Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Sports & Entertainment

College Athletes Ponder NIL Deals Through Their University vs. Official License Agreements. Why Not Both?

Athletes no longer need to pick between institutional and independent monetization opportunities, opening multiple revenue streams simultaneously

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Sports & Entertainment teams put it to work with Events & Onsite Capture.

By Leigh Steinberg · College AthleticsConcordia University IrvineLeigh SteinbergMarquette University
Share

Key takeaways

01

Athletes no longer need to pick between institutional and independent monetization opportunities, opening multiple revenue streams simultaneously

College Athletes could enter a golden age with NIL deals available through official Licensing contracts and now localized University agreements. Is this a case of choosing one over the other? Perhaps these athletes can have the best of both worlds.

Marquette Athletics unveiled its official NIL (Name, Image & Likeness) Store, a collaborative effort with Campus Ink. This unique platform is a hub for fans to support over 150 Marquette athletes across 12 sports, including standouts like the reigning Big East Men's Basketball Player of the Year, Tyler Kolek. Every piece of merchandise is officially licensed by Marquette University, ensuring authenticity. As the store evolves, fans can anticipate a continuous rollout of distinctive products and custom merchandise tailored for individual athletes. This initiative is part of a broader movement, with institutions like Illinois, Indiana, and LSU also joining the NIL Store network, all under the umbrella of Campus Ink, a company championed by entrepreneur Mark Cuban.

So, with many outlets to capitalize on one's personal brand, do Athletes need to weigh potential NIL deals against each other, or should they take advantage of all that's on the table?

Leigh Steinberg, Sports Agent and Adjunct Professor at Concordia University Irvine admits these are still early times for college athletic NIL deals, with many uncharted waters, but thinks it's lucrative territory that deserves exploration.

Leigh's Thoughts

"We are in the infancy of the development of NIL strategies. Remember, it was only 2020 when California passed SB 206, which gave athletes the ability to hire marketing agents and do commercial deals. And once California did it, that awakened in schools across the country, the concept that California would have the ability, through SC, UCLA, Cal Stanford, and San Jose State, to offer in recruiting athletes significantly more money than other places.

It spread nationally and created pressure on the NCAA, but this has only been going since the summer of 2021 and is still evolving.

So, university structures that do licensing deals are coming a little bit late to the table, but late is a relative term in this growing new field.

And I would expect that because of their association with the college campus and their understanding of the dynamics of how to reach their audience is very high, we'll see a blend of independent deals for an athlete and officially licensed and structured deals coming also through the university.

So, I think that athletes will take advantage of both of these sources and both these opportunities in the same way they take some deals from the collective and do some deals independently.
— Leigh Steinberg, Sports Agent and Adjunct Professor at Concordia University Irvine
Video TranscriptExpand ↓

We are in the infancy of the development NIL Strategy. Remember it was only twenty twenty when California passed SB two zero six which gave athletes the ability to hire marketing agents and do commercial deals. And once California debit that awakened in schools across the country, the concept that California would have the ability through SCUCLA, Stanford, San Jose State, to offer in recruiting athletes significantly more money than other places it spread nationally created pressure on the NCAA AA, but this has only been going since the summer of twenty twenty one and is still evolving. So university structures that do licensing deals are coming a little bit late to the table, but relates to relative term in this, growing new field. And I would expect that because of their association with the college, campus and their understanding of the dynamics of how to reach their audience is very high that will see a blend of independent deals for an athlete and officially licensed deals coming also through the university. So I think that athletes will take advantage of both these sources and both these opportunities in the same way they take some deals from the collective and do some deals independently.

About the author

Leigh Steinberg
Leigh SteinbergHall of Fame Sports Agent and Chairman, Steinberg Sports & Entertainment

Leigh Steinberg, premier sports agent, entrepreneur, best-selling author, and Chairman of Leigh Steinberg Sports and Entertainment Holdings, is best known for his work building athletes into stand-alone brands. He is often credited as the real-life inspiration for the Oscar-winning film Jerry Maguire. Leigh has represented many of the most successful athletes and coaches in football, basketball, baseball, hockey, boxing, and golf, including the number one overall pick in the NFL draft for an unprecedented eight times in conjunction with 64 total first round picks. With an unrivaled history of record-setting contracts, Leigh has secured over $4 billion for his 300+ pro athlete clients and directed more than $1 billion to various charities around the world.

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Sports & Entertainment companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Sports & Entertainment Insights

USA’s perfect World Cup start and the business case behind the hype

USA’s perfect World Cup start and the business case behind the hype

The US Men's National Team achieved a perfect start by winning its first two matches in the 2026 World Cup as one of its co-hosts. This success has significant implications for sponsorship opportunities, hospitality sectors, and B2B demand in the sports-entertainment industry.

  • 01USMNT's perfect start in the 2026 World Cup.
  • 02Positive impact on sponsorship opportunities.
  • 03Increased B2B demand in sports-entertainment.

Jun 19, 2026

As World Cup arrives in the US, creator-access clauses reshape broadcast rights deals

As World Cup arrives in the US, creator-access clauses reshape broadcast rights deals

FIFA's broadcast strategy for the 2026 World Cup in the United States, Canada, and Mexico represents the most structurally complex rights package in the tournament's history. Deals now span over 220 territories, include a live-streaming partnership with YouTube, and formally embed creator access into rights frameworks for the first time. Meanwhile, Fox Sports' legacy deal — secured in 2015 for $485 million — has become what Observer describes as the broadcast bargain of the century, setting up dramatically higher price expectations in the next rights cycle.

  • 01FIFA secured broadcast agreements in over 220 territories, with a Dallas-based International Broadcast Centre distributing roughly 8,000 hours of additional non-live content, according to FIFA.
  • 02Fox Sports pays $485 million for US rights to a tournament Observer estimates is worth more than three times that figure — making it likely the last major sports broadcast deal secured at a deep discount.
  • 03FIFA's first-ever global creator programme and a preferred-platform deal with YouTube — allowing broadcasters to stream the first 10 minutes of every match plus select full games — mark a structural shift in how rights are packaged.

Jun 17, 2026

As the World Cup hits US soil, creator-access clauses move into broadcast rights deals

As the World Cup hits US soil, creator-access clauses move into broadcast rights deals

Fox is broadcasting the 2026 FIFA World Cup for $485 million — a fee industry experts estimate to be less than half the open-market value of the rights. The deal traces to a 2014 backroom concession FIFA made to avoid litigation when it shifted the 2022 Qatar tournament out of summer. As the tournament runs across 104 matches and 16 cities, it is also serving as a live demonstration of where sports media technology, creator economics, and broadcast rights negotiations are all heading simultaneously.

  • 01Fox is paying $485M for rights that industry experts value between $1B and $1.5B, making this one of the most undervalued broadcast deals in sports history.
  • 02FIFA explored rescinding Fox's contract, engaging law firm Paul Weiss, but backed down after Fox produced a roughly 10-page legal defense of its position.
  • 03Creator-access clauses and purpose-built on-site creator studios are entering 2026 broadcast rights frameworks, signaling a structural shift in how sports content reaches audiences.

Jun 17, 2026

Explore More Sports & Entertainment Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Sports & Entertainment.

Browse Sports & Entertainment Hub

About the Expert

LS
Leigh Steinberg