Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Scaling Throughput with AI-driven Insurance Claim Processing

The successful use of AI for insurance claim processing depends on identifying and optimizing the performance of hardware and software tools that increase its efficiency, flexibility, and speed. Vasant Kearney, Ph.D., CTO of Retrace Labs, and Ravi Panchumarthy, Ph.D., Machine Learning Engineer at Intel Corporation spoke about the specific challenges faced by the dental industry…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from Intel on MarketScale.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

The successful use of AI for insurance claim processing depends on identifying and optimizing the performance of hardware and software tools that increase its efficiency, flexibility, and speed. Vasant Kearney, Ph.D., CTO of Retrace Labs, and Ravi Panchumarthy, Ph.D., Machine Learning Engineer at Intel Corporation spoke about the specific challenges faced by the dental industry when it uses cloud-based AI computing to process claims, and the creative innovations that Intel and Retrace have developed to address those challenges.

“The thing that makes AI-driven insurance claim processing challenging is the throughput,” Kearney says. “If you’re in a single hospital or small clinic, scalability isn’t much of an issue. But once you move into the insurance world – where the volume is much higher – you have to manage spikes in throughput.” The ability of the AI algorithms being used to manage these spikes (scaling performance up or down based on demand) is determined by how much compute has been allocated to solving the problem. This is where the choice of hardware and software becomes critical.

Most data scientists are familiar with GPUs and choose them when deploying models in production. But GPUs can be costly and create delays due to the way they handle memory and how they are deployed onto scalable tools. “It’s not trivial to share memory between GPUs,” says Kearney. “So, you’re limited by the rather low-memory footprint of each GPU. In AWS, you have GPUs in the range of 12 gigabytes. But CPUs can get up into the terabytes.” This means that many more models can be stored on each instance, making CPUs ideal for healthcare where many different models are often needed to make diagnoses.

Both Panchumarthy and Kearney are excited about the future of AI-driven cloud computing for the insurance industry. “There is great synergy between cloud computing and cutting-edge hardware and software solutions from Retrace and Intel,” says Panchumarthy. “All of these are helping drive even more intelligent and robust medical AI solutions. It’s an exciting place to be.”

Learn more about AI deployment solutions by connecting with Vasant Kearney and Ravi Panchumarthy on LinkedIn or visit Intel’s AI and Deep Learning Solutions to learn more about AI-driven Solutions: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/artificial-intelligence/overview.html

To get started with OpenVINO: https://docs.openvinotoolkit.org/latest/index.html

Learn more about Retrace: https://retrace.ai/media-and-news/

Subscribe to the “Health and Life Sciences at the Edge” channel on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Simplecast to hear more from the Intel Internet of Things Group.

Intel

Part of this channel

Intel

Silicon and AI platforms powering enterprise and edge compute.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Healthcare AI should give doctors attention back, not shorter visits

Healthcare AI should give doctors attention back, not shorter visits

Healthcare organizations should deploy AI to give clinicians back attention and capacity for better decisions, not simply shorten visits. Landry argues AI should fit into existing workflows with insights appearing at the right time, and that organizations should set clear governance and automation boundaries before deployment and measure what changes for patients, clinicians and the organization.

  • 01AI success in healthcare should expand clinician capacity for thoughtful care, not optimize for visit speed; a three-minute appointment is not patient-centered innovation.
  • 02Design AI into workflows clinicians already use with insights appearing at the right moment, making adoption a workflow problem rather than a training problem.
  • 03Set automation boundaries before deploying AI, specifying what it may do alone, what it recommends for clinician decision-making, and what requires explicit human control and accountability.

Nov 11, 2026

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

U.S. health plan administrative costs rose 2.7% to about $69.2 billion in the first half of 2026, even as margins improved to 4.1%. Black Book Research's 2027 outlook says AI is starting to move payer sourcing in both directions. Demand for specialist vendors stays strong in some functions, while automation could make in-house or hybrid models viable in others. The report recommends comparing each major outsourced service with rival vendors and the best internal or hybrid option, and checking whether projected savings become actual cash.

  • 01Every major outsourced payer service should be benchmarked against a rival vendor and against the plan's best feasible internal or hybrid model, a three-way contest at each renewal.
  • 02Avoided vacancies, projected productivity gains and payment recoveries are not recurring cash, so outsourcing savings should not be assumed to fund AI until the service, AI and funding cases each stand on their own.
  • 03Provider data sits on both sides of the sourcing question: it is a top pain point and a specialist-demand area, yet also one of the functions where automation could make hybrid or in-house models viable.

Nov 11, 2026

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham Health and Alleghany Health marked one year with Advocate Health as a surgical technology program drew 65 applicants for 12 seats. An anniversary release lists $11.3 million in pay and rewards and a $19.3 million capital figure, and says nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services through Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. Local training seats look like the next limit in Elkin.

  • 01In rural North Carolina, a new surgical technology program drew more than five applicants per seat, which points to training capacity, not interest, as the thing to expand.
  • 02Pay and rewards totaled $11.3 million in year one, versus a $19.3 million capital figure—about 58% as large, by MarketScale’s arithmetic.
  • 03Nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services versus just over 70 virtual consultations and encounters (about 14:1 by MarketScale’s arithmetic), with expanded virtual care planned for year two.

Nov 10, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512