Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

Though College Athletes Might Get More Creative Input in Independent NIL Deals, They Should Still Indulge in University-Licensed Deals

College athletes gain greater creative freedom through independent NIL deals, but university-licensed partnerships provide structural stability, institutional reach, and brand credibility that independent arrangements often lack. A balanced approach to NIL strategy can maximize both personal expression and commercial opportunity for student athletes. The article encourages athletes to view university partnerships as complementary rather than restrictive.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Brittney Whiteside · · Altius Sports PartnersBrittney WhitesideCollege AthletesCollege Sports
Share

Key takeaways

01

Independent NIL deals offer athletes more creative control over their personal brand messaging.

02

University-licensed deals provide broader audience reach, institutional support, and more reliable revenue streams.

03

A hybrid NIL strategy — blending independent and university partnerships — is likely the most effective approach for most college athletes.

Free workspace

Turn your Education Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

As student athletes gain increasing rights over their names, images, and likenesses (NIL), they’re offered a golden ticket to mold and profit from their personal brands. Which NIL deals are the most fruitful and make the most strategic sense for athletes, though: co-branded deals, or independent deals?

Co-branded NIL deals continue to gain traction as student athletes maneuver the various opportunities offered by NIL. The NIL Store powered by Campus Ink, for example, recently expanded its reach and unveiled the Marquette NIL Store as a dedicated platform for fans to back their beloved Marquette athletes, with a large portion of sales directly benefiting the players. This exclusive store, officially licensed by Marquette University, showcases merchandise from over 150 athletes spanning 12 sports.

Co-branding, where an athlete’s personal brand intertwines with their university’s emblem, offers a fresh route for monetization, blending individual flair with institutional strength. Independent NIL deals, though, often between a player and a third-party brand, maximize a player's opportunity for ongoing development and expansion for their personal brand beyond their time at their alma mater.

While some athletes might leap at co-branding, others may seek more creative autonomy. As the NIL landscape unfurls, one thing is certain: opportunities are available for those ready to seize them. Does one strategy always make more sense than another? Brittney Whiteside, Vice President of Collegiate Partnerships at Altius Sports Partners, is an expert in all things college athletics and college sports partnerships, working previously as Deputy Athletics Director at the University of Virginia, Senior Associate Athletics Director at Appalachian State University, and Director of External Engagement at the University of Missouri.

Brittney’s Thoughts on University-Licensed vs. Independent NIL Deals

“When you look at the NIL ecosystem as a whole, right? And when you look at, we talked about Marquette Athletics and our general manager there, that is an opportunity that’s available to all student athletes. So when you’re looking at that as a whole, that’s a great opportunity for the entire athletics department, all the athletes, to be able to engage in the space.

Now, individually, you know, athletes will need to look at their individual brand and really determine, like, what the best opportunity is for them to be able to engage in that space. So, you know, I think that’s a great opportunity to really determine, like, what the best opportunities are for them. And sometimes you may have an athlete that has a very high profile, a following where, you know, it may also have representation that may, you know, advise them differently.

But I do think that it’s really important for athletes to engage in this space if the opportunity is available, if they want too as well. And I think it’s all part of building their personal brand. And I think some athletes want to have a little bit more control over what that looks like and some of the products that are available.

So, you will see some athletes that want more creative control, maybe hesitate to be in this space. But I do think that it does provide opportunities for athletes to really be able to grow their personal brand and the merchandises is a big part of that.”

I do think that it does provide opportunities for athletes to really be able to grow their personal brand and the merchandises is a big part of that.
— Brittney Whiteside, Vice President of Collegiate Partnerships at Altius Sports Partners

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

BW
Brittney Whiteside
B2B Weekly

The week in Education Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Education Technology Insights

EdTech deals rose 11% while the median funding round shrank 31%

EdTech deals rose 11% while the median funding round shrank 31%

EdTech deals rose 11% over the past year, while the median round shrank 31% and Series A rounds got scarcer. First financings nearly doubled. District and corporate learning buyers now face more seed-funded vendors, just as procurement asks for proof that students use the product and learn from it.

  • 01EdTech now has 37 first financings where it had 19, and a thinner Series A pipeline behind them: more products are starting, and fewer are getting the money to grow up.
  • 02For buyers, a vendor's funding stage is now a working input to due diligence, alongside the evidence file: a seed-funded tool may be excellent and still lack the capital to build integrations and support for a whole district.
  • 03In a two-year trial in 18 Tennessee middle schools, 96% of students tried the Khanmigo AI tutor, yet the median student messaged it on only a third of practice days. Usage logs are a sharper test of AI tutoring than access counts.

Nov 14, 2026

AI training and clear policies went with teacher confidence but not cheating worries, CWU survey finds

AI training and clear policies went with teacher confidence but not cheating worries, CWU survey finds

A Central Washington University survey of 222 high school math and English teachers found clear AI policies and useful training went with higher teacher confidence. Neither showed a link to morale or cheating worries. Districts should judge AI training by confidence and classroom practice, and handle integrity through assignment and tool design.

  • 01In this survey, clear AI policy and useful training went with higher teacher confidence and had no measurable link to morale or cheating worries. To address integrity concerns, the authors suggest focusing on how assignments and assessments are designed, alongside discipline-specific guidance.
  • 02English teachers reported the most integrity worry (83.7%) and also the most confidence teaching responsible AI use (45.5%). Subject may shape AI attitudes more than readiness does, which makes one AI course for every department a weak plan.

Nov 14, 2026

Kazakhstan’s Coursera award: 163,098 recognized university credits

Kazakhstan’s Coursera award: 163,098 recognized university credits

Kazakhstan's Ministry of Science and Higher Education won Coursera's Learning Excellence Award 2026 for building online courses into university programs. Since 2022, Kazakh universities have recognized 163,098 academic credits from Coursera coursework. Credits show what institutions accepted, not just what was bought.

  • 01Kazakh universities have recognized 163,098 academic credits for Coursera coursework since 2022, a harder-to-get benchmark of online learning being accepted into formal academic records.
  • 02A license count shows what was bought; a credit count shows what universities accepted onto a student record. Recognized credits capture a harder step than seats, hours or certificates.
  • 03The Kazakh model transfers most directly where the buyer of seats and the body that grants credit are closely tied; corporate learning teams need their own equivalent of a recognized credit, such as a role requirement or a training record.

Nov 13, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

About the Expert

BW
Brittney Whiteside

Senior Manager at EY

Brittney Whiteside is a senior manager at EY with expertise spanning sports business, NIL (name, image, and likeness), and collegiate athletics. She has written and spoken on the evolving landscape of athlete commercialization and the intersection of education and sports. Her work addresses strategic considerations for student athletes navigating the modern NIL environment.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512