Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

Though College Athletes Might Get More Creative Input in Independent NIL Deals, They Should Still Indulge in University-Licensed Deals

College athletes gain greater creative freedom through independent NIL deals, but university-licensed partnerships provide structural stability, institutional reach, and brand credibility that independent arrangements often lack. A balanced approach to NIL strategy can maximize both personal expression and commercial opportunity for student athletes. The article encourages athletes to view university partnerships as complementary rather than restrictive.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Brittney Whiteside · Altius Sports PartnersBrittney WhitesideCollege AthletesCollege Sports
Share

Key takeaways

01

Independent NIL deals offer athletes more creative control over their personal brand messaging.

02

University-licensed deals provide broader audience reach, institutional support, and more reliable revenue streams.

03

A hybrid NIL strategy — blending independent and university partnerships — is likely the most effective approach for most college athletes.

Get featured

Want MarketScale to feature Education Technology?

Book a 15-minute demo and we'll map your Education Technology expertise to the content buyers are searching for.

Book a demo

As student athletes gain increasing rights over their names, images, and likenesses (NIL), they’re offered a golden ticket to mold and profit from their personal brands. Which NIL deals are the most fruitful and make the most strategic sense for athletes, though: co-branded deals, or independent deals?

Co-branded NIL deals continue to gain traction as student athletes maneuver the various opportunities offered by NIL. The NIL Store powered by Campus Ink, for example, recently expanded its reach and unveiled the Marquette NIL Store as a dedicated platform for fans to back their beloved Marquette athletes, with a large portion of sales directly benefiting the players. This exclusive store, officially licensed by Marquette University, showcases merchandise from over 150 athletes spanning 12 sports.

Co-branding, where an athlete’s personal brand intertwines with their university’s emblem, offers a fresh route for monetization, blending individual flair with institutional strength. Independent NIL deals, though, often between a player and a third-party brand, maximize a player's opportunity for ongoing development and expansion for their personal brand beyond their time at their alma mater.

While some athletes might leap at co-branding, others may seek more creative autonomy. As the NIL landscape unfurls, one thing is certain: opportunities are available for those ready to seize them. Does one strategy always make more sense than another? Brittney Whiteside, Vice President of Collegiate Partnerships at Altius Sports Partners, is an expert in all things college athletics and college sports partnerships, working previously as Deputy Athletics Director at the University of Virginia, Senior Associate Athletics Director at Appalachian State University, and Director of External Engagement at the University of Missouri.

Brittney’s Thoughts on University-Licensed vs. Independent NIL Deals

“When you look at the NIL ecosystem as a whole, right? And when you look at, we talked about Marquette Athletics and our general manager there, that is an opportunity that’s available to all student athletes. So when you’re looking at that as a whole, that’s a great opportunity for the entire athletics department, all the athletes, to be able to engage in the space.

Now, individually, you know, athletes will need to look at their individual brand and really determine, like, what the best opportunity is for them to be able to engage in that space. So, you know, I think that’s a great opportunity to really determine, like, what the best opportunities are for them. And sometimes you may have an athlete that has a very high profile, a following where, you know, it may also have representation that may, you know, advise them differently.

But I do think that it’s really important for athletes to engage in this space if the opportunity is available, if they want too as well. And I think it’s all part of building their personal brand. And I think some athletes want to have a little bit more control over what that looks like and some of the products that are available.

So, you will see some athletes that want more creative control, maybe hesitate to be in this space. But I do think that it does provide opportunities for athletes to really be able to grow their personal brand and the merchandises is a big part of that.”

I do think that it does provide opportunities for athletes to really be able to grow their personal brand and the merchandises is a big part of that.
— Brittney Whiteside, Vice President of Collegiate Partnerships at Altius Sports Partners

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

BW
Brittney Whiteside

Follow Education Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

The U.S. Department of Education’s edtech guidance turns “evidence” into a procurement requirement, even without new federal rules

The U.S. Department of Education’s edtech guidance turns “evidence” into a procurement requirement, even without new federal rules

The U.S. Department of Education has released a Dear Colleague letter that changes the criteria for districts when purchasing educational technology. The focus is now on demonstrating outcomes, evidence, and proof of implementation rather than just usage metrics like log-ins. This guidance emphasizes the importance of results and efficiency in edtech procurement.

  • 01Educational technology procurement requires proof of outcomes and efficiency.
  • 02Districts must provide evidence and proof of implementation when purchasing edtech.
  • 03Usage metrics like log-ins are no longer sufficient for edtech procurement justification.

Aug 23, 2026

Student success programs are colliding with student portals, and colleges are starting to run both like one system

Student success programs are colliding with student portals, and colleges are starting to run both like one system

Colleges are integrating student success programs with student portals to streamline their operations. The new SDX maturity model provides a framework for enhancing these digital journeys. Campus-level expansions are crucial for effective support program implementation.

  • 01Colleges are merging student success programs with student portals to create a unified system.
  • 02The SDX maturity model is a tool to improve digital journey management in education.
  • 03Campus-level expansions are essential for the successful implementation of support programs.

Aug 23, 2026

Johns Hopkins is staffing a 24-FTE success coaching program as data-driven advising shifts from pilot to operating model

Johns Hopkins is staffing a 24-FTE success coaching program as data-driven advising shifts from pilot to operating model

Johns Hopkins University is expanding its student success program by implementing a 24-FTE success coaching model. This initiative combines dedicated coaching structures with integrated data systems and automated outreach to enhance student advising. The program marks a transition from a pilot phase to a fully operational model aimed at improving student outcomes.

  • 01Johns Hopkins University is launching a 24-FTE success coaching program to industrialize student success.
  • 02The program integrates data systems and automated outreach with structured coaching to improve student advising.
  • 03This initiative transitions from a pilot project to a full operational model, enhancing student outcomes.

Aug 23, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

About the Expert

BW
Brittney Whiteside

Senior Manager at EY

Brittney Whiteside is a senior manager at EY with expertise spanning sports business, NIL (name, image, and likeness), and collegiate athletics. She has written and spoken on the evolving landscape of athlete commercialization and the intersection of education and sports. Her work addresses strategic considerations for student athletes navigating the modern NIL environment.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512