Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Education Technology

Though College Athletes Might Get More Creative Input in Independent NIL Deals, They Should Still Indulge in University-Licensed Deals

College athletes gain greater creative freedom through independent NIL deals, but university-licensed partnerships provide structural stability, institutional reach, and brand credibility that independent arrangements often lack. A balanced approach to NIL strategy can maximize both personal expression and commercial opportunity for student athletes. The article encourages athletes to view university partnerships as complementary rather than restrictive.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Brittney Whiteside · Altius Sports PartnersBrittney WhitesideCollege AthletesCollege Sports
Share

Key takeaways

01

Independent NIL deals offer athletes more creative control over their personal brand messaging.

02

University-licensed deals provide broader audience reach, institutional support, and more reliable revenue streams.

03

A hybrid NIL strategy — blending independent and university partnerships — is likely the most effective approach for most college athletes.

As student athletes gain increasing rights over their names, images, and likenesses (NIL), they’re offered a golden ticket to mold and profit from their personal brands. Which NIL deals are the most fruitful and make the most strategic sense for athletes, though: co-branded deals, or independent deals?

Co-branded NIL deals continue to gain traction as student athletes maneuver the various opportunities offered by NIL. The NIL Store powered by Campus Ink, for example, recently expanded its reach and unveiled the Marquette NIL Store as a dedicated platform for fans to back their beloved Marquette athletes, with a large portion of sales directly benefiting the players. This exclusive store, officially licensed by Marquette University, showcases merchandise from over 150 athletes spanning 12 sports.

Co-branding, where an athlete’s personal brand intertwines with their university’s emblem, offers a fresh route for monetization, blending individual flair with institutional strength. Independent NIL deals, though, often between a player and a third-party brand, maximize a player's opportunity for ongoing development and expansion for their personal brand beyond their time at their alma mater.

While some athletes might leap at co-branding, others may seek more creative autonomy. As the NIL landscape unfurls, one thing is certain: opportunities are available for those ready to seize them. Does one strategy always make more sense than another? Brittney Whiteside, Vice President of Collegiate Partnerships at Altius Sports Partners, is an expert in all things college athletics and college sports partnerships, working previously as Deputy Athletics Director at the University of Virginia, Senior Associate Athletics Director at Appalachian State University, and Director of External Engagement at the University of Missouri.

Brittney’s Thoughts on University-Licensed vs. Independent NIL Deals

“When you look at the NIL ecosystem as a whole, right? And when you look at, we talked about Marquette Athletics and our general manager there, that is an opportunity that’s available to all student athletes. So when you’re looking at that as a whole, that’s a great opportunity for the entire athletics department, all the athletes, to be able to engage in the space.

Now, individually, you know, athletes will need to look at their individual brand and really determine, like, what the best opportunity is for them to be able to engage in that space. So, you know, I think that’s a great opportunity to really determine, like, what the best opportunities are for them. And sometimes you may have an athlete that has a very high profile, a following where, you know, it may also have representation that may, you know, advise them differently.

But I do think that it’s really important for athletes to engage in this space if the opportunity is available, if they want too as well. And I think it’s all part of building their personal brand. And I think some athletes want to have a little bit more control over what that looks like and some of the products that are available.

So, you will see some athletes that want more creative control, maybe hesitate to be in this space. But I do think that it does provide opportunities for athletes to really be able to grow their personal brand and the merchandises is a big part of that.”

I do think that it does provide opportunities for athletes to really be able to grow their personal brand and the merchandises is a big part of that.
— Brittney Whiteside, Vice President of Collegiate Partnerships at Altius Sports Partners

About the author

BW
Brittney Whiteside

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Education Technology companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

Higher Ed's Seed Round: How Universities Decide Which Programs to Build

Higher Ed's Seed Round: How Universities Decide Which Programs to Build

The decision-making process for universities when choosing which online programs to develop and fund involves strategic considerations. These decisions are influenced by factors such as demand, resources, and institutional goals. Administrators need to weigh these elements to ensure successful and sustainable online education offerings.

  • 01Universities consider demand and resources in online program planning.
  • 02Institutional goals influence the choice of programs to fund.
  • 03Strategic decision-making is crucial for successful online education.

Jun 30, 2026

Teacher Stress Is Still at Crisis Levels in 2026. EdTech Vendors Selling Into Schools Need to Understand Why That Matters.

Teacher Stress Is Still at Crisis Levels in 2026. EdTech Vendors Selling Into Schools Need to Understand Why That Matters.

In 2026, more than half of US teachers continue to face significant job-related stress. This ongoing issue poses a primary adoption barrier for EdTech vendors and enterprise L&D teams targeting school districts. Understanding and addressing teacher stress is crucial for the successful implementation of educational technology.

  • 01Over half of US teachers experience high stress levels in 2026.
  • 02Teacher stress is a major barrier for EdTech adoption.
  • 03EdTech solutions must address stress to succeed in schools.

Jun 29, 2026

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

Raptor Technologies has transitioned from visitor management to enhancing student well-being with its StudentSafe platform. This move addresses school district needs for improved behavioral threat assessment. StudentSafe is designed to bolster educational security and student safety.

  • 01Raptor Technologies is expanding into student well-being.
  • 02The StudentSafe platform focuses on behavioral threat assessment.
  • 03StudentSafe responds to demands from school district customers.

Jun 26, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

About the Expert

BW
Brittney Whiteside

Senior Manager at EY

Brittney Whiteside is a senior manager at EY with expertise spanning sports business, NIL (name, image, and likeness), and collegiate athletics. She has written and spoken on the evolving landscape of athlete commercialization and the intersection of education and sports. Her work addresses strategic considerations for student athletes navigating the modern NIL environment.