Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesRetail

Lower Price Points May Not Be Sustainable for Shein and Forever 21’s Partnership

The ultra-low cost model that powers both retailers faces real pressure when trying to scale their ambitious brick-and-mortar expansion

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Retail teams put it to work with Sales Enablement.

By Ying Huang · · Corporate PartnershipCorporate Social ResponsibilityCsrFast Fashion
Share

Key takeaways

01

The ultra-low cost model that powers both retailers faces real pressure when trying to scale their ambitious brick-and-mortar expansion

Free workspace

Turn your Retail expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Over the summer, fast fashion retail giants, Shein and Forever 21, announced a collaborative effort in a move to widen their customer bases. Shein will see its products sold out of the retail company's hundreds of locations, and in turn Forever 21 gets hold of the online retail giant’s massive global reach and supply chain. The significant partnership between the two companies is buzzing in the retail industry, particularly as it pertains to the demands of consumers and the companies' promises of staying ahead of the fashion curve. Shein and Forever 21's partnership comes at time where the demand for fast fashion is high.

Fast fashion has long been criticized for its negative impact on the environment and critiques are not letting up anytime soon. So, while this joint force will appeal to customers with more choices, herein comes the question of whether this competitive advantage can be sustained and how will this impact the supply chain?

Dr. Ying Huang is a Professor of Marketing and Acting Chair of MEI at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, who emphasizes that sustainability is at the heart of the matter for fast fashion retailers. The lure of fast fashion is a product that is cheap and fast, and requires consumers to repeatedly buy and discard; all while retailers continuously produce more to attract. In juxtaposing it to the fair trade coffee industry, Dr. Huang questioned the partnership's sustainability with low pricing.

For any fast fashion retailer, sustainability is a central issue because, by definition, fast fashion means fashion comes in fast, at a cheaper price, and then also the trend will go fast.
— Dr. Ying Huang, Professor of Marketing and Acting Chair of MEI at the University of Massachusetts Lowell

Dr. Huang's Thoughts on Shein and Forever 21's Partnership

"A sustainable competitive advantage, okay? So, competitive advantage has to be sustainable to attract the customers and to develop that customer loyalty. So, for Shein and Forever 21, certainly they will have competitive advantage because they are the joint force, but also they need to make their business model more sustainable to be able to compete with others in the industry.

In my view, for any fast fashion retailer, any fast fashion brands, sustainability is a central issue because, by definition, fast fashion means fashion comes in fast, at a cheaper price, and then also the trend will go fast. So, consumers, they buy more, and then they down it, and they buy more. So, yeah, for any fast fashion retailer, this is an issue.

This strategic partnership with Forever 21, of course, for Shein it’s in terms of physical presence, a huge advantage because Forever 21 has more than 500, I think 560 stores, mostly in the U. S. , but also worldwide.

For Forever 21, of course, the supply chain, the competency of Shein, in supply chain, particularly with this low, extremely low price. If we look at the Forever 21 and the Shein, actually, we see the price difference.”

"So, for Shein, actually, it’s pricing lower. You can see like a t-shirt or even a sweater priced only $1, $2. Forever 21 is actually a little bit more expensive, $9, $10.

So, with this supply chain, the Shein supply chain, actually, I think Forever 21 can benefit in terms of their cost structure, in terms of the supply sources, and potentially even cut price more. So, again, with this huge partnership, you know, again, the U. S.

consumers and, of course, shoppers worldwide, they have more choices. Now, they have Shein's products, also Forever 21’s products. So, I do say, you know, in terms of sustainability, yes, it does not make it better.

So, that is why Shein and Forever 21 also need to look this further in terms of how to address this concern. I also, on the other hand, because of the physical presence, I doubt Shein can maintain that low price points, okay, before they don’t have those costs, right? Now, they do have those costs.

So, yeah, I mean, again, increased prices, I don’t think it’s necessarily a bad thing.”

If you rely only on low price points, I don’t think it’s sustainable because shoppers, consumers, they can easily switch to another lower price competitors.
— Dr. Ying Huang, Professor of Marketing and Acting Chair of MEI at the University of Massachusetts Lowell

"If for any retailer, if you rely only on low price points, I don’t think it’s sustainable because shoppers, consumers, they can easily switch to another lower price competitors, right? So, if you just rely on price points, it’s not a consumer loyalty. I don’t think it’s a loyalty. It’s just because it’s cheaper price, right? And shoppers can be attracted to even cheaper price, okay? If all the players, you know, play this twice more, nobody’s going to win, right? So, previously in the coffee industry, we hear this fair trade coffee, right? So, you have to face out, you have to pay the vendors, the suppliers enough money, you have to pay your employee enough wage. So, everybody will be profiting from being part of this global supply chain, right? You cannot rely on just squeeze your spenders as, you know, out of the profit. So, I don’t think it’s sustainable."

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Retail starts with a company putting its merchandising leads, store operations teams, and category managers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Category buyers trust operators, so your merchandising leads shorten the distance between first search and first call.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

Ying Huang
Ying HuangProfessor at Manning School of Business

Professor of Marketing with a demonstrated history of working in higher education. Research expertise in B2B Marketing, Foreign Market Entry, CSR and Retailing.

B2B Weekly

The week in Retail, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Retail: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Retail buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Retail expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your merchandising leads, store operations teams, and category managers into the articles, video, and social content Retail buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Retail Insights

Lasko says shoppers now expect fans to purify the air

Lasko says shoppers now expect fans to purify the air

Lasko says consumers now want sphere designs, per-person set points and air purification, alongside 120 years of retailer trust and a Made in USA badge. Dyson's own site lists purifying heaters at $659.99 and $949.99. A March 2026 executive order directs the FTC to prioritize Made in USA enforcement.

  • 01Lasko says demand has moved from a box in the corner to sphere designs in fresh colors that shoppers show off to friends, with a temperature set point for each person in the house.
  • 02Dyson's own site lists purifying heaters at $659.99 and $949.99 with app control, the dearer one with sealed HEPA H13 filtration, a benchmark for buyers comparing purification claims and price.
  • 03Executive Order 14392, signed in March 2026, tells the FTC to prioritize Made in USA enforcement, so the badge Lasko prints on its packaging is a claim retailers can expect to be asked about.

Oct 29, 2026

FTC orders nine companies to say whether personal data shapes their prices and pay

FTC orders nine companies to say whether personal data shapes their prices and pay

The Federal Trade Commission issued Section 6(b) orders on Oct. 28 to nine airlines, ride-hailing, delivery and retail companies asking how they use personal data to set prices and driver pay. The orders are study orders, not enforcement actions, and recipients have 45 days to respond. Several of the companies have said publicly that they do not set individual prices from personal data.

  • 01The nine recipients are Delta, United, JetBlue, Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, Target and Walmart, and they have 45 days to respond.
  • 02Section 6(b) authorizes studies without a specific law enforcement purpose, and the FTC has not accused any recipient of wrongdoing.

Oct 29, 2026

DoorDash agrees to buy Instacart for $17 billion as both companies report third quarter results

DoorDash agrees to buy Instacart for $17 billion as both companies report third quarter results

DoorDash and Instacart signed a definitive agreement on Thursday for DoorDash to buy the grocery marketplace at $65.00 a share in cash and stock, an equity value of about $17 billion. The announcement landed alongside third quarter results from both companies, and the deal is not expected to close until the end of 2027 or the first half of 2028.

  • 01Instacart holders can elect deal value of $65.00 a share, a 26% premium to the Oct. 22 close, with at least 75% of total consideration paid in cash.
  • 02Closing is expected at the end of 2027 or in the first half of 2028, after an Instacart shareholder vote and antitrust review in the US, Canada and Israel.
  • 03DoorDash targets $500 million or more in annual synergies and says it will reinvest more than all of them in the first year after closing.

Oct 29, 2026

Explore More Retail Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Retail.

Browse Retail Hub

About the Expert

Ying Huang
Ying Huang

Professor at Manning School of Business

Professor of Marketing with a demonstrated history of working in higher education. Research expertise in B2B Marketing, Foreign Market Entry, CSR and Retailing.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Retail and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512