Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

AI Disruption in Education Isn’t About AI. It’s About The Business Models AI Enables.

The recent plunge in Chegg’s valuation highlights the potential for AI disruption in education and edtech, raising questions about the future of the edtech sector’s competitive edge and solutions. Chegg Inc. is facing a potential loss of nearly $1 billion in market valuation as ChatGPT’s popularity grows, leading to a 47% drop in the…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Education Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

The recent plunge in Chegg’s valuation highlights the potential for AI disruption in education and edtech, raising questions about the future of the edtech sector’s competitive edge and solutions.

Chegg Inc. is facing a potential loss of nearly $1 billion in market valuation as ChatGPT’s popularity grows, leading to a 47% drop in the company’s shares. As Chegg suspends its full-year outlook and estimates Q2 revenue below Wall Street expectations, Chegg CEO Dan Rosensweig admits that ChatGPT has significantly impacted the growth rate of new customers to the company’s platform. Still, some analysts worry that Chegg’s core business may become obsolete due to the rise of free AI tools, and express uncertainty over whether the company’s AI-powered study aid, CheggMate, can counter the slowdown, even if ChatGPT is creating more awareness around Chegg’s solutions in the short-term. Meanwhile, Chegg’s UK rival, Pearson PLC, has seen an 11.5% decline in shares.

As new innovators emerge and harness AI in novel ways, the edtech landscape may be transformed. How should edtech players begin to adapt, and which tea leaves are the most telling? Michael Horn, host of “The Future of Education” podcast and co-founder of the Clayton Christensen Institute, dives deeper into the Chegg news and why AI disruption in education and edtech isn’t even about the allure or impact of AI itself.

Michael’s Thoughts

“Edtech made the news recently as people saw Chegg’s valuation just plummet when the CEO there disclosed that ChatGPT had really cut into its business. And people started saying, oh my goodness, what else is ChatGPT going to disrupt in education? So there’s two things I think to know here. First AI, broadly speaking, is the kernel, a technology enabler, if you will, that creates the opportunity for disruptive innovation. It’s not the disruptive innovation itself, though. Disruption happens when you pair a technology enabler with a new business model that puts it in a low cost position that dramatically expands access. So that’s classic what seems to be happening with ChatGPT and the Chegg story.

But the big point of that is that there’s a lot of businesses, organizations, universities, schools that are going to use artificial intelligence in a sustaining way. They’re going to use it to improve what they currently do, become more efficient at what they currently do and so forth. But the real disruptions, they’re going to occur when they take that technology and pair it with a novel business model that really rethinks the system of how they accomplish education or whatever they’re trying to do and dramatically lowers cost, increases access, makes it far simpler to use.

So simply put, where should we look for AI and ChatGPT and the like to disrupt other parts of education? I think really anything that empowers students. So tutoring is a classic case.

Anything that allows students to learn more, create more. Those are all ripe areas where artificial intelligence is really going to make a dent as new innovators come along and pair these things in new business models to reinvent how we think about education.”

Article written by Daniel Litwin.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Education Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Education Technology Insights

AI didn't break integrity, it exposed credentialism

AI didn't break integrity, it exposed credentialism

AI has exposed a flaw in higher education that predates generative AI: institutions designed around earning credentials rather than demonstrating learning. Phil Hill argues that better cheating detection won't fix this; instead, schools must rebuild assessments around actual learning outcomes, using approaches like competency-based education, authentic assessment, and dual-stream frameworks that accommodate AI while verifying individual capability.

  • 01Credentialism—treating the credential as the goal rather than evidence of learning—creates incentives for shortcuts that existed before AI; students pursue credentials as boxes to check rather than milestones in learning.
  • 02States like Michigan and Texas are redefining postsecondary credentials to include skill certificates alongside degrees, but broader definitions only matter if assessment measures actual learning, not just completion.
  • 03Promising approaches to AI in assessment include competency-based education, authentic assessment methods, and frameworks like Sydney's with AI and proctoring components.

Oct 6, 2026

Lewis University picks Ellucian Student to support its 2026–2029 strategic plan

Lewis University picks Ellucian Student to support its 2026–2029 strategic plan

Lewis University, which serves more than 7,000 students, will move to Ellucian Student, HCM and Finance. The rollout runs through Project Tailwind, a key part of the university's 2026–2029 Taking Flight strategic plan. The release lists support for a growing population of traditional, online, workforce and lifelong learners among the platform's goals.

  • 01Excelsior University deployed Scholarship Universe early while its Ellucian Student implementation is still ongoing.

Oct 2, 2026

CoSN tells school districts to plan for adoption before they buy new tech

CoSN tells school districts to plan for adoption before they buy new tech

CoSN's 2026 Blaschke Report and companion toolkit give K-12 districts a plan for technology change. Its main point is timing. Districts should define the problem, the success measure and staff workload before procurement, then run rollouts through change champions and a council that reviews significant technology changes.

  • 01CoSN’s toolkit pushes planning before procurement: define the problem, affected groups, timeline, and success measures, and account for competing initiatives and implementation fatigue.
  • 02The toolkit urges leaders to account for competing initiatives and implementation fatigue before procurement or a districtwide rollout.
  • 03After launch, districts should track adoption indicators, review feedback and help requests, keep refresher training going, and conduct a post-implementation review.

Oct 2, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512