Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Insurance Companies Must Not Take Shortcuts with Medicare Advantage Record Keeping

Medicare Advantage has allegedly overcharged Medicare by $1,000 per policyholder. Melanie Musson, an insurance expert with ExpertInsuranceReviews.com, says, “Medicare Advantage insurance providers must prepare to justify their charges by keeping accurate records and documentation.” Medicare Advantage plans are increasing in popularity, but this private insurance alternative to government-run Original Medicare must be careful to be…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

Medicare Advantage has allegedly overcharged Medicare by $1,000 per policyholder. Melanie Musson, an insurance expert with ExpertInsuranceReviews.com, says, “Medicare Advantage insurance providers must prepare to justify their charges by keeping accurate records and documentation.”

Medicare Advantage plans are increasing in popularity, but this private insurance alternative to government-run Original Medicare must be careful to be transparent or keep accurate records, or they’ll pay the price.

Kaiser Health News recently reported on a trend of Medicare Advantage providers dodging auditors and overcharging taxpayers through billing Medicare.

Medicare Advantage Audit Failures Are Nothing New

In 2011, Blue Cross of Minnesota couldn’t locate records of podiatry patients who were treated at a podiatry clinic accepting Medicare. Federal audits revealed a combined care cost that exceeded $20,000. Due to circumstances surrounding that case and the podiatry clinic facing fraud allegations, the insurance provider was granted a hardship exemption.

But as demands for transparency increase, these exemptions may be harder to obtain, making it vitally important for Medicare Advantage providers to keep their own records and not depend on healthcare providers to give them documentation if needed for an audit.

The Cost of Medicare Advantage Failures

Medicare Advantage plans charge policyholders a premium, and they work with Medicare for payment for Medicare-covered services. Federal audits revealed that Medicare Advantage plans had overcharged Medicare for services averaging $1,000 per Medicare Advantage policyholder.

That equates to millions of dollars overcharged to Medicare. Those costs are passed down to taxpayers.

Medicare Advantage Should Prepare for More Oversight

The federal government has been working to demand repayment for overcharges from Medicare Advantage plan providers. So, these providers must prepare to back up all their charges with the proper documentation to avoid additional repayments or penalties.

Car insurance providers proved their commitment to fair compensation by issuing auto insurance givebacks in the midst of COVID-19 shutdowns. Medicare Advantage providers should take note and prepare to pay back the federal government if necessary.

Whether or not Medicare Advantage actually overcharged Medicare and, thereby, American Taxpayers is a moot point. With proper documentation and record-keeping, insurance providers can prove the legitimacy of their charges.

Medicare Advantage providers must resist the urge to save money by cutting corners and must instead keep organized records and follow the governmental red tape associated with the medicare program.

By doing so, insurance providers can protect themselves and regain the trust of their policyholders and the American taxpayers.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are choosing alliances over mergers, per a July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July deals tracked by Becker's Hospital Review. St. Christopher's, Nemours, Jefferson and Temple signed a nonbinding alliance letter; Palomar UC San Diego Health launched July 1. Ownership stays put; governance, purchasing and outpatient investment absorb the change.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512