaint handling, CAPA, supplier controls, and the Risk Management File, so quality evidence has to be assembled end-to-end, not by department.
  • 02For OEMs outsourcing manufacturing, the most useful contract test in 2026 is whether each clause produces inspectable artifacts, who owns them, where they live, and how fast they can be produced during an audit.
  • 03Multi-partner manufacturing models, like Menicon’s three-partner Rose K availability and Ratio’s capacity expansion with PharmaLogic, raise the bar on configuration control, supplier risk classification, and change notification across sites.

Sep 2, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512