Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesIndustrial IoT

As Congress Seeks Feedback on IoT Adoption, IoT Experts Should Seek Opportunities for Cross-Discipline Collaboration

In August 2023, the National Institute of Standards of Technology (NIST) put out a request for comments on the Preliminary Update from the Internet of Things Federal Working Group (IoTFWG), which aims to provide the nation direction on how to improve IoT adoption and expand its use cases for the future of industrial, corporate,…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Industrial IoT teams put it to work with AI Visibility (GEO).

By Aryan Kaushik · · CybersecurityDr. Aryan KaushikFederal Working GroupIot
Share

Key takeaways

01

In August 2023, the National Institute of Standards of Technology (NIST) put out a request for comments on the Preliminary Update from the Internet of Things Federal Working Group (IoTFWG), which aims to provide the nation direction on how to improve IoT adoption and expand its use cases for the future of industrial, corporate,…

Free workspace

Turn your Industrial IoT expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

In August 2023, the National Institute of Standards of Technology (NIST) put out a request for comments on the Preliminary Update from the Internet of Things Federal Working Group (IoTFWG), which aims to provide the nation direction on how to improve IoT adoption and expand its use cases for the future of industrial, corporate, and residential productivity. The working group’s objectives encompass exploring how Federal agencies can benefit from IoT, strategies for increasing IoT adoption in key sectors, ensuring the secure use of IoT, especially for critical infrastructure, and enhancing the resilience of Federal systems against IoT-related cyber threats.

In its most recent update, the Working Group landed on a few key strategies, mostly involving public-private coordination, for speeding up and increasing the reach of IoT adoption. These methods include:

  • Government-based cooperative research and development
  • Federal technology’s transferability
  • Government-based outreach and engagement
  • Grants
  • Federal coordination with nongovernment entities

While the comments they are requesting are broad, it’ll be interesting to see if the general public and IoT industry experts agree with these strategic pillars for IoT adoption, and the industries the Working Group says are most likely to encourage this adoption, like healthcare, energy and the supply chain. IoT’s adoption in the U.S. has lagged behind other countries, specifically the UK which has committed to utilizing IoT methodologies to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050. So what is left to be done to close the gap between the U.S. and their counterparts?

Dr. Aryan Kaushik, Assistant Professor at the University of Sussex, believes that there are actionable steps the U.S. can take to reach its goals. These steps rely heavily on proper coordination of grants, engagement with all stakeholders, and tapping into existing frameworks.

Dr. Aryan Kaushik’s Thoughts

“Yes, this report is presented by the IoT Federal Working Group, signed by NIST, right, so it has presented quite well-aligned sort of goals and objectives to implement IoT for various applications. So basically some of the things that really kind of attracted me were IoT public safety, let’s say, so they had mentioned public safety sort of applications using IoT, right, then they had mentioned sustainability and resilience of the network and basically reliability of the network as well. So from a technical standpoint of view, it looks really well aligned with what is happening currently in the market, in technical markets, and in terms of the, you know, improvements in technology as well.”

IoT and the UK’s Environmental Strategy

“So if you talk about the UK, our main goal has actually been to provide net zero, right, so decarbonizing the emissions that we have. So we have a goal by 2050 to achieve the UK’s net zero target, right? So if you look at the report, the initial sort of prediction of IoT technology in the US, so it does cover some points about cost efficiency, it does cover some points about reliability and sustainability of the network, which again, you know, aligns very well with UK’s strategy as well. Then we also have one broadband rollout very recently, which is the government’s target to provide about 85% of the UK, maybe by 2025, to provide 85% of gigabit speeds, right? So if you talk about IoT sort of applications, that can also come to that, right.”

6G Framework and its Relation to IoT

“And then one more interesting thing was that this adoption of IoT approaches aligns very well with ITR approved 6G framework that we have. If you talk with telecommunication and industrial telecommunication personnel, this seems to be aligning quite well with what is happening at the moment, what we can actually implement, and what kind of applications we can have using IoT sort of technologies. So that would be my initial comment.”

Broad Scope and Maturity of IoT

“So again, the technology is not super mature yet. I think IoT is a very wide term, right? So if you have different networks, let’s say, if you include different non-Christian networks, that becomes your internet of, let’s say, airborne networks or internet of space things, right? So it’s a very wide term. It includes a lot of terms. It can provide us with an umbrella for a lot of terms. But I think it’s not really mature enough at the moment, but I think this is the direction. And then it looks like that the draft or the preliminary report looks quite right in the direction of the technical advancements.”

Challenges in Implementing IoT

“Yes, I think to implement all these technologies, as I just mentioned, they need a lot of coordination between different entities, right? So government needs to coordinate through grants with academics in the US, with collaborators, and with sort of industry stakeholders as well. So they need to coordinate quite well with the people around them.

And one thing is also the regulators, for example, as we know that spectrum is a bit of a congested issue, right? We have the spectrum that we allocate for different IoT applications is congested at the moment, which is, you know, the microwave spectrum that we talk about. So kind of reuse of the spectrum and kind of going through high-frequency sort of ranges or, you know, I’m just giving an example.

So let’s say you want to jump to millimeter wave sub-terahertz or terahertz sort of frequencies. So spectrum allocation will be decided by government bodies, right?

But then if you kind of have coordination with industry stakeholders about the spectrum reuse, about the spectrum sharing for different applications, because at the end of the day, they are the ones providing the technology, right, the IoT technology. So this coordination is of paramount importance between the government, the government entities, and the industry stakeholders. And again, you have to involve academics as well, because they are the ones coming up with these dreamy ideas, right, where they’re presenting a dream sort of thing. And, you know, I mean, with some assumptions and stuff. But at the end of the day, industry stakeholders are implementing them and making them into reality. Right.”

Future of IoT and Challenges

“So really, it requires a coordination between all these bodies and also through grants, as you mentioned as well, is a good step ahead to kind of have more grants given to the academic personals for, you know, kind of advancing the IoT technology. So these, I think from the draft, look really like the strong pillars. And they, again, look in the right direction from what I have read. So I think we have pretty much covered everything. But again, I would like to summarize what we have just mentioned. So, I mean, it looks great on paper. But I think there are many challenges and many less, a lot of limitations, hardware limitations to implement all these nice approaches that we see from our academic friends. So we really need to be concerned about the efficiency of these IoT solutions. So how cost-efficient they are.

Are they aligning very well with the net zero strategy of, let’s say, many Western, you know, kind of developed countries that we have? Are they aligning very well with gigabit sort of speeds? Right.

So when you are talking about connectivity, it has to be fast connectivity as well. Are they taking into account a lot of technical advancements? Right.

As you’re taking into account less and don’t trust the networks or integrated AI and communications, integrated sensing and communications, and so on. So are you really taking into account the new technologies to implement IoT solutions? And also, do we have coordination between different state regulators and the academia and industry sort of stakeholders?

Do we have the coordination to actually make these techniques feasible? So these are some of the key points that I would like to summarize out of a discussion that is very important when we talk about IoT technology being implemented at a large scale.”

Article written by Shanice Bennerson.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Industrial IoT starts with a company putting its controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Plant and controls buyers research deep before contact, and your engineers get to shape that research.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

Aryan Kaushik
Aryan KaushikAssistant Professor

Dr. Aryan Kaushik is Assistant Professor at University of Sussex, UK. He has been with University College London (UCL), UK, University of Edinburgh, UK, and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. He has held visiting appointments at Imperial College London, UK, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Athena RC, Greece, and Beihang University, China. He has been a panellist for the UKRI EPSRC Information and Communication Technologies Prioritisation Panel. His research interests are broadly in 6G, wireless communications, signal processing and AI.

B2B Weekly

The week in Industrial IoT, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Industrial IoT: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Industrial IoT buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Industrial IoT expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners into the articles, video, and social content Industrial IoT buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Industrial IoT Insights

Rugged computers grow 5.8% a year, slower than the industrial IoT around them

Rugged computers grow 5.8% a year, slower than the industrial IoT around them

IndexBox's new forecast puts rugged computers at $6.8 billion in 2026, growing 5.8% a year to $11.3 billion by 2035. Industrial IoT forecasts run faster. Their growth estimates range from 8.16% to 16.8% a year, which points field-device buyers toward connectivity, software and services as the faster-growing part of the spend.

  • 01Rugged computer forecasts of 5.4% and 5.8% trail the 8.16% to 16.8% projected for industrial IoT, pointing to faster growth in solutions and services than in devices.
  • 02Market-size estimates disagree far more than growth rates do: one firm's 2032 rugged forecast of $5.57 billion is below another's 2026 figure of $6.8 billion, so device budgets can benchmark growth rates and treat total size as background.
  • 03Connectivity, including 5G and satellite links, is moving onto the rugged spec sheet next to durability as demand shifts toward connected, real-time data capture in the field.

Oct 16, 2026

Case picking automation fails when nobody schedules the human

Case picking automation fails when nobody schedules the human

Vecna Robotics' CaseFlow system orchestrates both robots and human workers, emphasizing synchronized scheduling to address case picking inefficiencies. Zone-based dispatch prevents robot congestion, and Robotics 24/7 reported in October 2026 a two times throughput gain and up to 90% less worker travel at a GEODIS site.

  • 01Vecna reported a two times throughput gain and up to 90% less worker travel at a GEODIS deployment, Robotics 24/7 wrote in October 2026.
  • 02Vecna says on its site that CaseFlow reads demand from the WMS in real time, which is what turns a robot platform into a case picking workflow.
  • 03Prime Robotics says on its own site that goods-to-person lifts productivity up to six times; Vecna says on its site it delivers two times or more with no fixed infrastructure and deployment in four weeks or less.

Oct 15, 2026

A3's final mobile robot safety standard is written for the sites running the robots

A3's final mobile robot safety standard is written for the sites running the robots

ANSI/A3 R15.08-3-2026 is now available from A3. It completes the three-part R15.08 series for industrial mobile robot (IMR) safety. Part 3 is written for the sites that run the robots. It covers risk assessment, management of change, employee training and periodic reviews and inspections, so safety work continues in day-to-day operation after deployment.

  • 01The robot maker documents the environment a mobile robot was built for, and Part 3 makes the operating site responsible for managing changes to the environment the robot actually works in.
  • 02Part 1 was reaffirmed in 2026 with no technical changes, while Part 3 spells out what users must do to operate IMR applications safely.
  • 03Sites running fixed cells and mobile robots may use one safety program, because R15.08-3 was written alongside R15.06 Part 3.

Oct 11, 2026

Explore More Industrial IoT Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Industrial IoT.

Browse Industrial IoT Hub

About the Expert

Aryan Kaushik
Aryan Kaushik

Assistant Professor

Dr. Aryan Kaushik is Assistant Professor at University of Sussex, UK. He has been with University College London (UCL), UK, University of Edinburgh, UK, and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. He has held visiting appointments at Imperial College London, UK, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Athena RC, Greece, and Beihang University, China. He has been a panellist for the UKRI EPSRC Information and Communication Technologies Prioritisation Panel. His research interests are broadly in 6G, wireless communications, signal processing and AI.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Industrial IoT and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512