Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesSoftware & Technology

Can the U.S. Shore Up its National Cybersecurity Defenses?

In an era where cyber threats loom larger and more sophisticated, the urgency to bolster national cybersecurity defenses has never been more critical. With government watchdogs highlighting gaps in performance measures and cost assessments, and recent breaches underscoring vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, the stakes are high. How can the U.S. align its cybersecurity strategies…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Software & Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Daniel Litwin · Cybersecurity StrategiesDaniel LitwinDr. Jude EjiobiExperts Talk
Share

Key takeaways

01

In an era where cyber threats loom larger and more sophisticated, the urgency to bolster national cybersecurity defenses has never been more critical.

02

With government watchdogs highlighting gaps in performance measures and cost assessments, and recent breaches underscoring vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, the stakes are high.

03

align its cybersecurity strategies…

In an era where cyber threats loom larger and more sophisticated, the urgency to bolster national cybersecurity defenses has never been more critical. With government watchdogs highlighting gaps in performance measures and cost assessments, and recent breaches underscoring vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, the stakes are high. How can the U.S. align its cybersecurity strategies across various stakeholders to effectively counter the evolving threat landscape?

Experts Talk, hosted by Daniel Litwin, the Voice of B2B at MarketScale, dives into this pressing issue with a panel of seasoned professionals: Stevan Bernard, Dr. Jude Ejiobi, John Petrozzelli, and Krista Macomber. The episode explores the readiness of the U.S. national cybersecurity ecosystem to align strategies to strengthen cybersecurity defenses.

  1. Gap in Performance Measures and Costs: The discussion highlights the lack of outcome-oriented performance measures and detailed cost assessments in current national cybersecurity strategies.
  2. Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: The panelists discuss how digitalization, cloud computing, and Industry 4.0 are expanding the cybersecurity attack surface.
  3. Strategies for Improvement: The conversation covers the need for national metrics, the importance of regulatory oversight, and the role of frameworks like NIST and Zero Trust in setting cybersecurity standards.

About the Guests:

Stevan Bernard is a Global Protection Professional and Cybersecurity Educator with BG LLC, known for his extensive experience in protecting corporate assets worldwide.

Dr. Jude Ejiobi is a Cybersecurity Researcher and MSM Program Director at the University of Houston Downtown, with a focus on developing effective cybersecurity metrics.

John Petrozzelli serves as the Director at MassCyberCenter, specializing in securing assets, combating ransomware, and providing strategic security guidance on enterprise-wide projects.

Krista Macomber is a Research Director at The Futurum Group, specializing in data security, protection, and management strategies, particularly within multi-cloud environments.

Article written by MarketScale.

About the author

Daniel Litwin
Daniel LitwinEditor, B2B Media, MarketScale

Daniel Litwin is a journalist of multiple disciplines focused on finding and telling engaging stories for B2B communities. He has interviewed executives from Fortune 500 companies including Honeywell, Microsoft, John Deere, and Chipotle, and leads editorial direction at MarketScale. Litwin hosts weekly shows and podcasts while helping develop new content approaches across the MarketScale platform. He holds a B.J. in Radio/Television Reporting/Anchoring and a B.A. in Spanish from the University of Missouri-Columbia.

Software & Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Software & Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Software & Technology Insights

Google Restricted Meta's Access to Gemini Compute. The AI Infrastructure Bottleneck Is Now Visible.

Google Restricted Meta's Access to Gemini Compute. The AI Infrastructure Bottleneck Is Now Visible.

Google informed Meta in March 2026 that it could not provide the requested Gemini compute capacity. This restriction impacted several of Meta's internal AI projects, leading to a need for rationing compute resources. Google is currently leasing $920 million a month in Nvidia GPUs from SpaceX to address its own shortage.

  • 01Google restricted Meta's access to Gemini compute capacity in 2026.
  • 02Meta had to ration compute tokens affecting its AI projects.
  • 03Google is leasing Nvidia GPUs from SpaceX to meet its needs.

Jul 15, 2026

Only 26% of enterprises have operationalized AI at scale, FPT-Forrester study finds

Only 26% of enterprises have operationalized AI at scale, FPT-Forrester study finds

A study by Forrester Consulting, commissioned by FPT, surveyed 397 global decision-makers and found that only 26% of enterprises have operationalized AI at scale. Despite significant AI investments, many companies struggle to deploy AI across their organizations. The gaps between AI investment and its implementation highlight challenges in scaling AI efforts globally.

  • 01Only 26% of enterprises have operationalized AI at scale.
  • 02There is a significant gap between AI investment and deployment.
  • 03Global enterprises face challenges in scaling AI efforts.

Jul 15, 2026

Only 11% of S&P 500 firms have deeply integrated AI, MIT study finds

Only 11% of S&P 500 firms have deeply integrated AI, MIT study finds

An MIT FutureTech study found that only 11% of S&P 500 companies have deeply integrated AI into their operations. Despite the low percentage, this represents a quadrupling of integration since 2022. The research tracked AI adoption trends from 2016 to 2025.

  • 01Only 11% of S&P 500 firms have deeply integrated AI.
  • 02AI integration in S&P 500 firms has quadrupled since 2022.
  • 03The study tracks AI adoption from 2016 to 2025.

Jul 15, 2026

Explore More Software & Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Software & Technology.

Browse Software & Technology Hub

About the Expert

Daniel Litwin
Daniel Litwin

Editor, B2B Media

MarketScale

Daniel Litwin is a journalist of multiple disciplines focused on finding and telling engaging stories for B2B communities. He has interviewed executives from Fortune 500 companies including Honeywell, Microsoft, John Deere, and Chipotle, and leads editorial direction at MarketScale. Litwin hosts weekly shows and podcasts while helping develop new content approaches across the MarketScale platform. He holds a B.J. in Radio/Television Reporting/Anchoring and a B.A. in Spanish from the University of Missouri-Columbia.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Software & Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512