Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

How the COVID-19 Vaccine for Children Differs From Adults’

Key Points: Pfizer recently announced its vaccine for children is more than 90% effective. In vitro diagnostics company Todos Medical announced the launch of their new COVID-19 antibody blood test which will allow unvaccinated and vaccinated people to monitor their immunity levels to the virus. Healthcare professionals weigh the utility of this type of…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Key Points:

  • Pfizer recently announced its vaccine for children is more than 90% effective.
  • In vitro diagnostics company Todos Medical announced the launch of their new COVID-19 antibody blood test which will allow unvaccinated and vaccinated people to monitor their immunity levels to the virus.
  • Healthcare professionals weigh the utility of this type of testing given the amount of at-risk people they interact with on a daily basis.

Commentary:

The next step in the fight against the COVID-19 virus has been the approval of the vaccine for children. Most recently, Pfizer announced that the vaccine that was approved for children is 90 percent effective against COVID-19. Now that the children’s vaccine is here, what was its development like compared to the one for adults? Was it easier or harder? We sat down with Gerald Commissiong, CEO of Todos Medical, to get insight into how the industry has approached the task of vaccine research and testing for different demographics.

MarketScale also asked Commissiong about the recent announcement by Todos about the launch of its new COVID-19 antibody blood test, which will allow unvaccinated and vaccinated people to monitor their immunity levels to the virus. What role will such a test play in the larger ecosystem of COVID treatment and mitigation?

Abridged Thoughts:

Initially, it was thought, although it’s not clear why it was thought, that children were not going to be affected by COVID in the same manner that adults were. As a result of that, the primary focus was really adults who were traveling from place to place, country to country who can spread the disease.

And the focus was on being able to really get people back into the office, back to work. What we found, obviously, is that getting back to work requires children to be able to get back to school. And so as we’ve made progress with the initial set of vaccines and really an undefined, unknown dosing schedule that has been figured out through real world decisions by different countries to do different things than the clinical trials, that kind of approach could have been disastrous in children because we know that their immune systems are not anywhere near as developed and that potentially impacting their immune systems in a robust way very early on in development could have significant long term impacts.

Because of that, I think correctly, everyone focused on developing an effective and safe vaccine for adults and then began to think through how to use the data from adults to develop for kids. There was some acceleration in the 12 to 15 year age gap with the Pfizer vaccine. I think that is being rethought extensively now, given some of the data and the younger kids where there is no evidence of myocarditis with a much lower dosing schedule that could potentially be even further reduced with lengthening the spacing between doses.

Should the COVID-19 Vaccine’s Intellectual Property Be Accessible for Everyone?

Is It Time to Revamp the Drug Development Pipeline?

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

The next step in the fight against the COVID 19 virus has been the approval of the vaccine for children. Most recently, Pfizer announced that the vaccine that was approved is 90% effective against COVID 19. Now that the children's vaccine is here, what was its development like compared to the one for adults? Was it easier or harder? We asked commissionable CEO of todos medical. Those questions, and this is what he had to say. Certainly, with regards to the development of the vaccine, the differences are dosing. Initially, it was thought, although it's not clear why it was thought that children were not going to be affected by COVID in the same manner that adults were. As a result of that, the primary focus was really adults who were traveling from place to place. Country to country who can spread the disease. And the focus was on being able to really get people back into the office, back to work. What we found, obviously, is that getting back to work requires children to be able to get back to school. And so as we've made progress with the initial set of vaccines and really an undefined unknown dosing schedule that has been figured out through real, real world decisions by different countries to do different things than the clinical trials, that kind of approach could have been disastrous in children because we know that their immune systems are not anywhere near as developed and that potentially impacting their immune systems in a robust way very early on in development could have significant long term impacts. Because of that, I think correctly, everyone focused on developing an effective and safe vaccine for adults and then begin to think through how to use the data from adults to develop for kids. There was some acceleration in the 12 to 15 year age gap with the Pfizer vaccine. I think that is being rethought extensively now, given some of the data and the younger kids where there is no evidence of myocarditis with a much lower dosing schedule that could potentially be even further reduced with lengthening the spacing between doses. So, you know, that's really the way the development in children is different than adults. It's been easier insofar as you have the data from adults now to make those decisions. But that's obviously much harder because the hesitancy among parents to give the COVID vaccine to their kids with really not much data is quite challenging. And so bridging that gap is what the regulators are trying to do now. When fighting the COVID 19 virus, utilizing vaccines is only a part of it, but understanding the antibodies is another portion of it. Recently, todos medical announced the launch of their new COVID 19 antibody blood test, which would allow unvaccinated and vaccinated people to monitor immunity levels to the virus. We ask permission should care professionals weigh the utility of this type of testing, given the amount of at risk people they interact with on a daily basis? We think that it's absolutely essential for many, many decisions and risk assessment to know if you have neutralizing antibodies and what those titers are. When you have an understanding of whether or not everyone has the ability to develop high titers, because what we've seen is that 30% of older people over 80 in Germany develop no antibody titers. The neutralizing antibody titers and 70% of immune compromised people are taking certain drugs develop no antibody titers. So when you look at data like that, care professionals must be aware of the status of their individual patient because it's no longer good enough to say we think there's a 90% or an 85% We know that if you're seeing people who are immunocompromised, who are older, you will be seeing people for whom the vaccine has not worked every day and who are at risk of infection. And because they're in that high risk population, they are at higher risk of hospitalization and death. Therefore, it is critical for everyone who is interacting with those individuals to monitor their antibody titer status and make sure they have high antibodies. In addition to testing, because antibody titers will help reduce the risk but not eliminated, testing will tell you if that defense mechanisms failed as early as possible so that you reduce the number of people that could be exposed. And spread the virus. So in our view, it's absolutely essential for everyone who's interacting with immune compromised and older individuals to understand their immune status. To act accordingly and make sure that they take even more precautions if we see that there titers are low because they are higher risk of infection and higher risk of higher viral loads that could then pass it on to their patients. Stay up to date with the latest news on the COVID 19 vaccine, as well as antibody treatments. Be sure to head the market scale as well as subscribe.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

QinFlow's new pressure bag device skips scheduled calibration and preventive maintenance

QinFlow's new pressure bag device skips scheduled calibration and preventive maintenance

QinFlow's PressSure is a battery-powered device that holds standard pressure bags at one of three fixed preset pressures during blood or IV fluid infusions.

  • 01So far it’s manufacturer design claims; what matters next is in-service reports from early hospital or EMS adopters.

Oct 1, 2026

BedConnect’s Lindsey Joseph on matching post-acute care to patient needs

BedConnect’s Lindsey Joseph on matching post-acute care to patient needs

On I Don’t Care, BedConnect founder Lindsey Joseph and Kevin Stevenson discuss the limits of broad post-acute referrals. Their proposal is to match clinical needs, payer coverage and available beds before presenting options. CMS guidance and AHRQ discharge resources provide independent context; they do not establish BedConnect’s clinical outcomes.

  • 01BedConnect proposes matching clinical needs, payer coverage and bed availability before presenting post-acute options; this is the company’s approach, not independently validated outcome evidence.
  • 02CMS discharge-planning guidance emphasizes patient goals, treatment preferences and relevant provider quality and resource-use data.
  • 03Readmission comparisons need a defined patient group, time window and source; the interview’s roughly one-quarter/fourteen-day estimate has not been independently verified.

Sep 29, 2026

Rock Health: $7.4B went into digital health in H1 2026, and 20 rounds took 45%

Rock Health: $7.4B went into digital health in H1 2026, and 20 rounds took 45%

Rock Health: U.S. digital health startups raised $7.4 billion across 244 deals in H1 2026, up from $6.4 billion on 245 deals in H1 2025. The rebound is concentrated. Nineteen companies raised 20 $100 million-plus rounds that captured 45% of capital.

  • 01In H1 2026, 19 companies raised 20 mega-deals of $100 million or more, representing 45% of all capital invested, according to Rock Health.
  • 02According to Rock Health, the firm stopped labeling startups as “AI-enabled,” saying the technology is now too widespread for the label to be meaningful.

Sep 24, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512