Understanding Active Versus Passive Communication

 

As they say, communication is key. In a world with more options for communicating than ever before, having strong communication skills is exceptionally valuable. This is easier said than done. After all, out of a few hundred thousand years of human evolutions, the telephone has been a communication option for less than 150 years.

To make understanding how we communicate easier, Howard Holton, co-host of The Suite Spot—a  fireside chat about all topics IT and OT—broke down the differences between active and passive communication. “There are two ways human beings communicate, we have active communication and passive communication. Active communication is literally the communication that takes place between two people in person,” Holton explained.

Because active communication occurs from person to person, it’s very dynamic. “We pick up on all the subtle cues that come along with it from body language, to intonation, rate of speech, micro expressions, right? All of those inform our ability to interpret the context and nuance of what the person is saying,” Holton said. According to Holton, humans are very good at active communication.

Any communication that doesn’t occur in person is passive communication, such as a letter, email, or text. Holton advises being super clear when dealing with passive communication. For example, when communicating in written form, “You have to be really, really clear in what you write in a letter. You can’t allow nuance to really play. You can’t really allow subtext to overly play, the way you do in in-person communication,” Holton said.

Make Sure to Subscribe to The Suite Spot to Stay Up to Date!

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Image

Latest

Leadership
Leading Change from Within: The Power of Transformational Leadership
February 7, 2026

Leadership is being tested in real time. As organizations navigate AI adoption, remote work, and constant structural change, many leaders are discovering that strategy alone isn’t enough. People are asking deeper questions about purpose, trust, and what it really means to show up for teams when uncertainty is the norm. In a world where burnout…

Read More
technology
Clarity Under Pressure: Technology, Trust, and the Future of Public Safety
February 7, 2026

When something goes wrong in a community—a major storm, a large-scale accident, a violent incident—there’s often a narrow window where clarity matters most. Leaders must make fast decisions, responders need to trust the information in front of them, and the systems supporting those choices have to work as intended. Public safety agencies now rely…

Read More
weather Intelligence
Clarity in the Storm: Weather Intelligence, GIS, and the Future of Operational Awareness
February 6, 2026

For many organizations today, weather has shifted from an occasional disruption to a constant planning factor. Scientific assessments show that extreme weather events—including heatwaves, heavy rainfall, and wildfires—are occurring more frequently and with greater intensity, placing growing strain on infrastructure, utilities, and public services. As weather-related disruptions become more costly and harder to manage,…

Read More
AI in sterile processing
AI in Sterile Processing Is Proving Its Value by Acting as a Co-Pilot, Not a Replacement
February 5, 2026

Sterile processing departments are dealing with persistent operational pressures. Surgical case volumes are rising, instruments are more complex, and staffing shortages remain across many health systems. Accuracy and documentation requirements continue to tighten, leaving little room for error. In busy hospitals, sterile processing teams may handle 10,000 to 30,000 surgical instruments per day, with…

Read More